PAGLIUCA
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Hesse
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
SDNY Prosecutors
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unidentified Female Expert
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MOE
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-15 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio by Mr. Pagliuca regarding academic studies on sexual grooming. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-22 | N/A | Court filing date of the transcript document. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Mr. Alessi by attorney Mr. Pagliuca. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Cross-examination of witness Ms. Hesse by attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding messages she took, whic... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Cross-examination | Cross-examination of witness Ms. Hesse by attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding messages she recorded, ... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Alessi in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Alessi in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial). | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial) | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Cross-examination of Juan Alessi in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Cross-examination of witness Ms. Hesse by Mr. Pagliuca regarding messages in exhibits 1J, 1K, and... | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Meeting at SDNY offices | SDNY offices | View |
| 2016-04-22 | N/A | Videotaped Deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell | Boies Schiller & Flexner, NY | View |
DOJ-OGR-00018179.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi, by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on Mr. Alessi's first meeting with Virginia Roberts at Mar-a-Lago and whether he recalls Ghislaine Maxwell entering the property for a treatment. Mr. Alessi confirms meeting Roberts but states he does not recall Maxwell going for a treatment.
DOJ-OGR-00018177.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing the moment a recess is called. The judge dismisses the witness, Mr. Alessi, from the stand and addresses a logistical request from Ms. Williams for A/V personnel to meet with the government. After confirming with attorneys Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca that there are no other matters, the judge announces a ten-minute recess.
DOJ-OGR-00018166.jpg
Page 65 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of Mr. Alessi by Mr. Pagliuca. The testimony focuses on confirming details of a 'major renovation' at a Palm Beach property, including work on bathrooms, floors, guestroom molding, and masonry. The dialogue also establishes that architects from New York would fly down to Palm Beach to supervise the work.
DOJ-OGR-00018152.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, questions Alessi about a prior deposition answer concerning when a person named Jane met Jeffrey Epstein and "Glen Maxwell". Alessi clarifies his previous testimony, stating he confused Jane, whom he met in 1994 as a minor, with another girl he met around 2001-2002.
DOJ-OGR-00018083.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of the direct examination of a witness named Alessi. The testimony concerns a communal message pad kept on a kitchen desk. Following the testimony, an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, objects to the admission of certain messages as evidence, arguing they are hearsay while conceding that messages in Mr. Alessi's or his wife's handwriting have been authenticated.
DOJ-OGR-00018050.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Alessi. Alessi is questioned about a book, which he identifies as a later, thinner version of a previous one, and notes that his name, which was listed in connection with a house in Palm Beach, is absent. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, objects to the line of questioning but is overruled by the court before the proceedings turn to a sealed government exhibit.
DOJ-OGR-00018002.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Alessi (likely in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). Alessi details Jeffrey Epstein's various properties, including Zorro Ranch, Little St. James (referred to as 'Little St. Jeff'), a New York home, a Paris home, and a home in Columbus, Ohio. Alessi also describes flying once with Ghislaine Maxwell to Miami on Epstein's first plane, identified as a Hawker.
DOJ-OGR-00017946.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a legal argument between attorney Mr. Pagliuca and the Judge regarding the permissible scope of cross-examination for a psychology expert witness. The discussion focuses on the concept of 'delayed disclosure' in sexual abuse cases and whether the defense can question the expert about alternative reasons for such delays beyond what was presented in direct testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00017943.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between attorneys (Ms. Pomerantz, Mr. Pagliuca) and the judge regarding a question posed to a witness, Dr. Rocchio. The judge clarifies why a specific question about grooming and sexual gratification was objected to and ultimately precluded, citing the narrow basis for excluding testimony on the theory of 'grooming by proxy'.
DOJ-OGR-00015016.jpg
This document is a court transcript from January 15, 2025, detailing a portion of the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio. Attorney Pagliuca successfully moves to admit Defendant's Exhibit A into evidence with no objection from opposing counsel, Ms. Pomerantz. Mr. Pagliuca then begins to question the witness, addressed as 'Doctor', about another piece of evidence, Exhibit B.
DOJ-OGR-00015014.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, is cross-examining a witness named Rocchio about their knowledge of academic literature on the topic of sexual grooming, specifically mentioning a study titled "Sexual Grooming of Children" and the "Craven article." The witness acknowledges familiarity with the titles but states they cannot recall the specific contents or conclusions without reviewing the articles again.
DOJ-OGR-00014976.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case dated January 15, 2025. In it, an attorney named Mr. Pagliuca requests the time records of a witness, Rocchio, to establish potential financial motive and bias related to a contract. The judge questions the legal basis for this request, prompting Mr. Pagliuca to argue his entitlement under the legal precedents of Brady and Giglio.
DOJ-OGR-00014882.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case dated January 15, 2025. Counsel discusses logistical matters, including receiving permission for Mr. Pagliuca to miss a final pretrial conference due to a hearing in Colorado. The court then moves to a Daubert hearing concerning the government's proposed expert, Dr. Lisa Rocchio, whose name pronunciation is clarified for the record.
DOJ-OGR-00008337.jpg
This is a court transcript from a case filed on December 10, 2021, detailing a conversation between the judge and attorneys for the defense and government. The discussion focuses on whether the defense will call expert witnesses (LaPorte and Naso), with a defense attorney stating it's unlikely and was only considered as a precaution regarding 'Accuser No. 2'. A government attorney expresses concern about the potential for the defense to decide to call these experts in the middle of the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00008329.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a hearing on December 10, 2021. The judge and attorneys discuss procedural matters for an upcoming trial, agreeing to resolve a hearsay/relevance issue during the trial itself. The court then raises the issue of whether individuals disclosed by the defense, specifically Kelso and Lopez, should be considered fact witnesses rather than expert witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00008317.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a hearing on December 10, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The transcript captures a discussion between the judge (THE COURT), Mr. Pagliuca, and Ms. Comey regarding pre-trial motions. The judge rules that an attorney cannot be called as a witness without prior briefing, and the parties discuss the timing and content of jury instructions for witnesses who will be testifying under pseudonyms.
DOJ-OGR-00018960.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Hesse, by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, regarding a series of messages from court exhibits addressed to individuals named Mr. JE, Sarah, and Jeffrey. The judge (THE COURT) also interjects to provide instructions and clarifications to the jury and counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00018958.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Hesse, by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, regarding messages she recorded. The questioning focuses on identifying the recipients of these messages, specifically Mr. Epstein (initials JE) and a person named Sarah, by referring to an exhibit labeled GX-1B.
DOJ-OGR-00018912.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a legal objection made by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, under Rule 404(b) during the direct examination of a witness named Shawn. Another attorney, Ms. Comey, counters that the testimony is "Direct evidence," prompting the judge to intervene.
DOJ-OGR-00018848.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on the witness's claim that she previously saw a photograph of a nude and pregnant Ms. Maxwell in Epstein's house.
DOJ-OGR-00016847.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Dr. Dubin, by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on a specific flight log entry (916) and a passenger named "Jane." Dr. Dubin states he cannot fully read the entry and does not recall the flight or meeting anyone named Jane on it.
DOJ-OGR-00002082.jpg
This document is a timeline infographic filed as a legal exhibit (Document 97-18) in December 2020, illustrating the frequency of contact between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (attorneys Pagliuca, Everdell, and Cohen) and SDNY prosecutors. The timeline covers the period from July 2019 through March 2020, detailing specific phone calls, email exchanges, and in-person meetings at SDNY offices. The graphic aims to demonstrate that the defense was in regular communication with the prosecution leading up to the 2020 dates.
DOJ-OGR-00016859.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing the end of the cross-examination of a witness, Dr. Dubin. Attorney Ms. Moe asks a final question about medical conditions, which is objected to by attorney Mr. Pagliuca but allowed by the judge. After a brief answer, the testimony concludes, and the court excuses Dr. Dubin.
DOJ-OGR-00016852.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of Dr. Dubin. An attorney questions Dr. Dubin about his knowledge of a woman named Eva who was reportedly dating or close to Mr. Epstein between 1994 and 2004, which Dr. Dubin cannot recall. The questioning concludes with Dr. Dubin explicitly denying ever having been in a group sexual encounter or a sexualized massage with an individual referred to as 'Jane'.
DOJ-OGR-00016851.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, is questioning a witness, Dr. Dubin, about a flight list from a document labeled 662-RR. Dr. Dubin confirms that she, her husband, and her children (with one name misspelled) were on a flight from TIST to PBI.
No Subject
No preview available
No Subject
No preview available
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity