This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a legal objection made by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, under Rule 404(b) during the direct examination of a witness named Shawn. Another attorney, Ms. Comey, counters that the testimony is "Direct evidence," prompting the judge to intervene.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
Referred to as MR. PAGLIUCA, he objects to a question under Rule 404(b).
|
| COMEY | Attorney |
Referred to as MS. COMEY, she responds to an objection by stating the question elicits "Direct evidence".
|
| Shawn | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as the subject of a direct examination ("Shawn - direct").
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
Addressed by both MR. PAGLIUCA and MS. COMEY. The speaker is identified as THE COURT.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| DOJ | Government agency |
Appears in the document identifier 'DOJ-OGR-00018912' at the bottom right, likely standing for Department of Justice.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting agency, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
"Your Honor, I'm going to object to the first question under Rule 404(b) and answer."Source
"Direct evidence, your Honor."Source
"I need to hear it from you."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (653 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document