Hesse
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ghislaine
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
SARAH
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Indirect |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
SARAH
|
Indirect |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Message Slips
|
Authenticator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JEFFREY
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Phone Messages
|
Record keeper |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Hiring | Ghislaine Maxwell hired the witness, Hesse. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Cross-examination of witness Hesse regarding their part-time employment. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Review of evidentiary exhibits (1J, 1K, 1M) during trial testimony. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Testimony | A witness is being questioned about the practice of taking phone messages for Mr. Epstein. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Meeting | Hesse describes her initial meeting with Ghislaine, where she received instructions on how to han... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Employment | The witness, Hesse, worked at the home of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. | El Brillo Way, Palm Beach | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Direct examination of witness Hesse in court case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Direct examination of witness Hesse regarding Government Exhibits 1, 2, and 3, which are identifi... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A direct examination of a witness named Hesse, during which a legal discussion occurred between a... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Direct examination of witness Mrs. Hesse by attorney Ms. Moe regarding procedures for taking phon... | courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A direct examination of witness Hesse, during which a discussion arose between the court and Ms. ... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Direct examination of a witness named Hesse by an attorney, Ms. Moe, regarding two messages. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Direct examination of witness Hesse regarding Government Exhibit 1B. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Court testimony of witness Hesse regarding their past employment. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | A court proceeding involving the direct examination of a witness named Hesse, where an attorney (... | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Cross-examination of witness Ms. Hesse by Mr. Pagliuca regarding messages in exhibits 1J, 1K, and... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court filing of transcript for Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell context). | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial) | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court Testimony | Southern District Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Filing date of the court transcript document. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | A discussion between Ms. Moe and the Court regarding the admission of three spiral-bound message ... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A direct examination of a witness named Hesse, during which an attorney (Ms. Moe) and the judge (... | courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Cross-examination of witness Ms. Hesse by attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding messages she took, whic... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Mrs. Hesse by Mr. Pagliuca regarding her message-taking practices, f... | Courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00018960.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Hesse, by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, regarding a series of messages from court exhibits addressed to individuals named Mr. JE, Sarah, and Jeffrey. The judge (THE COURT) also interjects to provide instructions and clarifications to the jury and counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00018959.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures the cross-examination of a witness, Mrs. Hesse, by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, regarding her precision in taking messages. The questioning focuses on a specific document, labeled '1C', which contains messages for a 'Mr. Epstein' and 'Sarah', but which Mrs. Hesse claims she did not write and appears blank on her copy.
DOJ-OGR-00018958.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Hesse, by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, regarding messages she recorded. The questioning focuses on identifying the recipients of these messages, specifically Mr. Epstein (initials JE) and a person named Sarah, by referring to an exhibit labeled GX-1B.
DOJ-OGR-00018954.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a cross-examination involving a witness named Hesse. The testimony focuses on Hesse's employment history with Maxwell and Epstein, specifically when she started (roughly September 2003) and stopped working for them (around 2004), and that she was hired by Epstein after an interview with Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00018950.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Hesse by Ms. Moe regarding 'Government Exhibit 1B'. The testimony focuses on identifying specific written messages, one dated 8/12/04 signed by the witness, and another dated 7/30 addressed 'for Mr. Epstein', potentially left by someone named Carolyn or someone with the initial 'K'.
DOJ-OGR-00018949.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022. It shows a brief portion of the direct examination of a witness named Hesse, where a questioner directs their attention to a piece of evidence labeled "Government Exhibit 1B".
DOJ-OGR-00018948.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of a trial. An attorney, Ms. Moe, is beginning her direct examination of a witness, Mrs. Hesse, regarding 'Government Exhibit 1B'. After a brief delay while the witness locates the exhibit in her binder, Ms. Moe prepares to ask questions, noting the need for discretion by not reading names from the document aloud.
DOJ-OGR-00018945.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument regarding the admissibility of 'message books' containing caller names, dates, times, and callback numbers intended for the defendant and Mr. Epstein. The Court overrules an objection, citing Federal Rule of Evidence 803.6 (Business Records), stating that witnesses Alessi and Hesse provided sufficient foundation that these were regular records rather than miscellaneous jottings.
DOJ-OGR-00018944.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a debate between two attorneys, Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Moe, over the admissibility of certain records. Mr. Pagliuca argues the records are unreliable and lack the necessary details to qualify for the business record exception. Ms. Moe counters that the records are being offered for the limited purpose of showing the dates and times of calls, and their trustworthiness is supported by the testimony of two other witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00018943.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between the court and Mr. Pagliuca. The conversation centers on the rules of evidence, specifically the inadmissibility of hearsay statements within records like police or hospital reports for proving the truth of the matter asserted, unless a specific exception like a business duty to ensure accuracy applies.
DOJ-OGR-00018941.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination regarding the testimony of Juan Alessi, a former employee of Jeffrey Epstein. The text focuses on Alessi's procedures for answering phones and recording messages in a 'message book' for Epstein, noting that Alessi, his wife, and another personal assistant were all responsible for this task. The page concludes with a legal argument citing Second Circuit case law (United States v. Algamal) regarding the requirements for a custodian of records.
DOJ-OGR-00018940.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, during the direct examination of a witness named Hesse. Prosecutor Ms. Moe discusses the admissibility and formatting of message exhibits and specifically reads from Government Exhibit 606, a 'household manual,' detailing strict instructions for employees on how to record phone messages.
DOJ-OGR-00018939.jpg
A transcript page from a court proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022. Attorney Ms. Moe argues for the admissibility of a bound, sequentially numbered book under the 'business records exception,' contending that witnesses do not need to testify to recording entries at the exact moment of occurrence. The Court (Judge) agrees to review the relevant case law during a break.
DOJ-OGR-00018936.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Hesse. Attorney Ms. Moe and the Court discuss the admissibility of exhibits 1B, 3P, and 3X, debating hearsay objections and the criteria for the 'business records' exception. The Judge outlines the requirements for establishing a foundation for business records.
DOJ-OGR-00018935.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a legal argument between defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca and prosecutor Ms. Moe regarding the admissibility of a 'spiral bound book' of message slips during the direct examination of a witness named Hesse. Pagliuca objects under Federal Rules of Evidence 801 and 803.6, arguing the witness lacks the knowledge to establish a business record foundation, while Moe counters that the authenticity of the book itself is not in dispute.
DOJ-OGR-00018934.jpg
This document is a page from the trial transcript (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) where the prosecution (Ms. Moe) and defense (Mr. Pagliuca) argue over the admissibility of message slips. The prosecution asserts these records prove a victim named 'Carolyn' contacted 'the house' during the conspiracy, while the defense argues the slips lack dates and signatures and cannot be fully authenticated by the current witness (Hesse).
DOJ-OGR-00018933.jpg
This page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) details a legal argument between the prosecution (Ms. Moe) and the Judge regarding the admissibility of phone message logs. The prosecution argues these logs are business records that corroborate victim testimony about calling 'the house' to schedule massage appointments. The document specifically notes that the name of a victim who testified the previous day appears in these messages.
DOJ-OGR-00018932.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between an attorney, Ms. Moe, and the judge. Ms. Moe is seeking to admit three spiral-bound message books as evidence, arguing they have been properly authenticated and should be admitted despite a hearsay objection, citing that similar evidence was previously accepted in the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00018931.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of the direct examination of a witness named Hesse. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, objects to the admission of certain records on hearsay grounds, arguing the witness only has personal knowledge of the signatures. In response, the judge decides to address the objection after giving the jury a 15-minute morning break.
DOJ-OGR-00018929.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Hesse. Hesse identifies Government Exhibits 1, 2, and 3 as message pads used to take phone messages while they were working at the 'Epstein home'. The witness confirms their familiarity with the message pads, their contents, and affirms that their signature is present in all three books.
DOJ-OGR-00018926.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022. A witness, identified as Hesse, testifies about being employed around 2003 at the Palm Beach residence of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The witness states they were hired directly by Ghislaine Maxwell to maintain the home when the owners were not present.
DOJ-OGR-00013376.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Hesse by prosecutor Mr. Pagliuca regarding specific evidentiary exhibits (1J, 1K, and 1M). These exhibits are identified as message pads containing messages directed to 'Mr. JE,' 'Jeffrey,' and 'Sarah.'
DOJ-OGR-00013375.jpg
This document is page 97 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (US v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. A witness named Hesse is being cross-examined regarding her precision in taking phone messages compared to other messages found on an exhibit labeled '1C'. The questioning highlights specific messages on the exhibit directed to 'Mr. Epstein' and 'Sarah'.
DOJ-OGR-00013374.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Hesse, by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, regarding messages she recorded. The messages, part of exhibit GX-1B, were for individuals named Mr. Epstein (initials JE) and Sarah.
DOJ-OGR-00013371.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Hesse. Hesse confirms they worked as a part-time manager/caretaker at Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach house around 2003, handling maintenance when Epstein was not present. The witness also states that Ms. Maxwell was sometimes at the property during their employment.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity