Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Executor |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
RICHARD D. KAHN
|
Executor |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Litigation |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Litigation |
2
|
2 | |
|
location
Lifestyles Convention
|
Litigation |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Bennet J. Moskowitz
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
George
|
Adversarial regulatory |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Teala Davies
|
Litigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Litigant |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Anastasia Doe
|
Litigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
George
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
Lifestyles Convention
|
Adversarial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
RICHARD D. KAHN
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Teala Davies
|
Adversarial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Teala Davies
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Adversarial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Government of USVI
|
Adversarial litigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
IRS
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Christopher A. Kroblin
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Anastasia Doe
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial plaintiff vs defendant |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-01 | N/A | Plaintiff's Brief in Response to Court Order filed. | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2022-03-04 | N/A | Original Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees was filed. | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2021-03-17 | N/A | Court Order requesting the Estate address whether the case should be designated as complex. | Virgin Islands | View |
| 2021-01-01 | N/A | Sale of Jeffrey Epstein's New York City and Palm Beach residences completed | New York City, Palm Beach | View |
| 2020-06-15 | N/A | Deadline for Defendants to reply | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2020-05-09 | N/A | An Order was entered by the Clerk in the matter of Maxwell v. Estate of Epstein. | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2020-05-01 | N/A | Complaint filed in this action. | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2020-05-01 | N/A | Motion to dismiss filed by Defendants | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2020-04-14 | N/A | General’s Status Report on Voluntary Compensation Program filed. | V.I. Super. Ct. | View |
| 2020-03-24 | N/A | Debt petition docketed and Case Number ST-2020-CV-00155 assigned | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2020-02-28 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss | New York, New York | View |
| 2019-10-22 | N/A | Summons issued and filed. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-10-17 | N/A | Filing of Civil Cover Sheet for Case 1:19-cv-09610-PAE-DCF | SDNY (Manhattan) | View |
| 2019-08-15 | N/A | Petition for probate and letters testamentary filed | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
023.pdf
A Notice of Appearance filed on November 7, 2019, in the Southern District of New York for Case No. 1:19-cv-09610-PAE (Jane Doe 17 v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein et al.). Attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP formally enters the case to represent the defendants, specifically the estate executors Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, as well as numerous corporate entities associated with Epstein (e.g., Nine East 71st Street Corp, Financial Trust Company, JEGE Inc.).
021.pdf
A legal filing from Troutman Sanders LLP on behalf of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated corporate entities in the case Jane Doe 17 v. Indyke et al. The letter informs Judge Engelmayer of an agreement between parties regarding the acceptance of service and an extension of time until December 21, 2019, for the defendants to respond to the complaint. The judge granted and signed the order on November 5, 2019.
007.pdf
This document is a formal Summons in a Civil Action filed on October 22, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-09610). The plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe 17, is suing the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (represented by Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn) and numerous associated corporate entities (Nine East 71st Street Corp, Laurel Inc, NES LLC, etc.). The summons instructs the defendants to respond within 21 days to avoid a default judgment and lists the plaintiff's legal representation.
005.pdf
This document is a Civil Cover Sheet (Form JS 44) filed on October 18, 2019, in the Southern District of New York for a lawsuit initiated by 'Jane Doe 17' against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and various associated corporate entities. The cause of action is listed as Battery under 18 U.S.C. sections 1591-1595 (statutes relating to sex trafficking and forced labor). The document identifies Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as the personal representatives of the estate and lists several shell companies (like JEGE, Inc. and NES, LLC) as defendants whose addresses were unknown at the time of filing.
002.pdf
This document is a Civil Cover Sheet (Form JS 44) filed on October 17, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff, Jane Doe 17 (a resident of Florida), is suing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (represented by executors Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn) and various associated corporate entities for Battery under federal statutes including 18 USC 1591 (Sex Trafficking). The document lists numerous corporate defendants associated with Epstein (e.g., JEGE Inc., NES LLC) for which the plaintiff's attorney was unable to locate addresses.
071.pdf
This document is a joint status report filed on August 14, 2020, by attorneys for both the Plaintiff (Jane Doe 1000) and the Defendants (Executors of the Epstein Estate). They requested a 45-day extension to the stay of discovery because the Plaintiff had submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program and was awaiting a determination. The document includes a handwritten order by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman dated September 11, 2020, granting the requested extension.
059.pdf
This document is a legal filing from June 3, 2020, submitted by Troutman Sanders LLP to the SDNY Court. It informs Judge Freeman that the Superior Court of the U.S. Virgin Islands has officially granted the motion to establish the 'Epstein Victims' Compensation Program.' The attached exhibit is the Order from the USVI court, signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn P. Hermon-Percell, authorizing the Co-Executors (Indyke and Kahn) to commence the program on or about June 15, 2020, following an agreement with the USVI Attorney General to lift liens to fund the program.
052.pdf
Legal correspondence from Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Freeman regarding the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The defense argues against the Plaintiff's request for a 21-year discovery period, stating the alleged abuse occurred only between 1999 and 2002, and asserts that they are already processing a database of over 730,000 documents. The document mentions that flight logs will be produced if the complaint alleges the Plaintiff traveled on Epstein's plane, but does not contain the logs themselves.
045.pdf
Defense counsel Bennet Moskowitz submits a letter to the Court in the 'Jane Doe 1000' case, attaching a recent Order from Judge Paul Engelmayer in the 'Jane Doe 15' case. The attached Order dismisses Jane Doe 15's claim for punitive damages against the Epstein Estate, ruling that under both New York and New Mexico law, punitive damages cannot be recovered from a deceased tortfeasor's estate. The Order details allegations that Jane Doe 15 was groomed by Epstein's secretary in New York and subsequently abused by Epstein at his New Mexico ranch in 2004.
042.pdf
A letter filed on April 15, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman. The letter requests a 30-day extension on various discovery and filing deadlines in three cases involving the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1000, Teresa Helm, and Juliette Bryant) due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Judge signed and ordered the request on the same day.
034.pdf
This document is a Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, filed by the executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The defendants argue that the plaintiff's claims for battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress, stemming from alleged sexual assaults in 1999, are time-barred by the applicable statutes of limitations in New York and Florida. They further argue that recent New York legislation extending the statute of limitations does not apply retroactively to already expired claims, and that the plaintiff cannot claim equitable tolling or estoppel. Additionally, the defendants assert that punitive damages cannot be recovered from a decedent's estate under New York or Florida law.
033.pdf
This document is a Notice of Motion to Dismiss filed on February 28, 2020, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-10577). The defendants, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein), represented by Troutman Sanders LLP, are moving to dismiss the complaint of Plaintiff Jane Doe 1000 with prejudice pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6).
031.pdf
This document is a letter from attorney Bennet Moskowitz to Judge Lewis J. Liman dated February 14, 2020, in the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The letter requests approval for a briefing schedule regarding an anticipated motion to dismiss, with deadlines set for February, March, and April 2020. The document was endorsed and ordered by Judge Liman on February 18, 2020.
054.pdf
A status update letter dated November 2, 2020, from attorney Mariann Meier Wang to Judge Debra Freeman regarding three civil cases against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Indyke et al.). The letter informs the court that the plaintiffs have registered with the Epstein Victims Compensation Program and requests that the cases remain stayed pending resolution through that program.
051.pdf
A status update letter dated August 14, 2020, from attorney Mariann Meier Wang to Judge Debra Freeman regarding three civil cases against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Indyke et al.). The letter informs the court that the plaintiffs are currently presenting their claims to the Epstein Victims Compensation Program and requests that the court cases remain stayed pending the outcome of this alternative dispute resolution process.
047.pdf
This document is a Joint Stipulation and Order filed in June 2020 in the Southern District of New York, staying the lawsuit brought by Teala Davies against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate. The stay was requested to allow the plaintiff to participate in the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program, a non-adversarial alternative to litigation for resolving sexual abuse claims. Judge Debra C. Freeman signed the order on June 22, 2020, and directed the parties to submit a status report by August 14, 2020.
040.pdf
This document is a legal letter dated April 30, 2020, filed by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP on behalf of the Co-Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn). The letter is addressed to Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman in the case of Teala Davies v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. It serves to supplement a pending motion to dismiss by submitting a recent Opinion & Order from a related case (Jane Doe 15), in which Judge Paul A. Engelmayer dismissed a similar claim for punitive damages against the executors.
040-01.pdf
Court order issued by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on April 30, 2020, granting the defendants' motion to dismiss Jane Doe 15's claim for punitive damages against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff alleged she was groomed by Epstein's secretary in New York and sexually abused by Epstein at his New Mexico ranch in 2004 at age 15. The court ruled that under both New York and New Mexico law, punitive damages cannot be recovered from the estate of a deceased tortfeasor.
039.pdf
A letter dated April 28, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Debra Freeman regarding the case of Teala Davies v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The letter supplements a pending motion to dismiss by submitting a recent Opinion & Order from Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in a related case (Mary Doe v. Indyke et al.), which dismissed punitive damages claims against the Co-Executors.
039-01.pdf
This document is a legal Opinion & Order from the Southern District of New York in the case of Mary Doe v. the Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's Estate. The court granted the executors' motion to dismiss the plaintiff's request for punitive damages. The judge ruled that New York law applies to the case because the torts occurred in New York, and under New York's Estates, Powers and Trusts Law (EPTL § 11-3.2(a)(1)), punitive damages cannot be awarded against the personal representatives of an estate.
038.pdf
A letter motion filed by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz on behalf of the Co-Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) requesting a 30-day extension on various court deadlines due to the pandemic. The request applies to cases involving plaintiffs Jane Doe 15, Mary Doe, and Teala Davies. The motion was endorsed and ordered by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman on April 14, 2020.
037.pdf
A letter dated April 13, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Debra C. Freeman. The letter represents the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (Indyke and Kahn) in lawsuits brought by Jane Doe 15, Mary Doe, and Teala Davies. It requests a 30-day extension for various discovery and filing deadlines due to the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that the Plaintiffs have consented to this request.
028.pdf
This document is a Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order filed in the Southern District of New York for the case of Teala Davies v. The Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Indyke and Kahn). Dated March 16, 2020, it establishes protocols for handling confidential discovery materials, including medical records and financial information, and sets procedures for inadvertent disclosures and sealing documents. It includes a Non-Disclosure Agreement form (Exhibit A) to be signed by third parties accessing confidential information.
026.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss' filed on February 28, 2020, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:19-cv-10788). The defendants, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate), represented by Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP, are moving to dismiss the complaint filed by plaintiff Teala Davies with prejudice.
024.pdf
Legal correspondence from Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Debra C. Freeman dated February 26, 2020, regarding the case Teala Davies v. Indyke et al. The letter requests approval for a briefing schedule concerning a Motion to Dismiss filed by the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. It references prior settlement discussions held during a court conference on February 11, 2020.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity