Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Executor |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
RICHARD D. KAHN
|
Executor |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Litigation |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Litigation |
2
|
2 | |
|
location
Lifestyles Convention
|
Litigation |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Bennet J. Moskowitz
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
George
|
Adversarial regulatory |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Teala Davies
|
Litigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Litigant |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Anastasia Doe
|
Litigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
George
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
Lifestyles Convention
|
Adversarial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
RICHARD D. KAHN
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Teala Davies
|
Adversarial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Teala Davies
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Adversarial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Government of USVI
|
Adversarial litigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
IRS
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Christopher A. Kroblin
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Anastasia Doe
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial plaintiff vs defendant |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-01 | N/A | Plaintiff's Brief in Response to Court Order filed. | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2022-03-04 | N/A | Original Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees was filed. | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2021-03-17 | N/A | Court Order requesting the Estate address whether the case should be designated as complex. | Virgin Islands | View |
| 2021-01-01 | N/A | Sale of Jeffrey Epstein's New York City and Palm Beach residences completed | New York City, Palm Beach | View |
| 2020-06-15 | N/A | Deadline for Defendants to reply | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2020-05-09 | N/A | An Order was entered by the Clerk in the matter of Maxwell v. Estate of Epstein. | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2020-05-01 | N/A | Complaint filed in this action. | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2020-05-01 | N/A | Motion to dismiss filed by Defendants | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2020-04-14 | N/A | General’s Status Report on Voluntary Compensation Program filed. | V.I. Super. Ct. | View |
| 2020-03-24 | N/A | Debt petition docketed and Case Number ST-2020-CV-00155 assigned | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2020-02-28 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss | New York, New York | View |
| 2019-10-22 | N/A | Summons issued and filed. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-10-17 | N/A | Filing of Civil Cover Sheet for Case 1:19-cv-09610-PAE-DCF | SDNY (Manhattan) | View |
| 2019-08-15 | N/A | Petition for probate and letters testamentary filed | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
074.pdf
A legal status report filed on December 1, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz regarding the case 'VE v. Darren Indyke and Richard D. Kahn'. The document informs Judge Debra C. Freeman that the plaintiff (VE) has submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program and has received an award offer which she is considering. The parties request that the court case remain stayed while this settlement process concludes.
073.pdf
This document is a status report letter filed on November 2, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Pepper on behalf of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and the Plaintiff 'VE'. It informs Judge Debra C. Freeman that the Plaintiff has submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program which is currently under review. Consequently, both parties jointly request that the ongoing litigation (Case No. 1:19-cv-07625-AJN-DF) remain stayed to preserve resources and judicial economy.
072.pdf
A legal status report filed on October 1, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz on behalf of the Epstein Estate executors (Indyke and Kahn) and the Plaintiff 'VE'. The letter informs Judge Freeman that the Plaintiff has submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program which is under review, and consequently requests that the civil case remain stayed.
062.pdf
A Notice of Appearance filed on May 12, 2020, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorney Charles L. Glover of Troutman Sanders LLP formally enters his appearance as counsel for the defendants, including the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein's executors (Indyke and Kahn) and associated corporate entities, in a case brought by plaintiff 'VE'.
060.pdf
A letter from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al. The letter serves to supplement a pending motion to dismiss by submitting a recent Opinion & Order from Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in a related case (Mary Doe v. Indyke et al.), which dismissed punitive damages claims against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein's executors. The defense argues this precedent supports dismissing punitive damages in the current action.
054.pdf
This document is a Joint Proposed Discovery Schedule filed on February 6, 2020, in the case of VE v. Indyke et al. It outlines the agreed-upon timeline for the exchange of evidence, including initial disclosures, medical records, and expert reports. The filing identifies the key subjects of discovery as Epstein's alleged torts against the plaintiff, the liability of the corporate defendants, and the plaintiff's damages.
050.pdf
This document is a letter filed on January 2, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter pertains to the case 'VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al.' and requests oral argument on the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Moskowitz represents the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn) and associated entities.
047.pdf
This document is a letter dated December 26, 2019, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It requests a one-week extension (until January 2, 2020) for the defendants, including the Co-Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) and related corporate entities, to file a reply supporting their Motion to Dismiss in the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street. The plaintiff consented to this extension request.
045.pdf
This document is a Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law opposing a Motion to Dismiss in the case of VE v. Indyke et al. The plaintiff, a victim of Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse beginning in 2001 at age 16, argues that the corporate defendants (Nine East 71st Street Corp, Financial Trust Company, and NES LLC) are liable for negligence, negligent security, and negligent supervision. The memorandum asserts these entities were integral to Epstein's sex trafficking enterprise, with employees facilitating the recruitment and scheduling of victims, and argues that claims are valid under the New York Child Victims Act.
039-01.pdf
This document is a blank Non-Disclosure Agreement form filed on December 4, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York regarding Case No. 1:19-cv-07625-AJN (VE v. Indyke et al.). The agreement requires signatories to maintain the confidentiality of the Plaintiff's identity ('VE') in connection with the litigation against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. It stipulates that willful violation of the agreement may result in punishment for contempt of court.
038.pdf
This document is a Memorandum of Law filed on November 29, 2019, by the defendants (Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated corporate entities) in the case VE v. Indyke et al. The defendants move to dismiss several counts of the plaintiff's complaint, arguing that the battery claim is time-barred and not revived by the Child Victims Act because it is distinct from claims under NY Penal Law § 130. Furthermore, they argue that negligence claims against the corporate defendants (Nine East, FTC, and NES) are based on vague, conclusory allegations that fail to establish a duty of care, breach, or proximate cause, and that punitive damages are legally barred against an estate.
037.pdf
This document is a legal declaration filed on November 29, 2019, by Bennet J. Moskowitz, an attorney for the defendants in the case of VE v. Darren K. Indyke, et al. Moskowitz declares his representation of the Co-Executors of the Jeffrey Epstein Estate and associated corporate entities. The declaration serves to submit a copy of the Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint as an exhibit to support the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.
029.pdf
A letter from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting a two-week extension for the Epstein Estate executors and associated entities to respond to a complaint in the case 'VE v. Nine East 71st Street'. The Judge granted the request on November 14, 2019, extending the deadline to November 29, 2019, but handwritten notes explicitly state 'No further extensions'.
028.pdf
This document is a letter from attorney Bradley J. Edwards to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al., dated November 12, 2019. Edwards opposes the Defendants' request for a two-week extension to respond to the complaint, arguing that they have already been granted a 45-day extension and that the upcoming Rule 26(f) conference should proceed. The letter notes that the Defendants' delay is related to a filing in the U.S. Virgin Islands regarding a 'claims resolution program' for the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, which the Plaintiff argues should not halt the current litigation.
027.pdf
A letter from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated November 12, 2019, requesting a two-week extension for the Defendants (Executors of Epstein's Estate and related entities) to respond to the Plaintiff's complaint in the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al. The letter notes that Plaintiff's counsel refused to consent to the extension.
025.pdf
This document is a letter dated October 29, 2019, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter represents the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Indyke and Kahn) and associated corporate entities in the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al. It serves to clarify the record regarding an ex parte order issued in a related case (Katlyn Doe) and requests an extension until November 15, 2019, to respond to the Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed Anonymously.
023.pdf
This document is a civil summons filed on September 26, 2019, in the Southern District of New York for Case 1:19-cv-07625-AJN. The plaintiff, identified as 'VE', is suing several entities including Nine East 71st Street Corporation and Financial Trust Company, Inc., as well as Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The document requires the defendants to serve an answer to the complaint within 21 days to the plaintiff's attorney, J. Stanley Pottinger.
022.pdf
This document is a Summons in a Civil Action filed on September 25, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff, identified as 'VE', is suing several entities including Nine East 71st Street Corporation, Financial Trust Company, Inc., NES, LLC, and the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn). The summons instructs the defendants to respond to the complaint within 21 days.
021.pdf
This document is a legal letter dated September 18, 2019, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It concerns the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al., representing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. The letter confirms an agreement between the parties to accept service of the complaint and extends the defendants' deadline to respond until November 15, 2019; the request was 'So Ordered' by the judge on September 19, 2019.
004.pdf
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on August 20, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:19-cv-07625-AJN). The plaintiff, identified only as 'VE', is requesting permission to proceed anonymously in a lawsuit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. The defendants include Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as representatives of the estate, as well as Nine East 71st Street Corporation, Financial Trust Company, Inc., and NES, LLC.
2023.10.03%20Response.pdf
In this May 2023 filing to the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, a pro se incarcerated Ghislaine Maxwell requests a 180-day stay in her civil suit for indemnification against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. Maxwell argues she needs time to find new counsel following her previous attorney's withdrawal, citing severe communication restrictions and lack of access to legal resources (computers, state case law) within FCI Tallahassee. She also argues the civil case should be paused pending the outcome of her criminal appeal (2nd Circuit Case 22-14626-CR) and cites a 2002 lawsuit (Shanks v. Wexner) as evidence that Epstein historically indemnified her for legal costs.
2023.09.19%20Proposed%20Order.pdf
A court order from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands dated September 19, 2023, dismissing Ghislaine Maxwell's complaint against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein, executors Indyke and Kahn, and NES, LLC. The dismissal was granted based on a failure to prosecute or alternatively to compel the plaintiff to appear pro se. The order is signed by Presiding Judge Harold W.L. Willocks.
2023.03.17%20Hearing%20-%20Record%20Of%20Proceeding.pdf
A Record of Proceedings from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands dated March 17, 2023, regarding a civil debt case (ST-2020-CV-00155) filed by Ghislaine Maxwell against the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. Maxwell appeared pro se for a status conference and confirmed her intent to proceed with the lawsuit while requesting 60 days to find new counsel, which the defense did not oppose. The proceedings lasted from 10:00 a.m. to 10:04 a.m.
2023.02.15%20Order%20Scheduling%20Hearing.pdf
This document is a court order from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands filed on February 15, 2023, in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell v. Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein et al. The order schedules a remote hearing for March 17, 2023, to determine if Maxwell intends to pursue her indemnification claims, noting that her previous attorney withdrew in September 2022 and she has not responded to prior orders. The court directs the order to be sent to FCI Tallahassee, where Maxwell is incarcerated, to facilitate her appearance via Microsoft Teams.
2023.02.15%20Notice%20of%20Entry%20of%20Judgment.pdf
This document is a Notice of Entry of Order from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, filed on February 15, 2023. It notifies Ghislaine Maxwell (Plaintiff) and various attorneys that an order was entered regarding case ST-2020-CV-00155, a debt action against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein, his executors (Indyke and Kahn), and NES, LLC.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity