Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Executor |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
RICHARD D. KAHN
|
Executor |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Litigation |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Litigation |
2
|
2 | |
|
location
Lifestyles Convention
|
Litigation |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Bennet J. Moskowitz
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
George
|
Adversarial regulatory |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Teala Davies
|
Litigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Litigant |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Anastasia Doe
|
Litigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
George
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
Lifestyles Convention
|
Adversarial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
RICHARD D. KAHN
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Teala Davies
|
Adversarial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Teala Davies
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Adversarial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Government of USVI
|
Adversarial litigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
IRS
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Christopher A. Kroblin
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Anastasia Doe
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial plaintiff vs defendant |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-01 | N/A | Plaintiff's Brief in Response to Court Order filed. | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2022-03-04 | N/A | Original Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees was filed. | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2021-03-17 | N/A | Court Order requesting the Estate address whether the case should be designated as complex. | Virgin Islands | View |
| 2021-01-01 | N/A | Sale of Jeffrey Epstein's New York City and Palm Beach residences completed | New York City, Palm Beach | View |
| 2020-06-15 | N/A | Deadline for Defendants to reply | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2020-05-09 | N/A | An Order was entered by the Clerk in the matter of Maxwell v. Estate of Epstein. | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2020-05-01 | N/A | Complaint filed in this action. | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2020-05-01 | N/A | Motion to dismiss filed by Defendants | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2020-04-14 | N/A | General’s Status Report on Voluntary Compensation Program filed. | V.I. Super. Ct. | View |
| 2020-03-24 | N/A | Debt petition docketed and Case Number ST-2020-CV-00155 assigned | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2020-02-28 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss | New York, New York | View |
| 2019-10-22 | N/A | Summons issued and filed. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-10-17 | N/A | Filing of Civil Cover Sheet for Case 1:19-cv-09610-PAE-DCF | SDNY (Manhattan) | View |
| 2019-08-15 | N/A | Petition for probate and letters testamentary filed | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
2022.12.20%20Notice%20-%20Proposed%20Order.pdf
This document is a court order from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands filed on December 20, 2022. It grants a motion filed by the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, to withdraw a previous motion for the award of attorneys' fees.
2022.12.20%20Motion%20-%20Motion.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on December 20, 2022, in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands by the Co-Executors of the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn). They are moving to withdraw a previous motion for attorneys' fees because a resolution was reached in a related case (Govt of USVI v. Epstein Estate et al., ST-2020-CV-00014). The document includes a certificate of service listing government officials and attorneys served with this motion.
2022.03.17-2%20Exhibit%202.pdf
This document is 'Government Exhibit 2' filed in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands on March 17, 2022. It is a detailed legal billing record totaling $112,216.90 for the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, listing work performed by attorneys (Weiner, Heymann, Kroblin, etc.) to oppose the Virgin Islands Government's motions to intervene and freeze estate assets. The document includes the Government's specific objections to these fees, often citing 'Duplication', 'Block Billing', or 'Unrelated Activity' (specifically referencing the Epstein Victims Compensation Program/Fund).
2022.03.17%20%20Notice%20-%20Notice%20to%20the%20Court.pdf
This document is an opposition brief filed by the Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands against the Epstein Estate's request for over $112,000 in attorneys' fees. The Government argues that the Estate is not a 'prevailing party' because the underlying court orders were not final judgments, and that the requested hourly rates (up to $1,315/hr) are excessive compared to the local standard of $350/hr. The filing also references the Government's broader CICO lawsuit alleging Epstein used his VI businesses to transport and abuse victims on Little St. James Island.
2022.03.04%20Motion%20-%20Motion.pdf
This document is a Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees filed by the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands. The Co-Executors are requesting $112,216.90 in fees incurred while successfully defending against the Government of the Virgin Islands' (GVI) attempts to intervene in the probate action and freeze estate assets. The document details the history of the GVI's failed motions, the complex nature of the estate, the funding of the Victims' Compensation Program ($121 million+), and justifies the legal fees based on the attorneys' experience and standard rates.
2021.03.29%20Response%20-%20Response.pdf
This document is a legal response filed by the Co-Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) on March 29, 2021, opposing the US Virgin Islands Government's appeal regarding their failed motion to intervene in probate proceedings. The executors argue the Government's petition is untimely as the original motion was denied over a year prior, and that the Government's emergency motion regarding estate assets is moot because the estate has replenished the Victims' Compensation Program funds. Attached exhibits include the original 2020 opposition brief and a March 2021 press release confirming the sale of Epstein's NYC and Palm Beach properties to fund the compensation program.
050.pdf
This document contains a letter from Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Debra Freeman in the SDNY, dated June 3, 2020, informing the court that the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands has officially authorized the establishment of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. Attached is the official Order from the USVI court (signed by Judge Hermon-Percell) granting the motion to establish the program and authorizing its commencement on June 15, 2020. The document notes that the USVI Attorney General has agreed to lift liens to allow funding for the program.
038.pdf
Legal correspondence from Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Debra C. Freeman dated May 8, 2020. The letter requests the denial of Plaintiffs' (Jane Doe 1000, Teresa Helm, Juliette Bryant) request for a pre-motion conference regarding discovery disputes, characterizing the Plaintiffs' actions as premature and a violation of court rules regarding meet-and-confer obligations. The defense argues that good faith discussions were ongoing and accuses Plaintiffs of rushing to court to distract from their own refusal to produce medical records.
035.pdf
This document is a court filing dated April 28, 2020, submitted by attorneys for the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein to Judge Paul Gardephe in the Teresa Helm case. It encloses a newly issued Opinion & Order by Judge Paul Engelmayer in a separate case (Mary Doe v. Indyke et al.), which grants the Estate's motion to dismiss claims for punitive damages. The court ruled that under New York law (EPTL § 11-3.2(a)(1)) and likely US Virgin Islands common law, punitive damages cannot be recovered from the estate of a deceased tortfeasor because they serve a penal rather than remedial purpose.
034.pdf
A letter from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Debra C. Freeman dated April 15, 2020, requesting a 30-day extension for various deadlines in civil cases filed by Jane Doe 1000, Teresa Helm, and Juliette Bryant against the Epstein Estate executors. The request cites the ongoing pandemic as the reason for the delay and lists specific new dates for discovery and reports, which Judge Freeman approved via a 'SO ORDERED' endorsement on the same day.
019.pdf
Legal correspondence dated February 20, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz (Troutman Sanders LLP) to Judge Paul G. Gardephe regarding the case Teresa Helm v. The Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The letter requests a one-business-day extension for filing the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss due to the attorney's recent illness, adjusting the deadline to February 24, 2020.
026.pdf
This document is the formal Answer and Affirmative Defenses filed by the Co-Executors of the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn) in response to a civil complaint by Annie Farmer. The executors generally deny knowledge of the specific allegations of abuse but admit to certain procedural facts, such as Epstein's arrest date (July 6, 2019), death date (August 10, 2019), and property ownership in NY, NM, USVI, FL, and France. They assert ten affirmative defenses, including failure to state a claim, contributory negligence, assumption of risk, and statute of limitations arguments challenging the New York Child Victims' Act.
024.pdf
Legal correspondence dated March 23, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald. The letter requests a four-day extension to respond to the Plaintiff's Amended Complaint in the case of Maria Farmer v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein, citing logistical difficulties caused by the COVID-19 outbreak and lockdown in the tri-state area.
013.pdf
This document is a legal letter dated January 24, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz (representing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein) to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald. The letter requests a pre-motion conference to move for the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by Maria Farmer. The defense argues that Farmer's claims of assault occurring in Ohio in 1995/1996 are time-barred under both New York and Ohio statutes of limitations and that her arguments for tolling (based on Epstein's later criminal indictment or equitable estoppel) are legally insufficient. It also argues that punitive damages cannot be awarded against an estate.
052.pdf
This document is a legal stipulation filed on November 5, 2021, in the Southern District of New York, regarding case 1:20-cv-02365-LJL-DCF. The plaintiff, 'Jane Doe,' voluntarily dismisses her claims with prejudice against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn. The dismissal is agreed upon by counsel for both parties without costs to either side.
049.pdf
This document is a legal letter dated September 10, 2021, filed by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Pepper on behalf of the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn). The letter is addressed to Judge Debra C. Freeman regarding the case 'Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn' (Case 1:20-cv-02365). The defense informs the court that they are working jointly with the Plaintiff to settle the matter out of court and requests a sixty-day stay of proceedings until November 9, 2021.
044.pdf
A letter from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Debra C. Freeman dated August 26, 2021, regarding the case Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn. The letter requests the withdrawal of a previously filed Joint Proposed Discovery Schedule (ECF No. 40) because it contained incorrect signature and contact information for the Plaintiff's counsel.
042.pdf
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York dated August 26, 2021, in the civil case of Jane Doe v. Indyke and Kahn. The order grants a motion for attorney Mary 'Molly' S. DiRago of Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP to appear pro hac vice as counsel for the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate. It is signed by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman.
033.pdf
Legal correspondence dated August 13, 2021, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Debra C. Freeman regarding the case of Jane Doe v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The letter requests permission to file a redacted statement concerning the Plaintiff's application to proceed anonymously. While the Co-Executors (Indyke and Kahn) do not oppose the anonymity, they wish to present specific material facts relevant to the application for the Court's consideration.
029.pdf
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on July 30, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cv-02365). Plaintiff Jane Doe is notifying the defendants (Executors of the Epstein Estate and various associated corporate entities) that she is moving the court for an order allowing her to proceed anonymously in the lawsuit.
028.pdf
This document is a legal letter dated June 30, 2021, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Debra C. Freeman regarding the case Jane Doe v. Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The letter requests the lifting of a stay on the proceedings. A court order is superimposed on the document, dated July 22, 2021, which grants the request, lifts the stay, sets deadlines for filings, and schedules a telephonic pretrial conference for August 26, 2021.
027.pdf
This document is a legal letter filed on July 21, 2021, in the case of Jane Doe v. the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. Plaintiff's attorney, Daniel J. Kaiser, requests a one-week extension from Judge Debra C. Freeman to submit a motion for the Plaintiff to proceed anonymously, citing a scheduling conflict with an arbitration. The letter notes that the Defendants consent to this extension request.
026.pdf
A letter dated June 30, 2021, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Pepper to Judge Debra C. Freeman regarding the case Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein). The letter informs the court that the Plaintiff wishes to lift the stay on the action and outlines agreed-upon deadlines for the Defendants to respond to the complaint and for the Plaintiff to file a motion regarding anonymity.
025.pdf
A status report filed on June 1, 2021, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz on behalf of the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Indyke and Kahn) in the case brought by Jane Doe. The letter informs Judge Freeman that the Plaintiff has submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. The parties jointly request that the civil case remain stayed while the compensation claim is considered, noting that a resolution via the Program would lead to the discontinuation of the lawsuit.
023.pdf
A status report filed on April 1, 2021, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz representing the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Indyke and Kahn) in a civil suit brought by a Jane Doe. The letter informs Judge Freeman that the Plaintiff has submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. The parties request that the civil case remain stayed while the compensation claim is considered, noting that a resolution through the Program would lead to the discontinuation of the lawsuit.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity