Recipient
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
sender
|
Business associate |
22
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
sender
|
Friend |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Sender (AUSA)
|
Business associate |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
sender
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Author
|
Friend |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Joshn castrucci
|
Employee |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
eileen
|
Employee |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Brad
|
Employee |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
e:jeeitunes@gmail.com
|
Correspondent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
jeffrey E.
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Fuller
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sender (Likely Epstein)
|
Social professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
EST
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Melanie
|
Professional informational |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert Kuhn
|
Professional collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
CFI
|
Board member |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Center for Inquiry
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Author
|
Professional collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Joslin
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Brad
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jackie Martling
|
Newsletter subscriber correspondent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Invesco
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Conversation in dining room regarding upfront advisory fees. | Sender's dining room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cleanup of 'Carlyn's mess' costing 30 million dollars. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Data entry of MDS codes | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lunch with Jacques Lang | Paris (possibly Lang's home) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cleaning up Carlyn's mess | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Proposed visit by Recipient and Soon Yi to Boston to see Lisa, Larry, and Jeffrey. | Boston/Harvard | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dire circumstances faced by the recipient. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cleaning up 'Carlyn's mess' | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting in the author's dining room regarding payment of advisory fees. | Dining Room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filming from a helicopter. | Helicopter | View |
| N/A | N/A | Substitution of Barry as trustee. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sender telling Recipient they could do better than Halperin. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal action | Grand jury subpoenas were issued to an entity referred to as 'Recipient'. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Information transfer | The Recipient turned over certain materials covered by the protective order to the Government. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Action in a legal case | The Recipient turned over certain materials covered by the protective order to the Government as ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Transfer of materials | As a result of the modification by Court-1, the Recipient turned over certain materials covered b... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Estate plan refresh | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Scouting events | Various countries | View |
| N/A | N/A | Inappropriate comments to a student regarding dating | Case Western Reserve Univer... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting in author's dining room regarding advisory fees | Author's dining room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Proposal for a TV series collaboration | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting in author's dining room regarding upfront fee payments. | Author's Dining Room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Proposed gathering involving the sender, recipient, Ehud, Steve, and potentially Bill Clinton. | Not specified | View |
| 2025-12-01 | N/A | Priority list request | N/A | View |
| 2025-11-22 | N/A | Discussion between Elisa New and the recipient regarding the course and poetry. | Unknown | View |
EFTA00036567.pdf
This document is an internal email sent on August 13, 2019, three days after Jeffrey Epstein's death. The sender is seeking confirmation that all posts in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) were filled on August 9th and 10th. The stated purpose is to prepare talking points to refute media claims ('combat sound bite') that staffing shortages contributed to the suicide.
EFTA00036372.pdf
A brief correspondence from an individual located at FCI Memphis to a recipient addressed as 'Bro'. The sender offers support and states that the recipient and their staff are in their thoughts and prayers. The sender's identity is redacted.
EFTA00035536.pdf
An internal email dated July 24, 2019, reminding a staff member to input a 'GAN' (General Activity Note) regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The email notes that Epstein was placed on 'Watch' the previous day (July 23), following an on-call phone conversation. This corresponds with the timeline of Epstein's first suicide attempt/incident in MCC New York.
EFTA00034071.pdf
An internal email dated July 24, 2019, sent between likely correctional staff members. The sender requests a 'cutter' (likely a rescue tool/hook knife used for ligature cutting), referencing an 'incident w/Epstein' that occurred the previous night (July 23). The sender notes they attempted to retrieve a cutter from 'the cage' during the incident but found none available. This corresponds to the reported July 23 incident where Epstein was found semi-conscious in his cell.
EFTA00030999.pdf
An email dated June 11, 2021, from a reviewer working on the 'WBTW' (We Build The Wall) case responsiveness review. The sender notifies a colleague (who is working on 'both cases') that a photo of Donald Trump and Ghislaine Maxwell was discovered on Steve Bannon's iPhone 7 using Cellebrite forensic software.
EFTA00030587.pdf
An email dated August 22, 2014, in which a redacted sender (likely a victim) informs a redacted recipient that the Wilton Manors Police Department has no records of them, Ron Eppinger, or an individual named Charlie. The sender speculates records may have been destroyed because they were a minor at the time and expresses a strong desire to find this information to help 'other victims and future victims'.
EFTA00029165.pdf
This document is an email dated August 22, 2021, between members of a legal team regarding 'GM discovery production' (likely Ghislaine Maxwell). The sender instructs the recipient to extract photographs from an attached defense submission (dated 2019-12-13) for production, explicitly noting to exclude a photograph of deposition testimony found on page 5.
EFTA00024627.pdf
This document is a FedEx invoice dated October 27, 2003, billed to Jeffrey E. Epstein for a total of $594.99 covering 12 shipments. One specific shipment record is visible (Tracking ID 838295056769), involving a 'FedEx Standard Overnight' envelope sent by Epstein on October 16, 2003, which experienced a weather delay before delivery on October 20, 2003. Approximately four pages of the document (Pages 5-8) are completely redacted, obscuring the details of the remaining 11 shipments.
EFTA00024405.pdf
A screenshot of a violent and abusive social media message thread from user 'Trev Trey' to an unidentified recipient. The sender threatens the recipient and their wife, accusing the wife of being an enabler and pedophile who will soon be indicted based on the testimony of victims ('lil girls who are grown up now'). The document bears the Bates stamp EFTA00024405, typical of evidence files in the Epstein/Maxwell litigation.
EFTA00022164.pdf
An internal email dated December 10, 2019, with the subject 'Epstein/JPM'. The sender informs colleagues of a scheduled call with the British regulator (FCA), who is investigating Jes Staley's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The email notes that the company intends to request the FCA not make the investigation 'overt anytime soon.'
EFTA00019171.pdf
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in West Palm Beach regarding press contact from an individual named Sarnoff. Sarnoff claims to be producing a documentary and book about Jeffrey Epstein using a modeling agency to traffic underage girls into the US. The email notes that the FBI had previously attempted to interview Sarnoff's source without success and that Sarnoff is currently dissatisfied with the FBI's requirement that the source come forward to be interviewed.
EFTA00014540.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 2019 between an attorney representing victims (Jane Doe 1 and 2) and likely prosecutors or investigators. The discussion centers on the legal argument that the Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) does not extend to New York, a key point in the prosecution of Epstein. The attorney updates the recipients on recent filings in the Florida CVRA case, specifically mentioning motions by Epstein's lawyer, Marty Weinberg, and coordinates a phone call to discuss Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) expertise.
DOJ-OGR-00019443.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from March 2, 2020, outlines a procedural history involving civil protective orders in a criminal case. In 2019, the Government successfully modified a protective order in one court (Court-1) to obtain materials from a 'Recipient' for a grand jury, while another court (Court-2) denied a similar request. The current court is now permitting the Defendant, who learned of this through discovery, to provide this sealed information to Court-1 and Court-2 so those courts can determine whether to unseal related materials.
DOJ-OGR-00019442.jpg
This document is page 3 of a court order filed on September 2, 2020, in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The Court denies the Defendant's request to modify a protective order to disclose documents to judicial officers in other civil proceedings, characterizing her arguments as 'vague, speculative, and conclusory.' The text references factual information the Defendant wished to disclose, specifically regarding grand jury subpoenas issued to an unnamed entity ('Recipient') during the Government's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirators.
DOJ-OGR-00019370.jpg
This document, dated September 16, 2020, details legal proceedings involving Maxwell and the Government. It discusses Maxwell's motion to modify protective orders and the Government's opposition, which revealed a grand jury investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and his possible co-conspirators. The Government issued subpoenas to a 'Recipient' and applied ex parte in February 2019 to modify protective orders to ensure compliance with these subpoenas, without notifying Maxwell or her counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00019338.jpg
This legal document, dated August 21, 2020, is a submission from the Acting United States Attorney and Assistant United States Attorneys to Honorable Alison J. Nathan. It argues against the defendant's application to use criminal discovery materials in civil cases, asserting that the application lacks legal justification, attempts to circumvent a protective order, and is irrelevant to the civil litigation. The document suggests the defendant's intent is to falsely accuse the Government and another party.
DOJ-OGR-00019331.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, outlines a procedural history concerning sealed information from civil matters. The Government successfully modified a protective order in one court (Court-1) but not another (Court-2) to obtain materials for a grand jury investigation, which were then turned over by a 'Recipient'. The current court is now permitting the Defendant, who learned of this through discovery, to provide the sealed information back to Court-1 and Court-2 for their own determination of relevance.
DOJ-OGR-00019660.jpg
This document is page 14 of a legal filing (Case 20-3061) dated October 8, 2020. It argues that the government fails to acknowledge that Ms. Maxwell is prohibited by a protective order (upheld by Judge Nathan) from disclosing specific details. These prohibited disclosures include the identity of a 'Recipient,' materials obtained by the government, details about the bulk of the case against her, and why 'Court-2' declined a government request; all specific details regarding these points are heavily redacted.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026151.jpg
This document is page 18 of a larger file (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026151) containing a business proposal from an individual named Yannis. The text outlines a plan to acquire 90% of a bank's shares for approximately EUR 110 million, with the EBRD retaining 10%, projecting an Internal Rate of Return (IRR) greater than 25%. Yannis proposes managing the bank in exchange for 'sweat equity' and suggests upcoming meetings with the EBRD and BNP to advance the deal.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012020.jpg
A letter from Jeff Fuller, President of MC2 Model Management USA, to a business partner (likely Jean-Luc Brunel given the MC2/Epstein context, though unnamed here). Fuller expresses deep concern that negative information about the partner on the internet is damaging the company's global brand. He urges the partner to get the information offline to repair their reputation and suggests seeking professional help for depression.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027222.jpg
This document contains a log of emails sent by Jeffrey Epstein (via jeeitunes@gmail.com) on March 29, 2017. Epstein is advising an unknown recipient on a 'new frankly brilliant strategy' involving US think tanks. He suggests a meeting with Tom Pritzker (Chairman of CSIS), whom he describes as 'like family,' and mentions his own past membership in the Trilateral Commission.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027213.jpg
This document is a log of text messages from March 15, 2017, originating from a House Oversight Committee investigation. A redacted sender expresses dissatisfaction with 'BG world' (likely referring to Bill Gates) and mentions working at 'bgc3'. The sender discusses potential career moves, specifically asking if they should join 'Boris' (likely Boris Nikolic) who is venturing into 'brain space' (neuroscience).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023305.jpg
This document is a highly critical letter (likely from Jeffrey Epstein to Leon Black, based on context cues like 'Judy Black' and 'Phaidon') regarding the mismanagement of the recipient's financial affairs, estate planning, and business ventures. The author critiques the recipient's staff (specifically Brad), highlights chaotic accounting (Regan Arts, Artspace), and proposes a restructuring of trusts, wills, and tax strategies. The letter concludes with a dispute over a significant advisory fee ($50-60 million), where the author expresses disappointment that the agreed terms for compensation were changed unilaterally.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023240.jpg
A contentious correspondence, likely from a legal or financial advisor to a client (contextually Jeffrey Epstein), refusing further work until overdue compensation is paid. The author outlines a chaotic financial situation ('procrastination produced mess'), advises shutting down entities like Regan Arts and Artspace, criticizes current staff (Joslin, Castrucci), and proposes a restructuring plan involving a new trustee named Barry. The text also references 'Donald's' tax plans complicating the author's work and mentions a fee dispute involving a $40m/year limit.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015326.jpg
This document appears to be an excerpt from a letter or draft written by a self-described 'stand-up satirist' to an unknown political figure. It discusses controversies surrounding Colin Powell, specifically his relationship with Dick Cheney and his stance on gays in the military. The text concludes with a satirical joke comparing the 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' policy to historical racial segregation in the Army. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Recipient | Author | $20,000,000.00 | Amount offered/paid: 'only 20m would be paid' | View |
| N/A | Paid | Recipient | sender | $40,000,000.00 | Annual fee for services ('artwork'), offered to... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Recipient | sender | $40,000,000.00 | Demanded annual fee ('usual 40 million per year'). | View |
| N/A | Paid | Recipient | Author | $50,000,000.00 | Fee amount: '50 - 60 million price was attached... | View |
| N/A | Received | Unknown | Recipient | $11,000,000.00 | Found in dormant accounts | View |
| N/A | Paid | Recipient | Author | $30,000,000.00 | Fee outstanding until March | View |
| N/A | Paid | Recipient | sender | $25,000,000.00 | Upfront payment required upon signing agreement. | View |
| N/A | Paid | Recipient | sender | $0.00 | Dispute over 'non - full payment' and an 'end o... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Recipient | Author | $50,000,000.00 | Original agreed fee (50-60 million) for advisor... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Recipient | Various/Settlement | $30,000,000.00 | Cost associated with 'cleaning up Carlyn's mess'. | View |
| N/A | Paid | Recipient | sender | $25,000,000.00 | Upfront payment required upon signing agreement. | View |
| N/A | Paid | Recipient | Author | $20,000,000.00 | Reduced fee offered/paid to author. | View |
| N/A | Paid | Recipient | Joslin | $300,000.00 | Salary range under 300k, which sender thought w... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Recipient | Author | $25,000,000.00 | Initial payment required upon signing agreement. | View |
| N/A | Paid | Recipient | Various unnamed g... | $3,000,000.00 | Combined overhead of less than 3 million dollar... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Recipient | sender | $0.00 | Disputed fee percentage. Sender claims: '37 per... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Recipient | sender | $0.00 | Dispute over 'non-full payment' and valuation o... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Recipient | Regan Arts | $9,800,000.00 | Investment amount mentioned, with note that no ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Eileen's Drawer | Recipient | $4,000,000.00 | Cash/Check found in a drawer. | View |
| N/A | Paid | Recipient | Writer | $40,000,000.00 | Demanded annual fee ('usual 40 million per year'). | View |
| N/A | Paid | Recipient | Writer | $25,000,000.00 | Upfront payment upon signing agreement. | View |
| N/A | Received | Tax deductions | Recipient | $8,000,000.00 | Deductions created by sender. | View |
| N/A | Received | Mistakes | Recipient | $500,000.00 | Mistakes found/corrected by sender. | View |
| N/A | Paid | Recipient | Sender (implied) | $40,000,000.00 | Reference to a limit of '40m per year' regardin... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Recipient | sender | $35,000,000.00 | Discounted annual fee proposal. | View |
Meeting
Recipient traveled to see the sender.
Timber
Reference to '60- 50 40 timber emails'.
Confidentiality Notice
Legal disclaimer regarding attorney-client privilege and property of Jeffrey Epstein. Contact jeevacation@gmail.com if received in error.
Unknown
Email after email saying 'I take no responsibility for him [Joshn Castrucci]'.
Request for Comment
List of points regarding Epstein connections and allegations, asking for clarification.
Legal Notice
Standard confidentiality and attorney-client privilege warning directing errors to jeevacation@gmail.com.
Investigation into Jeffrey Epstein
Demand for materials responsive to the grand jury investigation.
N/A
Complaints about staff, unpaid compensation, and estate mismanagement.
Unknown
Hypothetical scenario where AI suggests what to talk about in an email.
Investigation into Jeffrey Epstein
Request for materials responsive to the investigation.
Eileen's performance
Annoying calls made immediately after bad info was provided.
Eileen's performance
Complaints about Eileen providing bad info.
Confidentiality Notice
Legal disclaimer stating the email is property of JEE and directing errors to jeevacation@gmail.com.
Third Party Candidate Strategy
References prior discussions: 'As we have discussed narrow path...'
No Subject
Discussion about upfront advisory fees; Recipient appeared offended.
Epstein Controversy
Comment stating support for Epstein: 'I support a man whose character I believe I know.'
N/A
Text changing mind about hiring Castrucci.
Management and Fees
The current document discussing personnel management, fees, and past work.
Unknown
Stating that if you save a great deal of money, you wont want to pay.
No Subject
Agreed to 50% of Phaidon payout
Phaidon payout
Agreed to 50% of Phaidon payout.
Personnel
Recipient told Author that Joshn Castrucci was gone.
RE: CACI document scanning 15JA5421F00000068 US v. Maxwel...
Confirming no boxes were sent to CACI and asking to close the contract due to no billable expenses.
CACI document scanning 15JA5421F00000068 US v. Maxwell Ep...
Inquiring if the scanning service for Maxwell/Epstein case is still needed as no invoices were received.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity