DOJ-OGR-00019660.jpg
460 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / appellate brief fragment
File Size:
460 KB
Summary
This document is page 14 of a legal filing (Case 20-3061) dated October 8, 2020. It argues that the government fails to acknowledge that Ms. Maxwell is prohibited by a protective order (upheld by Judge Nathan) from disclosing specific details. These prohibited disclosures include the identity of a 'Recipient,' materials obtained by the government, details about the bulk of the case against her, and why 'Court-2' declined a government request; all specific details regarding these points are heavily redacted.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the criminal matter and protective order; restricted from disclosing specific information.
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Made a decision declining to modify the protective order.
|
| Recipient | Unknown/Redacted |
Identity is protected by order; Maxwell cannot disclose who this is.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Court-2 |
Denied relief in another case; declined a government request.
|
|
| Government |
Opposing party in the case; obtained material and made requests to Court-2.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice, indicated by footer DOJ-OGR.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Relationships (2)
Judge Nathan made a decision declining to modify a protective order governing Maxwell.
Reference to 'government's criminal case against Ms. Maxwell'.
Key Quotes (3)
"Maxwell 'learned of this information (sealed by other courts) as a result of Rule 16 discovery in this criminal matter.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019660.jpg
Quote #1
"What the government doesn’t acknowledge is that, under the protective order and Judge Nathan’s decision declining to modify it, Ms. Maxwell cannot: Disclose who the 'Recipient' is"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019660.jpg
Quote #2
"Disclose that the bulk of the government’s criminal case against Ms. Maxwell [REDACTED]"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019660.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (895 characters)
Case 20-3061, Document 94, 10/08/2020, 2948481, Page14 of 23
covered by a protective order, that Court-2 subsequently denied similar relief in another case, and that Maxwell “learned of this information (sealed by other courts) as a result of Rule 16 discovery in this criminal matter.”
Ans.Br. 27 (quoting App. 101–02). If only it were so simple.
What the government doesn’t acknowledge is that, under the protective order and Judge Nathan’s decision declining to modify it, Ms. Maxwell cannot:
• Disclose who the “Recipient” is [REDACTED]
[REDACTED];
[REDACTED];
• Disclose what material the government obtained [REDACTED]
[REDACTED];
[REDACTED];
• Disclose that the bulk of the government’s criminal case against Ms. Maxwell [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED];
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED];
• Disclose why [REDACTED] (Court-2) declined the government’s [REDACTED] request [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]; or
[REDACTED]; or
11
DOJ-OGR-00019660
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document