Kate
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Farmer
|
Witness comparison |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Disputed association |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
witness
|
Identity alias |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Long term association |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Witness subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E EPSTEIN
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed man
|
Romantic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Facilitator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Adversarial witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein Victim Compensation Fund
|
Beneficiary |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Aznaran
|
Investigative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Defendant witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Seal
|
Alleged professional connection |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed prominent older British gentleman
|
Romantic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim accuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Cooperating witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kate's counsel
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Complex |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Unspecified |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Facilitator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E EPSTEIN
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Adversarial victim witness vs defendant |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Cross-examination of witness Kate in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Cross-examination | Cross-examination of Kate regarding money for therapy and her acquaintance with Ray Hamilton. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Redirect examination of witness McHugh concerning the testimony of Kate and a prior court ruling. | Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Identification of Government Exhibit 16 (GX16) | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Cross-examination of witness Kate regarding her involvement in a publicized scandal. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | The current trial where Ms. Moe is giving a summation. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of a witness named Kate regarding an exhibit identified as 'Defendant's K9'. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Cross-examination | Ms. Sternheim cross-examines the witness, Kate, in court. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Direct examination of witness 'Kate' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Kate provides direct testimony in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Testimony | A witness named Kate testified in the morning session of the court hearing. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Direct examination of a witness named Aznaran in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Trial | A court trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) where Ms. Comey is delivering a rebuttal argument. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A court session where government exhibits were admitted into evidence and a witness was called to... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Witness testimony | A witness identified as 'Kate' is called by the government and sworn in to testify. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Redirect examination of witness Kate regarding her prior public statements. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Cross-examination of a witness named Kate regarding her application for a U visa. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A court trial, specifically the cross-examination of a witness named Kate, is taking a lunch break. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of a witness named Kate regarding her correspondence with Jeffrey Epstein. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Cross-examination | A cross-examination of a witness named Kate regarding her knowledge of therapeutic resources and ... | Courtroom or deposition set... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Cross-examination | A witness named Kate is questioned about the timeline of her contact with an unnamed male and her... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Kate as part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of a witness named Kate regarding the basis for her visa, specifically her clai... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Direct examination of a witness named Kate regarding conversations she had with Maxwell about Eps... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | A witness named Kate provides testimony under direct examination regarding her encounters with Ep... | Court | View |
DOJ-OGR-00018366.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial), filed on August 10, 2022. It details the beginning of the direct examination of a witness using the pseudonym 'Kate' to protect her privacy. The prosecutor, Ms. Pomerantz, requests the jury look at Government Exhibit 16, which is noted as being under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00018364.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The court admits a series of redacted government exhibits into evidence and the government calls its next witness, 'Kate', who will testify under a pseudonym. The judge provides a limiting instruction to the jury regarding Kate's upcoming testimony about her interactions with the defendant and a 'Mr. Epstein'.
DOJ-OGR-00018354.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a sidebar conference where prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach objects to the defense's intention to ask the upcoming witness, 'Kate,' to identify her personal counsel in the courtroom. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim argues that if a witness brings counsel for support, it is relevant and 'fair game' for cross-examination.
DOJ-OGR-00018340.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between a judge and two lawyers, Mr. Rohrbach and Mr. Everdell. The conversation focuses on refining the language of a limiting instruction for a jury. The instruction pertains to testimony from a witness named Kate about alleged sexual conduct with someone named Epstein, with the judge clarifying that the government is specifically directed not to inquire about details unless the defense opens the door to such questions.
DOJ-OGR-00018339.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Judge is addressing a government request regarding the testimony of a witness using the pseudonym 'Kate.' The Judge notes that while Kate alleges sexual conduct with Jeffrey Epstein, she was over the age of consent at the time and is not a victim of the specific crimes charged in this indictment. However, her testimony is deemed relevant to Mann Act counts and 404(b) evidence. The Judge rules that her testimony regarding sexual details will be limited to avoid prejudice and that the jury will be instructed that the Court prohibited asking for those specific details.
DOJ-OGR-00015135.jpg
This legal document, page 3 of a filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, summarizes the evidence from Ghislaine Maxwell's trial, which concluded on December 29, 2021, with her conviction on five counts. It details testimony from four victims (Jane, Kate, Annie, Carolyn) and other evidence establishing Maxwell's instrumental role in Jeffrey Epstein's decade-long scheme to sexually abuse underage girls. The document also references post-trial motions, appeals, and the separate dismissal of perjury charges against Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00014811.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 22, 2022, detailing a portion of a legal proceeding. The court confirms a previously established anonymity order for a witness using the pseudonym "Kate," specifically instructing sketch artists not to draw an exact likeness. Kate then begins her victim impact statement, expressing fear for her daughter's safety in the context of eroding women's rights and referencing a collective effort to bring a "common enemy" to justice.
DOJ-OGR-00014803.jpg
This document is a page from the sentencing hearing transcript of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecutor, Ms. Moe, begins her argument for a significant prison sentence by recounting the abuse of victims Jane, Kate, Annie, Virginia, Carolyn, and Melissa starting in 1994.
DOJ-OGR-00014763.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding, dated August 22, 2022, in which a judge overrules several objections. The objections concern evidence from a 2005 search of Epstein's Palm Beach residence indicating additional minor victims, the defendant's responsibility for these victims, and the inclusion of a victim impact statement from a person named Kate. The judge confirms that with certain redactions, the defense no longer objects to Kate's statement.
DOJ-OGR-00014759.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 22, 2022, in which the judge overrules objections from the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell). The court finds by a preponderance of evidence that the defendant personally recruited Virginia (Giuffre) while she was a minor to provide sexualized massages to Epstein, was aware of the sexual nature of these acts, and used monetary incentives to encourage Virginia to recruit another minor, Carolyn. The judge cites testimony from witnesses Annie, Jane, Kate, and Mr. Alessi, as well as flight records.
DOJ-OGR-00014758.jpg
This page is a transcript from the sentencing phase of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated August 22, 2022. The judge rules on defense objections regarding the Presentence Investigation Report (PSR) concerning three specific individuals: Jane, Kate, and Annie. The court affirms that testimony showed Maxwell facilitated sexual acts for Jane and recruited Kate for massages, but agrees to amend the record to state Kate was above the age of consent.
DOJ-OGR-00014757.jpg
This document is page 10 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 22, 2022. The Court makes findings on disputed issues, concluding that Virginia was paid to recruit girls just as Carolyn was. The Judge also overrules defense objections regarding the inclusion of an individual named 'Kate' and the characterization of the defendant 'grooming' a victim named 'Jane.'
DOJ-OGR-00014750.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the sentencing hearing of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on August 22, 2022. The Court lists various documents reviewed for sentencing, including support letters for Maxwell, a forensic psychiatric evaluation, a letter from an MDC inmate regarding Maxwell's tutoring, and numerous victim impact statements from individuals including Annie Farmer, Virginia Giuffre, and Sarah Ransome. Counsel for both sides confirm the record of submissions before the court.
DOJ-OGR-00008591.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) detailing overt acts for Counts Three and Five of an indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists specific allegations of sexual abuse and recruitment involving minors named Jane and Carolyn between 1994 and 2004 in New York and Florida. The document is heavily edited with strike-throughs, notably removing allegations related to victims named Annie and Kate, and adjusting the age of victims from 17 to 18.
DOJ-OGR-00008590.jpg
This document is a page from jury instructions (Instruction No. 36) in a federal criminal case, filed on December 18, 2021. It details the 'overt act' element required to prove a conspiracy charge, listing specific allegations from the indictment against conspirators Maxwell and Epstein. The alleged overt acts, occurring between 1994 and 2002, involve the sexual abuse and exploitation of underage victims identified as Jane, Annie, Kate, and Carolyn across multiple locations including New York, Florida, New Mexico, and London.
DOJ-OGR-00008508.jpg
This document is page 52 of a legal filing from December 17, 2021, in the case against Ms. Maxwell. It contains jury instructions regarding the legal definition and requirements for proving an "overt act" as part of a conspiracy. The instructions clarify that the government does not need to prove Maxwell herself committed the act, that the act does not have to be one specifically listed in the indictment, and that a conviction on certain counts cannot be based solely on the testimony of a witness named Kate.
DOJ-OGR-00008507.jpg
This legal document, part of an indictment, details overt acts related to a criminal case against Epstein and Maxwell. It outlines specific instances between 1994 and 2004 where they allegedly conspired to recruit and sexually abuse several minors, identified as Jane, Annie, Kate, and Carolyn, in various locations including New York, Florida, New Mexico, and London. The document describes methods of enticement, such as arranging travel and providing cash payments, and alleges that one victim, Carolyn, was also encouraged to recruit other girls.
DOJ-OGR-00008506.jpg
This document outlines Jury Instruction No. 36 regarding the 'Third Element' of a conspiracy charge, specifically requiring proof of an 'overt act.' It details specific allegations from the indictment against Maxwell involving Epstein and victims identified as Jane, Annie, Kate, and Carolyn across various years and locations.
DOJ-OGR-00008434.jpg
This document is a legal letter filed on December 18, 2021, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense requests permission for a witness, Mr. Hamilton, to testify remotely from London via WebEx because he has tested positive for COVID-19 and cannot travel. The defense argues that precluding his testimony would violate Maxwell's constitutional rights to present a defense and confront accusers, specifically mentioning the need to expose the bias of an accuser named Kate.
DOJ-OGR-00008433.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated December 15, 2021, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It presents defense arguments supporting the admissibility of testimony from a witness named Mr. Hamilton regarding statements made by 'Kate,' arguing that this evidence proves bias and is not a collateral matter. The text cites various legal precedents to refute the government's objections.
DOJ-OGR-00008431.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated December 15, 2021, from defense attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter is a response to the government's motion to prevent a witness, Alexander Hamilton, from testifying about four specific topics related to an individual named 'Kate'. The defense argues that providing Hamilton's declaration to the government under Rule 26.2 does not obligate them to introduce all of its contents as evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00008379.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against the defendant's proposal to call Brad Edwards, counsel for a witness named Kate, to testify. The filing asserts that Edwards' testimony about providing a U-Visa application for Kate is irrelevant for impeachment because it is consistent with Kate's own testimony and does not constitute 'powerful evidence of motive of bias' as the defense claims.
DOJ-OGR-00008369.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 14, 2021, argues for the questioning of attorney Brad Edwards regarding a U-Visa application he submitted for his client, Kate. The filing asserts that Kate denied seeking a U-Visa during cross-examination, making her attorney's actions relevant to her motive and bias as a witness. The document contends that this action is not protected by attorney-client privilege, or if it was, the privilege was waived.
DOJ-OGR-00021075.jpg
This document is page 28 of a legal appellate brief filed on February 28, 2023, arguing that all counts against Ghislaine Maxwell should be dismissed based on the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between the Government and Jeffrey Epstein. It claims the NPA immunized Maxwell as a 'potential co-conspirator' and cites Supreme Court precedent requiring prosecutors to fulfill plea agreement promises. Additionally, the text argues jury prejudice occurred due to media interviews given by accusers named Carolyn and Kate.
DOJ-OGR-00021069.jpg
This legal document summarizes testimony from two witnesses, Kate and Annie Farmer, regarding their interactions with Maxwell and Epstein. Kate testified that Maxwell introduced her to Epstein, leading to sexual activity during massages, while Annie Farmer testified about being introduced to Epstein by her sister, being inappropriately touched by him, and later receiving a massage from Maxwell. The document concludes by noting a jury instruction that the physical contact described was not considered “illegal sexual activity” in the context of the indictment.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Government/State ... | Kate | $0.00 | Public assistance received by Kate while she wa... | View |
| N/A | Received | The fund (Victims... | Kate | $3,250,000.00 | Payout received by Kate shortly before she clos... | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein Victim Co... | Kate | $0.00 | Awards received from the compensation fund. | View |
| N/A | Received | CIA | Kate | $0.00 | Employment income (implied by 'employed'). | View |
| N/A | Received | The Fund (Epstein... | Kate | $0.00 | Ms. Sternheim questions Kate about 'money you r... | View |
| N/A | Received | the government | Kate | $0.00 | Public assistance/benefits sought by the witnes... | View |
| 2021-08-01 | Received | Epstein Victim Co... | Kate | $0.00 | Settlement money received regarding connection ... | View |
General life updates and invitations
The witness (Kate) testifies that she communicated with Maxwell by phone. Maxwell would ask about her life, if she was dating, and if she wanted to visit. Sexual topics were not discussed on the phone.
No Subject
The document states that what is 'really telling is the emails that she sent to Jeffrey Epstein'.
Her life
Kate confirms she has spoken to a number of tabloids and magazines throughout the year and has been featured in news articles.
Maxwell's personal life, relationships, and her boyfriend...
Maxwell told Kate 'amazing things' about her boyfriend, describing him as a philanthropist who liked to help young people, and suggested it would be wonderful for Kate to meet him.
Obtaining drugs
Kate confirms she had a recorded conversation with a male acquaintance, asking him to get her drugs. This conversation was later publicized in a British tabloid.
Reporting abuse by Ghislaine Maxwell
Kate reached out to attorney Brad Edwards when her daughter was 1 or 2 to tell him the full extent of the manipulation and abuse instigated by Ghislaine Maxwell.
Unknown
General contact mentioned in relation to travel records.
Spending time vs Communicating
Witness clarifies distinction between spending physical time vs communicating. States she stopped spending time around age 24.
Invitation to meet Jeffrey Epstein
Ghislaine Maxwell called Kate to tell her Epstein was in town and urgently invited her to her townhouse to meet him, emphasizing it was a very important opportunity.
No Subject
Asked if she had fun; told Kate she was a 'good girl'.
Ongoing communication
The witness, Kate, describes her communications with Epstein during her twenties and early thirties as having a 'friendly' tone. She continued communicating because she did not want to admit what had happened to her and was fearful of disengaging.
Follow up
Maxwell called Kate after receiving the number.
Invitation
Invitation to go to tea at Maxwell's house.
Offering pictures
Kate sent emails to Jeffrey Epstein while he was in prison, offering to send him pictures. These are referred to as Exhibits K-8 and K-10.
Missed Flight
Witness told the government she missed her flight.
Unknown
Offering to send him pictures; signed 'Best love always, Kate.'
Case strength
Kate told him that the case against Ms. Maxwell was getting stronger because the women were strengthening their stories.
Trial Testimony
Testified that defendant told her Epstein obtained the NY townhouse for her.
N/A
Spoken to 'a couple of times'.
The case
The speaker states, 'you heard that Kate also gave an interview...'
Unknown
Kate confirms she heard from Maxwell again after the incident.
Contact Info
Phone number on a piece of paper
Post-massage debrief
Did you have fun? You're such a good girl. And I'm so happy you were able to come. This is really great. And he obviously likes you a lot.
St. Trinian's
Alleged conversation about St. Trinian's in connection with wearing a uniform (Witness testified she does not recall this).
Reporting abuse by Ghislaine Maxwell
Kate reached out to attorney Brad Edwards when her daughter was 1 or 2 to tell him the full extent of the manipulation and abuse instigated by Ghislaine Maxwell.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity