DOJ-OGR-00017195.jpg
644 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
4
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
644 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript of a rebuttal argument delivered by Ms. Comey on August 10, 2022. Comey refutes the defense's theory that witnesses (Kate, Carolyn, Annie, Jane) were manipulated by greedy lawyers to fabricate a story about Maxwell for financial gain from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. She argues there is no evidence for this conspiracy and highlights that one witness's lawyer worked pro bono, which contradicts the alleged financial motive.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Comey | Speaker (likely attorney) |
Delivering the rebuttal argument in a trial.
|
| Kate | Witness |
Mentioned as one of the witnesses in the case who gave an interview.
|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Mentioned as one of the witnesses in the case.
|
| Annie | Witness |
Mentioned as a witness who gave interviews and whose lawyer is working pro bono.
|
| Jane | Witness |
Mentioned as a witness who gave interviews.
|
| Maxwell | Subject of testimony |
The person about whom a story was allegedly fabricated by lawyers and witnesses.
|
| Epstein |
Mentioned in the name of the 'Epstein Victim Compensation Fund'.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| FBI | Government agency |
Mentioned as one of the groups the defense suggests implanted a story into witnesses' minds.
|
| Epstein Victim Compensation Fund | Fund |
Mentioned as the source of a potential financial motive for lawyers and witnesses.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the document.
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting agency, 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.'.
|
Relationships (4)
The document states that Annie has a lawyer who is working for her pro bono.
They are listed together as witnesses in the case: 'Kate and Carolyn and Annie.'
They are listed together as witnesses in the case: 'Kate and Carolyn and Annie.'
Key Quotes (2)
"There is not a shred of evidence that a group of lawyers got together, made up a story about Maxwell, and then implanted it into these witnesses' minds."Source
— Ms. Comey
(Arguing against the defense's conspiracy theory regarding the lawyers and witnesses.)
DOJ-OGR-00017195.jpg
Quote #1
"For one thing, Annie told you that her lawyer is pro bono, working for free. She doesn't get a cut of whatever Annie gets from the fund, so why would she need to make up a story"Source
— Ms. Comey
(Using the fact of a lawyer working pro bono to dismantle the defense's argument about financial motivation.)
DOJ-OGR-00017195.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,649 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 174 of 257
LCKCmax7
Rebuttal - Ms. Comey
LCKCmax7
Rebuttal - Ms. Comey
1 Kate and Carolyn and Annie. The defense seems to suggest that
2 this implantation happened from the media, greedy civil
3 lawyers, and the FBI. None of those actually make sense and
4 not one has support in this record.
5 Starting with the media, you heard absolutely nothing
6 at this trial about any of these witnesses consuming media in
7 this case. You heard that Jane and Annie gave some interviews
8 themselves, you heard that Kate also gave an interview, but
9 there is no evidence that any of these different witnesses saw
10 each other's interviews, they weren't asked about it, they
11 didn't say they did. There is no evidence that any witness saw
12 each other's media or anything else about this case in the
13 news. This is a distraction.
14 Turning to the lawyers. There is not a shred of
15 evidence that a group of lawyers got together, made up a story
16 about Maxwell, and then implanted it into these witnesses'
17 minds. Remember, each witness had a different lawyer. So for
18 this theory to work, four different attorneys had to come up
19 with this story and they separately manipulate their clients
20 into perjuring themselves at a federal trial all so they could
21 get a cut of the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. That makes
22 no sense for a bunch of different reasons.
23 For one thing, Annie told you that her lawyer is pro
24 bono, working for free. She doesn't get a cut of whatever
25 Annie gets from the fund, so why would she need to make up a
2 this implantation happened from the media, greedy civil
3 lawyers, and the FBI. None of those actually make sense and
4 not one has support in this record.
5 Starting with the media, you heard absolutely nothing
6 at this trial about any of these witnesses consuming media in
7 this case. You heard that Jane and Annie gave some interviews
8 themselves, you heard that Kate also gave an interview, but
9 there is no evidence that any of these different witnesses saw
10 each other's interviews, they weren't asked about it, they
11 didn't say they did. There is no evidence that any witness saw
12 each other's media or anything else about this case in the
13 news. This is a distraction.
14 Turning to the lawyers. There is not a shred of
15 evidence that a group of lawyers got together, made up a story
16 about Maxwell, and then implanted it into these witnesses'
17 minds. Remember, each witness had a different lawyer. So for
18 this theory to work, four different attorneys had to come up
19 with this story and they separately manipulate their clients
20 into perjuring themselves at a federal trial all so they could
21 get a cut of the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. That makes
22 no sense for a bunch of different reasons.
23 For one thing, Annie told you that her lawyer is pro
24 bono, working for free. She doesn't get a cut of whatever
25 Annie gets from the fund, so why would she need to make up a
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017195
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document