Juror 50
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Judicial inquiry |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Stepbrother of Juror 50
|
Family |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Judicial inquiry subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
United States Government
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Stepbrother of Juror 50
|
Victim abuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Judicial authority |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
district court
|
Judge juror inquiry |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
district court
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Judicial oversight |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Knowledge of |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Knowledge of |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Counsel for Juror 50
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Juror judicial authority |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Trial participant |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lucia Osborn-Crowley
|
Interviewee interviewer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Dr. Elizabeth Loftus
|
Contradictory views |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Judicial authority witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
United States Attorney’s Office (SDNY)
|
No association |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
No association |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Knowledge subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell)
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Defendant juror |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Trial participant |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Juror accused |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Jury selection/voir dire | Juror 50 made multiple false statements on a questionnaire and to the Court regarding his imparti... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Jury service | The overall duty of the juror, which is described as lasting from the point of instruction until ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Jury selection | The process of selecting jurors for the trial, which the respondent is currently undergoing. | courtroom | View |
| N/A | Trial | The legal proceeding for which the juror is being selected. The juror is instructed not to discus... | courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A hearing to question Juror 50 about potential dishonesty during voir dire and potential bias. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The jury selection process, referred to as 'voir dire', during which Juror 50 was asked questions... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Jury deliberations, about which Juror 50 cannot be questioned regarding what was said or his ment... | jury room | View |
| N/A | Court proceeding | The voir dire (jury selection) process during which Juror 50 allegedly answered a question falsely. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Trial | The trial of United States v. Maxwell, during which Juror 50 served on the jury. | Court | View |
| N/A | Press interviews | Post-verdict press interviews given by Juror 50, during which he did not reveal his last name. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Hearing | A future public hearing is planned to inquire into whether Juror 50's answers were false. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | The criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, referenced as 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell'. | United States Courthouse | View |
| N/A | Hearing | A court hearing where Juror 50 testified about his answers on the jury questionnaire. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Interview | Juror 50 was interviewed by the Daily Mail, during which he realized he may have made a mistake o... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A Rule 33 motion based on a juror’s alleged erroneous response during voir dire, governed by McDo... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | The original trial in which Juror 50 served. The events described in the document occurred shortl... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal motion | Juror 50's counsel requested a copy of Juror 50's questionnaire and the transcript of his testimo... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A post-verdict hearing where Juror 50 gave explanations and disclosed facts about his sexual abuse. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Voir Dire (jury selection) where it is argued Juror 50 should have disclosed his traumatic experi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Crime | Child sexual abuse of Juror 50, which occurred when he was a minor, on multiple occasions over se... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Hearing | A hearing where Juror 50 gave sworn testimony about his ability to be an impartial juror. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | An inquiry into the conduct of Juror 50 during the voir dire process of the trial of Ghislaine Ma... | United States District Court | View |
| N/A | Trial | A close, contested trial involving Ms. Maxwell where the key issue was the credibility of the acc... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Jury deliberation | Jury deliberations during which one juror allegedly made statements that were later reported by J... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | The central legal proceeding where the defendant's involvement in abuse was at issue. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009544.jpg
This document is Page 3 of a court filing (Document 620) from February 25, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). It details the discovery that 'Juror 50' gave media interviews admitting to being a sexual abuse victim despite denying it on his juror questionnaire, leading the Defendant to file a motion for a new trial. The document also chronicles communications between Juror 50 and the SDNY Jury Department/District Executive in January 2022, where the juror sought legal guidance and access to his questionnaire.
DOJ-OGR-00009542.jpg
This document is an Opinion & Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan denies the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record, which alleged misconduct by 'Juror 50'. However, the Court agrees to a limited evidentiary hearing to determine if Juror 50 provided a materially false answer on a jury questionnaire.
DOJ-OGR-00009539.jpg
This is the final signature page (page 3) of a court filing (Document 617) from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on February 24, 2022. The US Attorney's office argues that because Juror 50 has already spoken publicly, no redactions are justified for a specific motion, which should be docketed. The document is signed by US Attorney Damian Williams and AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach.
DOJ-OGR-00009538.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing (Document 617) in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 24, 2022. The text argues against the defendant's claim that 'Juror 50's' motion to intervene constitutes a discovery request, clarifying that the juror is seeking access to his own questionnaire which he swore under penalty of perjury. The filing argues that the motion is a judicial document that should not remain sealed, noting the defendant's arguments regarding privacy and potential prejudice lack merit.
DOJ-OGR-00009537.jpg
This document is a letter dated January 13, 2022, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The Government argues that a motion filed by Counsel for Juror 50 to intervene and obtain jury selection materials should be filed publicly without redactions, countering the defendant's objection that it is not a judicial document. The document references a previous court order from January 12, 2022, and cites legal precedent regarding public access to judicial documents.
DOJ-OGR-00008829.jpg
This legal letter, dated January 25, 2022, from Nathan Siegel of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, on behalf of ABC News and NBCUniversal News Group, is addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York. It requests to join other news organizations in opposing the sealing of the Defendant's motion for a new trial and supporting exhibits, and specifically asks for Juror 50's motion to be unsealed, citing its relevance as a "judicial document" to the judicial process.
DOJ-OGR-00008815.jpg
This is a court order from United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated January 12, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The order states that if a future submission from 'Juror 50' is allowed, the Court will grant the juror's legal counsel access to the ECF (Electronic Case Files) docketing system.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Unknown Entities | Juror 50 | $0.00 | Hypothetical 'receipt of financial payment for ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Media outlets (im... | Juror 50 | $0.00 | Hypothetical compensation for post-trial interv... | View |
Juror experience / Sexual abuse history
Juror 50 disclosed his sexual abuse history and realized he may have misanswered questionnaire Question 48.
Jury Service
Statements made by Juror 50 to the media about his jury service.
Juror Screening
Document Juror 50 is seeking a copy of.
Jury Deliberations
Discussed why the jury did not convict on count two (regarding Jane) but convicted on others.
Explanation of questionnaire answers
Testimony regarding why he answered 'No' to questions about family abuse.
Deliberations
Statements regarding personal experiences and deliberations.
Verdict
Proclaimed the guilty verdict was 'for all the victims'.
Jury Questionnaire
Documents containing answers regarding prior experience with sexual assault.
Production of communications
Compelling production of Juror 50's communications and other information.
Jury Selection Questions (25, 48, 49)
Questions regarding history of crime victimization and sexual harassment/abuse accusations.
Interview
Unreleased interview mentioned in a trailer.
Juror experience/questionnaire
Juror 50 appeared surprised that the questionnaire asked about sexual abuse history.
Experience as a juror
Described identifying with witnesses and convincing other jurors based on personal trauma.
Unknown
Juror felt compelled to contact a witness.
Jury Selection
Omissions regarding personal history of abuse.
Juror Bias / Sexual Abuse History
Juror 50 testified that his history of sexual abuse would not affect his impartiality.
Gratitude for conviction
Social media posts expressing appreciation for statements of gratitude received for telling his personal story of abuse and convicting Ms. Maxwell.
Unknown
Thanked her for sharing her story.
Sexual Abuse History
Juror 50 revealed his sexual abuse history publicly.
Juror Questionnaire
Responses regarding impartiality, burden of proof, and media consumption (CNN).
Unsworn statements
Statements made by Juror 50 to media outlets post-trial.
Juror misconduct inquiry
Statements about a second juror.
Juror Questionnaire
Referenced as 'Juror 50's Questionnaire'
Post-verdict statements
Referenced as 'Juror 50's Public Statements Following the Verdict'
Jury Questionnaire (Question 48 and 25)
Questions regarding history of sexual abuse or being a victim of crime.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity