The Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell)
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co owners of property |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MDC
|
Inmate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-4
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Victim perpetrator alleged |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Melissa
|
Victim perpetrator alleged |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Eva Dubin
|
Witness for defense |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The Court's consideration of the Defendant's renewed motion for bail, focusing on her internation... | United States | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Defendant's renewed motion for bail is being considered by the Court. | United States | View |
| N/A | Legal argument | The Government argues against the defendant's bail motion, citing her flight risk due to internat... | United States | View |
| 2020-12-30 | Legal proceeding | The Court's consideration of the Defendant's renewed motion for bail, focusing on her internation... | United States | View |
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | Deposition of the Defendant | Unspecified | View |
DOJ-OGR-00018112.jpg
This document is page 11 of a court transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Comey argues for the admission of a photograph (Exhibit 250) found in the 'lake room' of Epstein's home, which depicts Epstein with a young girl across his lap, appearing to pull down her underwear. The prosecution argues this is probative because it was prominently displayed in the house that Maxwell 'ran' as the 'lady of the house,' while Defense attorney Mr. Everdell objects, calling it prejudicial and an attempt to backdoor evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00014758.jpg
This page is a transcript from the sentencing phase of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated August 22, 2022. The judge rules on defense objections regarding the Presentence Investigation Report (PSR) concerning three specific individuals: Jane, Kate, and Annie. The court affirms that testimony showed Maxwell facilitated sexual acts for Jane and recruited Kate for massages, but agrees to amend the record to state Kate was above the age of consent.
DOJ-OGR-00008278.jpg
This is page 6 of a legal filing (Document 533) from the US v. Maxwell case, filed on December 9, 2021. The text argues for the authenticity of Government Exhibit 52 (a contact book seized from Alfredo Rodriguez), citing Juan Alessi's testimony and the defendant's own admission in a 2016 deposition that she recognized the 'actual document,' despite claiming it was stolen. The document asserts the book belonged to both Epstein and the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00001169.jpg
This court document outlines the Government's argument regarding the defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) bail application, focusing on her financial assets and lack of candor. It alleges she transferred the majority of her wealth (over $20 million brought to the marriage versus her husband's $200k) into trusts for her spouse to hide assets, including funds used to buy her New Hampshire hideout. The text highlights discrepancies between her actual wealth and what she disclosed to Pretrial Services.
DOJ-OGR-00001165.jpg
This page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) argues against granting bail to the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell). The prosecution details her sophisticated efforts to evade detection in the year prior to her arrest, including purchasing a home through a trust, using aliases with real estate agents, and holding assets/credit cards under false names. The document asserts these actions prove she is a flight risk capable of assuming a new identity.
DOJ-OGR-00001164.jpg
This is page 19 (Document 100-2) from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The US Government argues that the defendant poses a significant flight risk because waivers of extradition are legally unenforceable in France and the UK. The prosecution cites advice from the OIA and legal precedents to demonstrate that extradition is uncertain and lengthy, justifying continued detention pending trial.
DOJ-OGR-00021010.jpg
This document is a legal filing (likely an appellate brief response) from April 2022 summarizing testimony from a victim identified as 'Jane' regarding the criminal conduct of Ghislaine Maxwell ('the Defendant') and Jeffrey Epstein. It details how Jane met the pair at a summer camp, was groomed, and transported via private and commercial flights to properties in Florida, New York, and New Mexico for sexual activity starting when she was 14. The text highlights Maxwell's role in arranging travel and participating in the scheme to transport underage girls across state lines for illegal sexual acts.
DOJ-OGR-00020981.jpg
This document is a court ruling from April 1, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The Court rejects the Defendant's argument that 'Juror 50' was biased for failing to follow instructions during the jury questionnaire phase. The Court accepts Juror 50's testimony that while he was distracted (thinking about his ex) during the questionnaire, he was fully attentive and compliant during voir dire and the actual trial.
DOJ-OGR-00010560.jpg
This document is a page from a Government sentencing filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) arguing for a 'Four-Point Leadership Enhancement' under sentencing guidelines. It asserts that the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) was a leader of an 'otherwise extensive' criminal conspiracy involving Jeffrey Epstein, spanning the UK, Virgin Islands, and three states. The text cites testimony from victims (Carolyn, Virginia) and staff (Juan Alessi, pilots) to demonstrate the scale of the operation and the defendant's role in recruiting victims and managing Epstein's properties.
DOJ-OGR-00010551.jpg
This document is a page from a government sentencing filing (likely the Government's sentencing memorandum) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It details specific instances of sexual abuse involving a victim named Carolyn and a minor named Melissa (recruited by Carolyn at age 16) at Epstein's Palm Beach residence, describing a 'pyramid scheme' of recruitment starting with Virginia Giuffre. The text notes that the US Probation Office recommended a 20-year sentence, characterizing Maxwell's conduct as 'heinous and predatory.'
DOJ-OGR-00010545.jpg
This document is page 10 of a legal filing (Document 670, Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated June 22, 2022, detailing the grooming and sexual abuse tactics used by the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) and Jeffrey Epstein. It describes how they monetarily incentivized girls to recruit others and specifically outlines the abuse of a victim named 'Jane,' whom they met at a summer camp in 1994 when she was 14. The text highlights the defendant's role in normalizing abuse, personally fondling victims, and using her social status to provide cover for Epstein's predation.
DOJ-OGR-00013835.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed August 10, 2022) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text details arguments regarding the 'enticement statute,' utilizing testimony from a victim identified as 'Jane' and an expert, Dr. Rocchio, to establish that the defendant exercised 'coercive control' and personally engaged in sexual abuse. It further argues an 'aiding and abetting' theory, stating the defendant knowingly facilitated Jeffrey Epstein's abuse of Jane by being present on the plane and in the room in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00010348.jpg
This document is a page from a court order (Case 1:20-cr-00330, US v. Maxwell) filed on April 1, 2022. The Court rejects the Defendant's argument that 'Juror 50' was biased based on post-trial statements claiming the verdict was for the victims. The text discusses implied bias related to the juror's personal history of sexual abuse and references legal precedents regarding post-trial juror statements.
DOJ-OGR-00004778.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court filing from June 16, 2021, regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It details the conditions of the defendant's confinement at the MDC, specifically highlighting her access to attorney communications (25 hours of VTC per week and weekend in-person visits) and the security measures in place, including soundless camera monitoring and mandatory searches (pat-downs, mouth checks, and strip searches).
DOJ-OGR-00011705.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The prosecutor outlines upcoming evidence, including flight logs showing Maxwell and Epstein traveling with minors, FedEx records of gifts sent to a 15-year-old victim, and records placing Maxwell and Epstein at an arts camp with a 14-year-old victim named Jane. The statement asserts that this evidence proves the defendant conspired with Epstein to traffic and sexually abuse children.
DOJ-OGR-00011555.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the sentencing hearing of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on July 22, 2022. The Judge is issuing a ruling regarding objections to the Pre-Sentence Report (PSR), specifically noting the defense's argument to use 2003 sentencing guidelines versus 2004 guidelines. The text explicitly mentions that the government's sole objection to the guideline calculation is that Virginia Roberts and Melissa should be formally considered victims.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Epstein | The Defendant (Gh... | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest included in defendant's assets for dete... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | The Defendant (Gh... | $23,000,000.00 | Total transfers demonstrated by evidence at tri... | View |
| 2001-01-01 | Paid | The Defendant (Gh... | Minor Victim-4 | $0.00 | Payment following sexual encounters with Epstein. | View |
Response to the Court's order regarding the CVRA
The Defendant's letter references a motion by Kate's attorney.
Response to victims' letter
The Defendant submitted a letter in response to the letter from the attorney for two individuals.
Response to victims' letter
The Defendant submitted a letter in response to the letter from the attorney for two individuals.
Delivery of legal mail at the Metropolitan Detention Center
The defendant submitted a letter (Dkt. No. 346) to the court concerning the delivery of her legal mail at the MDC.
Authenticity of contact book
Defendant confronted with a scan of the contact book; admitted familiarity with the 'actual document' but claimed it was stolen.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity