Mr. Flatley

Person
Mentions
78
Relationships
22
Events
38
Documents
38

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
22 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person MS. POMERANTZ
Professional
10 Very Strong
10
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Legal representative
9 Strong
5
View
organization Defense
Professional subject of information
6
1
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Professional
6
1
View
organization The Court
Professional
6
2
View
person Unnamed Questioner
Professional
6
2
View
organization GOVERNMENT
Professional witness
6
1
View
organization The government
Retainer expert witness
5
1
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Legal representative
5
1
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Examiner witness
5
1
View
organization The government
Witness
5
1
View
person Government Exhibit 54
Examiner evidence
5
1
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Professional
5
1
View
person Unidentified speaker (attorney)
Legal representative
5
1
View
organization The government
Witness for prosecution
5
1
View
organization GOVERNMENT
Witness
5
1
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Opposing counsel
1
1
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Opposing counsel witness
1
1
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Examination
1
1
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Examination
1
1
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Proponent of witness
1
1
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Prosecutor witness
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Admission of Government Exhibit 424 into evidence during the testimony of Mr. Flatley. Courtroom View
N/A Forensic imaging A hard drive (Government Exhibit 54) was copied using a TX1 disc duplicator, verified with a hash... AccessData's lab View
N/A Testimony Mr. Flatley testified about data extraction from a single hard drive. Courtroom View
N/A Legal disclosure A disclosure was made on November 26, which the speaker believes contains potential expert opinio... N/A View
N/A Testimony Mr. Flatley's testimony regarding the retrieval of metadata from devices seized from Epstein's home. this district View
N/A Testimony Mr. Flatley provided testimony. N/A View
N/A Disclosure Government's disclosure of Mr. Flatley as a witness and potential disclosure of Mr. Kelso as a re... N/A View
N/A Testimony The anticipated testimony of Mr. Flatley regarding file dates on CDs. Court View
N/A N/A Mr. Flatley examined digital evidence regarding this case. Unspecified View
N/A N/A Forensic imaging of Government Exhibit 54 using a TX1 disc duplicator. Forensics Lab View
N/A Evidence examination Mr. Flatley received Government Exhibit 54 (a hard drive), identified by his initials, case numbe... N/A View
2022-08-10 Court testimony Direct examination of Mr. Flatley regarding the forensic imaging of Government Exhibit 54. Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 Court hearing A court proceeding where witness Mr. Flatley is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz regarding the authent... Court View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A witness, Mr. Flatley, was excused following his recross-examination. Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding Testimony of Mr. Flatley during a court case, where he is being questioned by Ms. Pomerantz about... Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 N/A Court testimony in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell or related proceedings ... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court testimony of Mr. Flatley regarding forensic data preservation. Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Witness Excusal Courtroom (Case 1:20-cr-003... View
2022-08-10 N/A Court testimony regarding the authentication and content of documents found in the investigation. Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Direct examination of Mr. Flatley regarding forensic evidence. Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
2022-08-10 N/A Court hearing involving the direct examination of witness Mr. Flatley regarding the authenticatio... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court testimony of Mr. Flatley in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Southern District of New Yo... View
2022-08-10 N/A Direct examination testimony of Mr. Flatley in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
2022-08-10 N/A Direct examination of witness Flatley regarding Exhibit 418B (metadata/properties of 418). Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court testimony (Redirect and Recross) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Maxwell). Courtroom (Southern Distric... View

DOJ-OGR-00013071.jpg

This document is page 58 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. Witness Mr. Flatley is being questioned by Ms. Pomerantz regarding an email sent by 'gmax' (gmax1@mindspring.com) to 'MarkhamCPM@earthlink.net'. The email discusses the creation of a 'household manual,' specifically detailing where to buy cleaning supplies (Publix and Sam's Club in Palm Beach Gardens) and specific brands of laundry products to use.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00013070.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a legal case filed on August 10, 2022. In it, an attorney named Ms. Pomerantz questions a witness, Mr. Flatley, about an email from May 25, 2001. The email, sent by "Sally" to "Ms. Maxwell," inquires about the status of a "PB manual" and mentions a specific conversation with someone named "John".

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00013069.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley. He is asked to read from an email dated May 25, 2001, sent from 'gmaxl@mindspring.com' to Sally Markham. The email contains a detailed list of complaints about the poor work performance of an individual named John, expressing the dissatisfaction of another individual referred to as 'JE'.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00013068.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley, by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. The primary action is the successful authentication and admission of an email, labeled Government Exhibit 424, into evidence. The court admits the exhibit without objection from the opposing counsel, Ms. Menninger.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00013067.jpg

This document is a court transcript page from a case filed on August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley. The questioning focuses on Government Exhibit 54, through which it is established that Microsoft Windows 2000 was installed on February 22, 2001, and that the registered organization and owner for this installation was listed as 'Gmax'.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00013065.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of Mr. Flatley. He explains the forensic process of copying a fragile, old hard drive (Government Exhibit 54) using a TX1 disc duplicator to preserve the original. Mr. Flatley confirms the copy's accuracy using a hash algorithm before analyzing the data with AccessData's software.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00013063.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing counsel Ms. Pomerantz questioning a witness, Mr. Flatley. Mr. Flatley identifies Government Exhibit 54 as a hard drive he examined, explaining his evidence identification method which includes a unique 'NYC number' (NYC024350), his initials, the case number, and the date.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00013027.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument between prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach and defense attorney Ms. Menninger regarding the upcoming testimony of a witness named Mr. Flatley. The dispute centers on whether Flatley's testimony regarding file dates on CDs constitutes expert opinion or purely factual testimony based on '3500 material'.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00013026.jpg

This page contains a transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. A defense attorney is arguing before the judge to limit the testimony of a witness named Mr. Flatley. The argument focuses on distinguishing between factual testimony regarding metadata (which the defense accepts) and expert opinion, as well as precluding testimony regarding CDs (Compact Discs) because Flatley was only disclosed to review 'devices.'

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00011647.jpg

This document is page 26 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It details a legal argument between prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach and the Judge regarding Rule 16 disclosures and the sufficiency of notice provided to the defense concerning the opinions of expert witness Mr. Flatley. The Judge warns the government that if their notice is insufficient, they may face issues later, emphasizing equal standards for both parties.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00011645.jpg

A page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between the prosecution (Mr. Rohrbach), the defense (Ms. Menninger), and the Judge regarding expert witness Mr. Flatley. The discussion focuses on the scope of Mr. Flatley's expertise, specifically regarding forensic principles, digital document storage, and metadata, and whether proper notice was given to the defense regarding his opinions. The Judge instructs that any differing expert opinions on these technical matters must be noticed.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00011644.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated August 10, 2022) involving a legal debate over witness testimony. Ms. Menninger argues that the government did not provide sufficient notice regarding the scope of Mr. Flatley's testimony concerning the extraction of user data and metadata, claiming the '3500 material' was insufficient. Mr. Rohrbach responds that while they view Flatley primarily as a fact witness, they provided expert notice due to the blurred lines between fact and expert testimony in this technical context.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00011642.jpg

This document is a partial court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, discussing the anticipated testimony of Mr. Flatley. His testimony concerns the retrieval of metadata from devices seized from Epstein's home, and the possibility of Mr. Kelso serving as a rebuttal witness. The government and defense are preparing for this testimony and related disclosures, with Mr. Flatley having given similar testimony in other cases.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
2
Total
2

Direct Examination

From: MS. POMERANTZ
To: Mr. Flatley

Questioning regarding metadata dates and titles of Government Exhibits 420, 418R, and 418B.

Meeting
2022-08-10

Information contained in Government Exhibits 419 and 54

From: Unnamed Questioner
To: Mr. Flatley

An unnamed questioner conducts a direct examination of Mr. Flatley, asking him to identify details from Government Exhibit 54. Mr. Flatley confirms the software install date was February 22, 2001, the product was Microsoft Windows 2000, and the registered organization and owner was 'Gmax'.

Court testimony
2022-08-10

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity