| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
organization
Defense
|
Professional subject of information |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Professional witness |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Retainer expert witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Examiner witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Government Exhibit 54
|
Examiner evidence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unidentified speaker (attorney)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Witness for prosecution |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Opposing counsel witness |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Examination |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Examination |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Proponent of witness |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Prosecutor witness |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibit 424 into evidence during the testimony of Mr. Flatley. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Forensic imaging | A hard drive (Government Exhibit 54) was copied using a TX1 disc duplicator, verified with a hash... | AccessData's lab | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Mr. Flatley testified about data extraction from a single hard drive. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal disclosure | A disclosure was made on November 26, which the speaker believes contains potential expert opinio... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Mr. Flatley's testimony regarding the retrieval of metadata from devices seized from Epstein's home. | this district | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Mr. Flatley provided testimony. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Disclosure | Government's disclosure of Mr. Flatley as a witness and potential disclosure of Mr. Kelso as a re... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Testimony | The anticipated testimony of Mr. Flatley regarding file dates on CDs. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Flatley examined digital evidence regarding this case. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Forensic imaging of Government Exhibit 54 using a TX1 disc duplicator. | Forensics Lab | View |
| N/A | Evidence examination | Mr. Flatley received Government Exhibit 54 (a hard drive), identified by his initials, case numbe... | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Direct examination of Mr. Flatley regarding the forensic imaging of Government Exhibit 54. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | A court proceeding where witness Mr. Flatley is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz regarding the authent... | Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A witness, Mr. Flatley, was excused following his recross-examination. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Testimony of Mr. Flatley during a court case, where he is being questioned by Ms. Pomerantz about... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court testimony in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell or related proceedings ... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court testimony of Mr. Flatley regarding forensic data preservation. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Witness Excusal | Courtroom (Case 1:20-cr-003... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court testimony regarding the authentication and content of documents found in the investigation. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Direct examination of Mr. Flatley regarding forensic evidence. | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court hearing involving the direct examination of witness Mr. Flatley regarding the authenticatio... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court testimony of Mr. Flatley in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Direct examination testimony of Mr. Flatley in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Direct examination of witness Flatley regarding Exhibit 418B (metadata/properties of 418). | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court testimony (Redirect and Recross) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Maxwell). | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
This document is page 58 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. Witness Mr. Flatley is being questioned by Ms. Pomerantz regarding an email sent by 'gmax' (gmax1@mindspring.com) to 'MarkhamCPM@earthlink.net'. The email discusses the creation of a 'household manual,' specifically detailing where to buy cleaning supplies (Publix and Sam's Club in Palm Beach Gardens) and specific brands of laundry products to use.
This document is a court transcript from a legal case filed on August 10, 2022. In it, an attorney named Ms. Pomerantz questions a witness, Mr. Flatley, about an email from May 25, 2001. The email, sent by "Sally" to "Ms. Maxwell," inquires about the status of a "PB manual" and mentions a specific conversation with someone named "John".
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley. He is asked to read from an email dated May 25, 2001, sent from 'gmaxl@mindspring.com' to Sally Markham. The email contains a detailed list of complaints about the poor work performance of an individual named John, expressing the dissatisfaction of another individual referred to as 'JE'.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley, by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. The primary action is the successful authentication and admission of an email, labeled Government Exhibit 424, into evidence. The court admits the exhibit without objection from the opposing counsel, Ms. Menninger.
This document is a court transcript page from a case filed on August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley. The questioning focuses on Government Exhibit 54, through which it is established that Microsoft Windows 2000 was installed on February 22, 2001, and that the registered organization and owner for this installation was listed as 'Gmax'.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of Mr. Flatley. He explains the forensic process of copying a fragile, old hard drive (Government Exhibit 54) using a TX1 disc duplicator to preserve the original. Mr. Flatley confirms the copy's accuracy using a hash algorithm before analyzing the data with AccessData's software.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing counsel Ms. Pomerantz questioning a witness, Mr. Flatley. Mr. Flatley identifies Government Exhibit 54 as a hard drive he examined, explaining his evidence identification method which includes a unique 'NYC number' (NYC024350), his initials, the case number, and the date.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument between prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach and defense attorney Ms. Menninger regarding the upcoming testimony of a witness named Mr. Flatley. The dispute centers on whether Flatley's testimony regarding file dates on CDs constitutes expert opinion or purely factual testimony based on '3500 material'.
This page contains a transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. A defense attorney is arguing before the judge to limit the testimony of a witness named Mr. Flatley. The argument focuses on distinguishing between factual testimony regarding metadata (which the defense accepts) and expert opinion, as well as precluding testimony regarding CDs (Compact Discs) because Flatley was only disclosed to review 'devices.'
This document is page 26 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It details a legal argument between prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach and the Judge regarding Rule 16 disclosures and the sufficiency of notice provided to the defense concerning the opinions of expert witness Mr. Flatley. The Judge warns the government that if their notice is insufficient, they may face issues later, emphasizing equal standards for both parties.
A page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between the prosecution (Mr. Rohrbach), the defense (Ms. Menninger), and the Judge regarding expert witness Mr. Flatley. The discussion focuses on the scope of Mr. Flatley's expertise, specifically regarding forensic principles, digital document storage, and metadata, and whether proper notice was given to the defense regarding his opinions. The Judge instructs that any differing expert opinions on these technical matters must be noticed.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated August 10, 2022) involving a legal debate over witness testimony. Ms. Menninger argues that the government did not provide sufficient notice regarding the scope of Mr. Flatley's testimony concerning the extraction of user data and metadata, claiming the '3500 material' was insufficient. Mr. Rohrbach responds that while they view Flatley primarily as a fact witness, they provided expert notice due to the blurred lines between fact and expert testimony in this technical context.
This document is a partial court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, discussing the anticipated testimony of Mr. Flatley. His testimony concerns the retrieval of metadata from devices seized from Epstein's home, and the possibility of Mr. Kelso serving as a rebuttal witness. The government and defense are preparing for this testimony and related disclosures, with Mr. Flatley having given similar testimony in other cases.
Questioning regarding metadata dates and titles of Government Exhibits 420, 418R, and 418B.
An unnamed questioner conducts a direct examination of Mr. Flatley, asking him to identify details from Government Exhibit 54. Mr. Flatley confirms the software install date was February 22, 2001, the product was Microsoft Windows 2000, and the registered organization and owner was 'Gmax'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity