Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Mr. Flatley

Person
Mentions
78
Relationships
22
Events
38
Documents
38
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
22 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person MS. POMERANTZ
Professional
10 Very Strong
10
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Legal representative
9 Strong
5
View
organization Defense
Professional subject of information
6
1
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Professional
6
1
View
organization The Court
Professional
6
2
View
person Unnamed Questioner
Professional
6
2
View
organization GOVERNMENT
Professional witness
6
1
View
organization The government
Retainer expert witness
5
1
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Legal representative
5
1
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Examiner witness
5
1
View
organization The government
Witness
5
1
View
person Government Exhibit 54
Examiner evidence
5
1
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Professional
5
1
View
person Unidentified speaker (attorney)
Legal representative
5
1
View
organization The government
Witness for prosecution
5
1
View
organization GOVERNMENT
Witness
5
1
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Opposing counsel
1
1
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Opposing counsel witness
1
1
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Examination
1
1
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Examination
1
1
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Proponent of witness
1
1
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Prosecutor witness
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Admission of Government Exhibit 424 into evidence during the testimony of Mr. Flatley. Courtroom View
N/A Forensic imaging A hard drive (Government Exhibit 54) was copied using a TX1 disc duplicator, verified with a hash... AccessData's lab View
N/A Testimony Mr. Flatley testified about data extraction from a single hard drive. Courtroom View
N/A Legal disclosure A disclosure was made on November 26, which the speaker believes contains potential expert opinio... N/A View
N/A Testimony Mr. Flatley's testimony regarding the retrieval of metadata from devices seized from Epstein's home. this district View
N/A Testimony Mr. Flatley provided testimony. N/A View
N/A Disclosure Government's disclosure of Mr. Flatley as a witness and potential disclosure of Mr. Kelso as a re... N/A View
N/A Testimony The anticipated testimony of Mr. Flatley regarding file dates on CDs. Court View
N/A N/A Mr. Flatley examined digital evidence regarding this case. Unspecified View
N/A N/A Forensic imaging of Government Exhibit 54 using a TX1 disc duplicator. Forensics Lab View
N/A Evidence examination Mr. Flatley received Government Exhibit 54 (a hard drive), identified by his initials, case numbe... N/A View
2022-08-10 Court testimony Direct examination of Mr. Flatley regarding the forensic imaging of Government Exhibit 54. Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 Court hearing A court proceeding where witness Mr. Flatley is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz regarding the authent... Court View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A witness, Mr. Flatley, was excused following his recross-examination. Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding Testimony of Mr. Flatley during a court case, where he is being questioned by Ms. Pomerantz about... Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 N/A Court testimony in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell or related proceedings ... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court testimony of Mr. Flatley regarding forensic data preservation. Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Witness Excusal Courtroom (Case 1:20-cr-003... View
2022-08-10 N/A Court testimony regarding the authentication and content of documents found in the investigation. Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Direct examination of Mr. Flatley regarding forensic evidence. Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
2022-08-10 N/A Court hearing involving the direct examination of witness Mr. Flatley regarding the authenticatio... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court testimony of Mr. Flatley in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Southern District of New Yo... View
2022-08-10 N/A Direct examination testimony of Mr. Flatley in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
2022-08-10 N/A Direct examination of witness Flatley regarding Exhibit 418B (metadata/properties of 418). Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court testimony (Redirect and Recross) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Maxwell). Courtroom (Southern Distric... View

DOJ-OGR-00008336.jpg

This document is page 26 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on December 10, 2021. It records a procedural argument between prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach and the Court regarding the sufficiency of the government's disclosures (Rule 16 and 3500 materials) concerning their expert witness, Mr. Flatley. The Judge warns the government that if their notice is insufficient regarding the expert's opinions, they may face issues later in the trial.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008334.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated December 10, 2021, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It details a legal argument between the prosecution (Mr. Rohrbach) and defense (Ms. Menninger) regarding the scope of expert testimony provided by a Mr. Flatley concerning digital forensics and metadata. The judge instructs the parties on how to handle differing expert opinions on forensic principles.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008333.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on December 10, 2021. Attorneys Ms. Menninger and Mr. Rohrbach are arguing before the court about the nature of a witness, Mr. Flatley. The central issue is whether Mr. Flatley will testify as a fact witness or an expert witness regarding his methods for user data extraction, and whether sufficient notice was provided to the opposing side.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008331.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 12/10/21) detailing a legal argument regarding expert witnesses. The defense discusses the potential testimony of Mr. Kelso, noting it depends on the testimony of government witness Mr. Flatley, who will speak about metadata retrieved from devices seized at Epstein's home. Prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach responds that the government has provided ample notice and '3500 information' regarding Flatley's expected testimony.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018679.jpg

This is a transcript page from the trial USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz questions witness Mr. Flatley confirming that all emails in 'Government Exhibit 54' came from the account 'gmax1@mindspring.com'. Subsequently, Defense attorney Ms. Menninger begins recross-examination, asking technical questions about how email clients (like Outlook) automatically refresh data from servers when connected to the internet.

Court transcript (redirect and recross examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018668.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (filed 08/10/22) featuring the testimony of a Mr. Flatley. Ms. Pomerantz concludes her questioning after Flatley reads a statement describing Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell as 'great partners' and 'best of friends' who complement each other well. Ms. Menninger then begins cross-examination, establishing that a hard drive (Exhibit GX54) was found in Mr. Epstein's New York home.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018664.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz regarding the metadata (creation, save, and print dates in September 2002) and titles of specific evidence documents. The documents discussed are titled 'PB New Shampoo and Massage Products' (Exhibit 420) and 'Palm Beach House Workers' (Exhibit 418R), linking the evidence to operations at a Palm Beach residence.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018656.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz. Flatley reads into the record excerpts from an email sent by 'gmax' (gmax1@mindspring.com) to 'MarkhamCPM@earthlink.net'. The email content discusses the creation of a household manual, specific cleaning supply preferences (Tide, Downy, Bounce), purchasing locations (Publix, Sam's Club-PB Gardens), and coordination with an individual named John regarding checkoff lists.

Court transcript (testimony)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018655.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley. The testimony focuses on an email exchange from May 25, 2001, sent by 'Sally' to 'Ms. Maxwell' regarding a 'PB manual' (likely Palm Beach manual) and a conversation with 'John'.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018654.jpg

This document is a court transcript page from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Witness Mr. Flatley reads an email dated May 25, 2001, from 'gmax1@mindspring.com' to Sally Markham. The email details specific failures by a staff member named John, including issues with a Mercedes ('black Merc'), a dirty pool deck, technical issues with a computer, and disorganized massage creams in Jeffrey Epstein's ('JE') bathroom.

Court transcript (testimony)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018653.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz, focusing on the authentication and admission of Government Exhibit 424, which is described as an email. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, offers no objection, and the Judge admits the exhibit into evidence.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018650.jpg

This document is page 52 of a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley. Flatley describes the forensic process of preserving data from an old, fragile hard drive (Government Exhibit 54) using a TX1 disc duplicator and verifying the copy via hash algorithms before processing it with AccessData software. The testimony emphasizes the necessity of copying the drive to prevent data loss due to hardware failure.

Court transcript / testimony
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018648.jpg

This document is page 50 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz regarding forensic evidence. Flatley identifies Government Exhibit 54 as a hard drive he examined, noting its unique identifier 'NYC024350', and begins describing the forensic process involving a write blocker.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018647.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz. Flatley provides technical definitions for digital evidence, computers, and hard drives, and confirms that he examined digital evidence relevant to the case, noting that forensic examiners usually know nothing about the case details while analyzing data.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018614.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between the judge and counsel for the government (Mr. Rohrbach) and an opposing party (Ms. Menninger). Mr. Rohrbach confirms that the government will not question a witness, Mr. Flatley, about 'CDs' during direct examination, which resolves a procedural issue and satisfies the court and Ms. Menninger. The judge remarks that prior preparation for this line of questioning is now moot but may be saved for future use.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018612.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a discussion between attorneys Mr. Rohrbach and Ms. Menninger before a judge. The primary issue is the scope of testimony for an upcoming witness, Mr. Flatley, concerning whether a file's 'created date' is the same as its 'modified date' on a CD, and whether this constitutes factual testimony or requires an expert opinion.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018611.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, where an attorney addresses the judge. The attorney discusses the permissible scope of testimony for a witness, Mr. Flatley, expressing concern that a November 26 disclosure suggests expert opinion on metadata verification, while indicating acceptance if the testimony is confined to factual information from an earlier September disclosure.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018610.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case dated August 10, 2022. The judge, Ms. Moe, and Ms. Menninger discuss the timeline for investigating a potential violation of a sequestration order, deciding not to expedite the matter due to a person named Brian's travel plans. Ms. Menninger also raises a new issue, highlighting a discrepancy between a recent letter from the government and information she received in a prior conferral.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016777.jpg

This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details a legal argument between prosecution (Ms. Comey) and defense (Ms. Menninger) counsel. The core issue is whether the defense can introduce evidence related to broader investigative steps, such as a 2019 search, that were not part of the evidence presented to the jury. The prosecution argues this would be confusing and violate a court order, while the defense attempts to justify its relevance.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016776.jpg

This document is a court transcript page from August 10, 2022, where an attorney, Mr. Everdell, argues about the vast amount of data ('millions of files') seized from Mr. Epstein's residence in 2019, contrasting it with the limited evidence presented by the government. A discussion ensues about the witness who testified on this matter, with another attorney, Ms. Comey, correcting Mr. Everdell that the witness was Kimberly Meder, not Mr. Flatley.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013094.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect and recross examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley. Attorney Pomerantz questions him about emails he reviewed in Government Exhibit 54, specifically concerning the email address gmax1@mindspring.com. Attorney Menninger then conducts a recross examination, focusing on Mr. Flatley's technical understanding of email clients like Outlook and Mail.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013083.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley, by an attorney, Ms. Menninger. The questioning concerns a hard drive (exhibit GX54) found in Mr. Epstein's New York home. Prior to the cross-examination, Mr. Flatley reads a quote describing a very close partnership and friendship between individuals named 'Jeffrey' and 'Ghislaine'.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013081.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony focuses on the authentication of Government Exhibits 421/421B and 422/422B. Specifically, Exhibit 421 is identified as a 'Help wanted' ad for a massage therapist in Palm Beach, and the digital metadata (Exhibit 421B) links the document's creation and saving on September 17, 2001, to a user named 'gmax'.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013073.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a portion of the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley, by counsel Ms. Pomerantz. During the testimony, Government Exhibits 418 and 418R are admitted into evidence, with the court noting that 418 is sealed due to third-party phone numbers, and Mr. Flatley identifies another exhibit (418B) as showing the properties of exhibit 418.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013072.jpg

This page is a transcript from a court proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz questions witness Mr. Flatley to authenticate Government Exhibits 418 (unredacted) and 418R (redacted), establishing they were printed from 'Government 54' (a master evidence source). The government moves to offer Exhibit 418 under seal and 418R publicly.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
2
Total
2

Information contained in Government Exhibits 419 and 54

From: Unnamed Questioner
To: Mr. Flatley

An unnamed questioner conducts a direct examination of Mr. Flatley, asking him to identify details from Government Exhibit 54. Mr. Flatley confirms the software install date was February 22, 2001, the product was Microsoft Windows 2000, and the registered organization and owner was 'Gmax'.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: MS. POMERANTZ
To: Mr. Flatley

Questioning regarding metadata dates and titles of Government Exhibits 420, 418R, and 418B.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search