| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged co conspirators |
14
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Virginia L. Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
14
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employee |
14
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co conspirators alleged |
13
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged co conspirator |
13
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Heriberto Tellez
|
Inmate warden |
13
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
Laura A. Menninger
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Client |
13
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Judge Alison J. Nathan
|
Defendant judge |
12
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Adam Mueller
|
Client |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Juror defendant |
12
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Adversarial |
12
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Abuser victim |
12
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Business associate |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
William JULIÉ
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
TODD BLANCHE
|
Interviewer interviewee |
12
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Diana Fabi Samson
|
Client |
12
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Virginia L. Giuffre
|
Adversarial |
12
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Espinosa
|
Professional |
12
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co subjects of investigation |
12
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
8 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Ghislaine Maxwell's relationship with Epstein continuing and her responsibilitie... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Jeffrey Epstein's involvement in managing the lives of people, specifically maki... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell began looking for real estate for her dad and Epstein asked for help finding an... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Family businesses were lost after Ghislaine Maxwell's father's passing. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein asked Ghislaine Maxwell to continue helping him (find a house, etc.) after her father's d... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell states no one from the government had spoken to her about her case or Mr. Epste... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Reid (potentially Reid Hoffman) being a 'Silicon Valley guy' and how Ghislaine M... | San Francisco (mentioned) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Questioning Ghislaine Maxwell about her relationship with Mr. Epstein being separate from her oth... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Questioning Ghislaine Maxwell about whether Mr. Epstein had a relationship with Reid Hoffman. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Questioning Ghislaine Maxwell about observing Reid Hoffman flying with her or Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell introducing a masseuse (DOJ REDACTION) to Jeffrey Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell's efforts to find masseuses for Jeffrey Epstein, including visiting legitimate ... | Massage spas, Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell's lack of knowledge about law enforcement interest in her. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Ghislaine Maxwell and Ms. Mills, after President Clinton left office. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Social parties hosted by Mr. Epstein where young women, characterized as masseuses, were guests o... | Mr. Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Ghislaine Maxwell attending weddings of famous people with Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conversation between Ghislaine Maxwell and Todd Blanche regarding past events, specifically massa... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Mr. Epstein's non-prosecution deal made by the U.S. Attorney in Florida. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell filed twelve pretrial motions seeking to dismiss portions of the S1 superseding... | Southern District of New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grand jury returned a second (S2) superseding indictment. | Southern District of New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Business meetings on a plane involving Jeffrey Epstein and Les Wexner, attended by Ghislaine Maxw... | on the plane | View |
| N/A | N/A | Accusation by the government that Epstein paid Maxwell millions for recruiting young, underage wo... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell discusses finding a house for rent for someone in New York, which she initially... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Epstein's financial success and how he accumulated his money. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Epstein's past as a math teacher at Dalton and his work at Bear Stearns. | N/A | View |
This document is a letter dated May 7, 2025, from U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer to the Clerk of the Supreme Court regarding the case Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States of America (No. 24-1073). The Solicitor General requests a 30-day extension, until June 13, 2025, to file the government's response to Maxwell's petition for a writ of certiorari, citing a heavy workload. Attached is a service list identifying Sara Kropf and David Oscar Markus as counsel for the petitioner.
This document is a Certificate of Compliance for a Petition for Writ of Certiorari submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell (Petitioner) against the United States of America. The document certifies the word count of the petition (4,956 words) and is notarized by Aza Salinder Donner in the District of Columbia on April 10, 2025.
This document is an amended application to the US Supreme Court requesting a 45-day extension for Ghislaine Maxwell to file a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. Her new attorney, David Oscar Markus, cites his recent retention and conflicting trial schedules as reasons for the delay. The application highlights a legal question regarding a circuit split on whether plea agreements are binding on federal prosecutors across different districts.
This document is a formal legal opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirming the conviction and 240-month prison sentence of Ghislaine Maxwell for sex trafficking and related offenses. The court rejected Maxwell's appeal on five grounds, including arguments regarding a non-prosecution agreement, statute of limitations, juror misconduct, jury instructions, and sentencing reasonableness. The document also includes a subsequent order from November 2024 denying Maxwell's petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc.
This document is a Certificate of Service filed in the Supreme Court of the United States, indicating that on January 15, 2025, Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel, David Oscar Markus, served an Application for Extension of Time to File Certiorari Petition to the Solicitor General of the United States. The document provides contact information for Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel and the address of the Department of Justice.
Ghislaine Maxwell, appearing pro-se, responds to the Defendants' (Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and executors) motion to dismiss her case for failure to prosecute. She argues that she has complied with court orders despite the constraints of incarceration and seeks indemnification for legal expenses based on Virgin Islands common law, corporate law, and the NES LLC operating agreement. She asserts that public policy and the "unclean hands" of the executors should not bar her claims.
This document is a court transmittal form from the Clerk of the Court (Veronica J. Handy) to Tamara Charles, Clerk of the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands. It references a filing dated May 18, 2023, received from Ghislaine Maxwell. There is a discrepancy between the document date (October 11, 2023) and the court filing stamp (October 03, 2023).
In this May 2023 filing to the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, a pro se incarcerated Ghislaine Maxwell requests a 180-day stay in her civil suit for indemnification against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. Maxwell argues she needs time to find new counsel following her previous attorney's withdrawal, citing severe communication restrictions and lack of access to legal resources (computers, state case law) within FCI Tallahassee. She also argues the civil case should be paused pending the outcome of her criminal appeal (2nd Circuit Case 22-14626-CR) and cites a 2002 lawsuit (Shanks v. Wexner) as evidence that Epstein historically indemnified her for legal costs.
A court order from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands dated September 19, 2023, dismissing Ghislaine Maxwell's complaint against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein, executors Indyke and Kahn, and NES, LLC. The dismissal was granted based on a failure to prosecute or alternatively to compel the plaintiff to appear pro se. The order is signed by Presiding Judge Harold W.L. Willocks.
A Record of Proceedings from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands dated March 17, 2023, regarding a civil debt case (ST-2020-CV-00155) filed by Ghislaine Maxwell against the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. Maxwell appeared pro se for a status conference and confirmed her intent to proceed with the lawsuit while requesting 60 days to find new counsel, which the defense did not oppose. The proceedings lasted from 10:00 a.m. to 10:04 a.m.
This document is a court order from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands filed on February 15, 2023, in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell v. Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein et al. The order schedules a remote hearing for March 17, 2023, to determine if Maxwell intends to pursue her indemnification claims, noting that her previous attorney withdrew in September 2022 and she has not responded to prior orders. The court directs the order to be sent to FCI Tallahassee, where Maxwell is incarcerated, to facilitate her appearance via Microsoft Teams.
This document is a Notice of Entry of Order from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, filed on February 15, 2023. It notifies Ghislaine Maxwell (Plaintiff) and various attorneys that an order was entered regarding case ST-2020-CV-00155, a debt action against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein, his executors (Indyke and Kahn), and NES, LLC.
A Notice of Entry of Order from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands filed on September 8, 2022. The document concerns a debt action (Case ST-2020-CV-00155) brought by Ghislaine Maxwell against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein, his executors (Indyke and Kahn), and NES, LLC. The notice informs the listed attorneys that an order dated September 7, 2022, has been entered into the record.
This document is a court order from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands dated September 7, 2022, in the civil case of Ghislaine Maxwell vs. Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein et al. The court granted the motion for Maxwell's attorneys (Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A. and Kyle R. Waldner) to withdraw as counsel. The case was stayed for 60 days to allow Maxwell to find new representation, with instructions that all future legal correspondence be mailed directly to her at FCI Tallahassee.
A Case Information and Litigant Data Form filed in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands on August 25, 2022, for case ST-2020-CV-00155. The plaintiff is Ghislaine Maxwell, currently incarcerated at FCI Tallahassee, and the case involves a claim for indemnification under contract and corporate law theories. The document lists Kyle R. Waldner as the attorney signing on behalf of the plaintiff.
This document is a Notice of Entry of Order from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, dated August 9, 2022. It concerns case ST-2020-CV-00155, a debt action filed by Ghislaine Maxwell against the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The notice informs legal counsel that an order was entered on that date.
This document is a Supplemental Brief filed on August 1, 2022, by the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Indyke and Kahn) in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands. The brief supports a Motion to Dismiss Ghislaine Maxwell's complaint seeking indemnification from the Estate. The Co-Executors argue that because Maxwell was convicted of intentional criminal acts (sex trafficking and conspiracy) in the Southern District of New York on June 29, 2022, public policy prohibits enforcing any contract or equitable doctrine that would indemnify her for the financial consequences of her crimes.
This document is a legal brief filed by Ghislaine Maxwell in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. Maxwell argues that Virgin Islands public policy does not prevent her from seeking indemnification (reimbursement) for legal fees and security costs incurred due to her employment with Epstein, despite her criminal conviction in New York (SDNY). She asserts claims based on contract promises, common law joint tortfeasor indemnity, and corporate indemnity laws regarding her role at NES, LLC.
This document is a Record of Proceedings from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands dated July 29, 2022, regarding a civil debt case (ST-2020-CV-00155) between plaintiff Ghislaine Maxwell and the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The hearing was a status conference presided over by Judge Harold W.L. Willocks, where parties were directed to meet and confer regarding oral arguments for a Motion to Dismiss and a Government motion to intervene. The document lists attorneys present for both sides and notes a related case, ST-2020-CV-00014.
Court order from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands dated July 1, 2022, in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell v. Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. Staff Master Joseph T. Gasper schedules a remote status conference for July 29, 2022, to discuss case management, including a pending motion to intervene by the VI Government and a motion to dismiss by the Estate. The document references delays requested by Maxwell's counsel due to her criminal case in the Southern District of New York.
Record of Proceedings from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands dated March 9, 2022, regarding a civil debt case (ST-2020-CV-00155) filed by Ghislaine Maxwell against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and its executors, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, as well as NES, LLC. The document details a status hearing presided over by Judge Harold W.L. Willocks, attended by attorneys Kyle R. Waldner and Christopher A. Kroblin. The court set a deadline of August 1, 2022, for the parties to file briefs.
A court order from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands dated February 22, 2022, in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell v. Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein et al. (Case No. ST-2020-CV-00155). Judge Harold W.L. Willocks ordered a status conference to be held via Zoom on March 9, 2022. The defendants include Epstein's estate, his executors Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, and NES, LLC.
This document is a Notice of Entry of Order from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands filed on December 7, 2021. It pertains to three consolidated cases involving the Government of the USVI, the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (with Darren K. Indyke as executor), and Ghislaine Maxwell (seeking indemnification). The notice lists numerous recipients, including judges and attorneys involved in the proceedings.
This document is a 'Plaintiff's Reply to Co-Executors' Brief' filed on April 13, 2021, in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands by Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team. Maxwell argues that her indemnification case against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein should not be transferred to the Complex Litigation Division nor assigned to the same judge handling the 'CICO action' (Government v. Indyke). She asserts that her case does not meet the criteria for complex litigation and shares no common facts or claims with the government's racketeering case against the executors.
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on April 2, 2021, in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands for Case No. ST-20-CV-155 (Ghislaine Maxwell v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein et al.). Attorney Gordon C. Rhea enters his appearance as counsel for Defendant Richard D. Kahn, who is an Executor of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The document includes a Certificate of Service confirming the filing was served electronically to attorneys Kyle Waldner, Christopher Kroblin, Shari N. D’Andrade, and Carol Thomas-Jacobs.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Trust/Spouse | $0.00 | Transfers characterized by government as 'funne... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Annie | $0.00 | Purchase of cowboy boots during shopping trip | View |
| N/A | Received | Trust Fund | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $80,000.00 | Annual income from trust fund | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Finances received by Maxwell for participating ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $30,000,000.00 | Total amount Maxwell received from Epstein acco... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Purchase of huge black helicopter. | View |
| N/A | Received | buyer | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Proceeds from the sale of Ms. Maxwell's London ... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Court | $0.00 | Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Clerk of the Cour... | $300.00 | Lump sum payment of criminal monetary penalties. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Purchase of a large townhouse for Ms. Maxwell. | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Airline/Travel pr... | $0.00 | Flew to France at her own expense to help mother. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Purchase of helicopter, homes in NY and London,... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | U.S. District Cou... | $750,000.00 | Fine imposed by District Court | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | U.S. District Cou... | $300.00 | Mandatory special assessment | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | The Terramar Project | $0.00 | Ghislaine devoted her own financial resources t... | View |
| N/A | Received | A. Farmer | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Witness filed a civil lawsuit seeking damages a... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Buying a helicopter and paying for flight lessons. | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Trust/Spouse | $0.00 | Transfers to a trust/spouse characterized by go... | View |
| N/A | Received | Lender (implied) | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Significant loans procured on the basis of a ne... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Court/Government | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Purchase of a helicopter, homes in NY and Londo... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Court | $0.00 | Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Henri Bendel | $0.00 | Purchases made at the store which led to the de... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | THE COURT | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
Seeking reconsideration claiming constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
An essay authored by the defendant.
Seeking reconsideration claiming constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Denial of application (Ex. H)
Essay where Maxwell described her relationship with Epstein.
Directives given by agents when they announced themselves.
Defendant reported assets of approx $3.8 million.
Argument that confinement impairs ability to communicate effectively with counsel.
Maxwell would call and set up appointment times.
Maxwell calling to schedule massage appointments.
Rules regarding service, stationery, breakfast, and household management.
Video screen meetings to review discovery documents projected on a wall.
Request for personal references/letters of reference for future jobs.
Birthday wishes and Christmas wishes.
Did you have fun? You're such a good girl. And I'm so happy you were able to come. This is really great. And he obviously likes you a lot.
Asked to make appointment because TV in Blue Room has poor reception.
Question confirms this call did NOT happen.
Witness confirms she had never talked to Maxwell before coming to New York.
Ghislaine would tell the witness who she needed to talk to in a day (landscapers, designers, etc.).
Phone number on a piece of paper
Maxwell called Kate after receiving the number.
Invitation to go to tea at Maxwell's house.
Complaint that nighttime security checks interfere with ability to prepare for trial; request to modify procedures.
Interviewing personal assistants in the back of a limo.
Complaints about lack of privacy in open areas and poor ventilation in visiting rooms.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity