Adam Mueller
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Ty Gee
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ty Gee
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Professional co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-22 | Legal filing deadline | Due date selected for Ghislaine Maxwell's opening brief in her appeal. | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2020-10-13 | Legal proceeding | The set date for the argument of appeal. | UNITED STATES COURT OF APPE... | View |
| 2020-10-08 | N/A | Submission of Document 94 in Case 20-3061 | Court of Appeals (implied b... | View |
| 2020-10-08 | Legal filing | Filing of 'Ghislaine Maxwell’s Reply Brief' in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second ... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2020-09-28 | Legal filing | Filing of "Ms. Maxwell's Response to the Government's Motion to Dismiss Appeal" with the court. | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2020-09-24 | N/A | Filing of Unredacted Opening Brief and Sealed Appendix Vol. 2 in US v. Maxwell Case No. 20-3061. | US Court of Appeals for the... | View |
| 2020-09-24 | Legal filing | Filing of a Motion Information Statement by Adam Mueller on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES COURT OF APPE... | View |
| 2020-09-24 | Court filing | Submission of Document 63 in Case 20-3061. | N/A | View |
| 2020-09-24 | N/A | Filing of Ghislaine Maxwell's Opening Brief | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2020-09-24 | N/A | Submission of legal document (Document 60 in Case 20-3061) | Denver, CO (Filing location) | View |
| 2020-09-23 | Legal filing | Submission of Document 54 in Case 20-3061. | N/A | View |
| 2020-09-10 | Legal filing | A legal document was filed with the court requesting the consolidation of two cases. | Court (implied) | View |
| 2020-09-10 | N/A | Filing of Motion Information Statement in Case 20-3061 | United States Court of Appe... | View |
20-3061_Documents.pdf
This document is the complete appellate record for case 20-3061, an interlocutory appeal by Ghislaine Maxwell against the United States. Maxwell appealed a District Court order denying her motion to modify a protective order, seeking permission to share confidential criminal discovery materials under seal with the judge in a related civil case (Giuffre v. Maxwell) to challenge the government's acquisition of evidence. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, ruling that the protective order decision was not a final judgment or an appealable collateral order, and denied Maxwell's motion to consolidate the criminal appeal with the civil appeal.
EFTA00028538.pdf
This document is an automated email notification (Notice of Docket Activity) from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, dated September 28, 2020. It confirms the filing of an 'Opposition to Motion to dismiss' in the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Case No. 20-3061). The notice lists attorneys Ty Gee, Adam Mueller, and Laura Menninger as recipients, alongside Deputy Clerk Gerard Whidbee.
EFTA00025378.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from the US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit regarding the case United States of America v. Maxwell (20-3061). Dated September 16, 2020, it serves as a Notice of Docket Activity announcing a scheduling order that sets the due date for Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell's brief and the Joint Appendix to October 22, 2020. The notice lists several recipients, including attorneys Ty Gee, Laura Menninger, and Adam Mueller, alongside Deputy Clerk Gerard Whidbee, with other recipient names redacted.
EFTA00023748.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 2020 regarding the filing of legal documents in the case US v. Maxwell (Case No. 20-3061). Nicole Simmons of the law firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. sent an unredacted opening brief and sealed appendix to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ('newcases@ca2.uscourts.gov') at the request of Adam Mueller. The email was subsequently forwarded to personnel at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS).
EFTA00023745.pdf
This document is a Notice of Docket Activity from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, dated September 10, 2020. It confirms the filing of 'EXHIBITS, volume(s) 1 of 7' on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell in the case *United States of America v. Maxwell*. The notice lists several attorneys, including Ty Gee, Adam Mueller, and Laura Menninger, who were electronically served with this document.
EFTA00023127.pdf
This document is an automated Notice of Docket Activity from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, dated September 23, 2020. It confirms the filing of supplementary papers to a motion (correcting a previously defective document) on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell in case 20-3061. The notice was electronically mailed to attorneys Ty Gee, Laura Menninger, and Adam Mueller, as well as Deputy Clerk Gerard Whidbee.
EFTA00014595.pdf
A 'Notice of Docket Activity' email from the Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit, regarding the case Giuffre v. Maxwell (20-2413). The document confirms the filing of a 'Notice of Hearing Date Acknowledgment' on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell on October 9, 2020, and lists the attorneys served electronically with the notice.
EFTA00010292.pdf
This document is an automatic email notification from the US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit regarding the case 'United States of America v. Maxwell' (Case Number 20-3061). It confirms that on October 8, 2020, a motion to seal a document was filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. The notification lists various recipients, including attorneys and court clerks, though several names (particularly Assistant U.S. Attorneys) are redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00001824.jpg
This document is a Mandate and Summary Order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061-cr). Issued on November 9, 2020, following an October 19, 2020 term, it lists the presiding judges and legal representation for both the prosecution (SDNY) and the defense. The document confirms the filing of the order in the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00019606.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 15 of 15, internal page 14) of a legal response filed on September 28, 2020, in Case 20-3061. Attorneys Adam Mueller and Ty Gee of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. submit the filing on behalf of Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell. The document includes a Certificate of Compliance regarding word count and a Certificate of Service confirming the filing of 'Ms. Maxwell’s Response to the Government’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal'.
DOJ-OGR-00019592.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal filing from September 28, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061) before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The filing is Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the government's motion to dismiss her appeal, submitted by her attorneys Ty Gee and Adam Mueller of the law firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. The appeal originates from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00019590.jpg
This document is page 6 of a court filing (Case 20-3061) dated September 24, 2020. It contains a Certificate of Compliance signed by Adam Mueller confirming the motion meets word count limitations, and a Certificate of Service signed by Nicole Simmons confirming the filing of an 'Unopposed Motion for Leave to File under Seal' regarding Appendix Volume 2 via CM/ECF.
DOJ-OGR-00019589.jpg
This document is the signature page of a legal filing (Document 63) from Case 20-3061, dated September 24, 2020. It was submitted by attorneys Ty Gee and Adam Mueller of the law firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C., on behalf of their client, Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00019585.jpg
This is a Motion Information Statement filed on September 24, 2020, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the case of United States v. Maxwell (Docket No. 20-3061). Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Adam Mueller, is requesting permission to file several documents under seal, including an unredacted brief and Appendix Volume 2, arguing they contain confidential material. The motion states that the opposing counsel for the United States, Maurene Comey, does not oppose this request.
DOJ-OGR-00019439.jpg
This legal document from Case 20-3061, dated September 24, 2020, contains two certifications related to a court filing. Adam Mueller certifies that a brief complies with federal court rules regarding word count (7,343 words) and formatting, while Nicole Simmons certifies that she filed 'Ms. Maxwell’s Opening Brief' with the court and served it to all counsel of record via the CM/ECF system.
DOJ-OGR-00019438.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 39 of 58) of a legal filing submitted on September 24, 2020, for Case 20-3061. It lists attorneys Ty Gee and Adam Mueller of the Denver-based law firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. as counsel for the Defendant-Appellant, Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00019400.jpg
This document is the cover page for Ghislaine Maxwell's Opening Brief filed on September 24, 2020, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case 20-3061). It appeals a decision from the Southern District of New York (Case 20-CR-330) involving the United States of America. The document lists her legal representation as Ty Gee and Adam Mueller of the Denver-based firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
DOJ-OGR-00019399.jpg
This legal document from Case 20-3061, dated September 23, 2020, contains two certifications related to a court filing for Ghislaine Maxwell. Counsel Adam Mueller certifies that the response brief complies with the court's word count rules, and Nicole Simmons certifies that she has filed "Ghislaine Maxwell's Response to Opposition to Motion to Consolidate" with the court and served it to all counsel of record.
DOJ-OGR-00019398.jpg
This document is the signature page for a legal filing (Document 54 in Case 20-3061) dated September 23, 2020. It was submitted by attorneys Adam Mueller and Ty Gee of the Denver-based law firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. on behalf of their client, Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00019343.jpg
This document is a Motion Information Statement filed on September 16, 2020, by the United States of America in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 20-3061). The motion, submitted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey, seeks to dismiss Maxwell's appeal on the grounds of a lack of jurisdiction. The document identifies the legal representatives for both parties and confirms that the opposing counsel, Adam Mueller, has been notified and intends to file a response.
DOJ-OGR-00019340.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated September 15, 2020, from attorney Adam Mueller of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C., to Gerard Whidbee at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Mueller, representing Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, formally selects October 22, 2020, as the due date for filing her opening brief in the case of United States v. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00019300.jpg
This document is the conclusion page of a legal filing dated September 10, 2020, from the law firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. On behalf of their client, Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, the attorneys request that the court consolidate two separate cases: United States v. Maxwell (Case No. 20-3061) and Giuffre v. Maxwell (Case No. 20-2413).
DOJ-OGR-00019282.jpg
This document is a Motion Information Statement filed on September 10, 2020, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case 20-3061, United States v. Maxwell). Attorney Adam Mueller, representing Ghislaine Maxwell, is requesting leave to file an unredacted motion to consolidate under seal. The document indicates that opposing counsel, Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey, does not oppose the motion.
DOJ-OGR-00019688.jpg
This is a Summary Order and Mandate from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, issued on November 9, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061-cr). The document lists the panel of judges (Cabranes, Pooler, Raggi) who presided over the term held on October 19, 2020. It identifies the legal counsel for both the Appellee (US Attorneys including Lara Pomerantz and Maurene Comey) and the Defendant-Appellant (Adam Mueller and Ty Gee of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.).
DOJ-OGR-00019683.jpg
This document is the first page of a Summary Order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated October 19, 2020. It lists the judicial panel (Judges Cabranes, Pooler, and Raggi) presiding over the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061-cr). It identifies the legal counsel for both the United States (Appellee) and Maxwell (Defendant-Appellant).
Notification of Motion
Movant notified opposing counsel as required by Local Rule 27.1
Case 20-3061, Document 94
Submission of legal document (signature page)
United States v. Maxwell, No. 20-3061 (2d Cir.)
A letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel, Adam Mueller, to the court selecting October 22, 2020, as the due date for her opening brief for her appeal, noting that no transcript will be required.
Motion Information Statement
Filing regarding Leave to File Unredacted Motion to Consolidate under Seal
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity