| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
The Board (NLRB)
|
Unknown |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Various employers, unions, and interest groups
|
Unknown |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Various employers, unions, and interest groups
|
Labor management |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Guaranteed right for employees to organize a union to negotiate with their employer. | workplace | View |
| N/A | N/A | Guaranteed right for employees to strike and picket, depending on the purpose. | workplace | View |
| N/A | N/A | Illegal action for an employer to question employees about union support in a discouraging manner. | workplace | View |
This document is page 65 of a court filing (Document 562) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 17, 2021. It contains Jury Instruction No. 46, which directs the jury on how to weigh testimony provided by law enforcement officials and government employees, specifically noting that such testimony should not automatically receive greater weight than that of ordinary witnesses.
This court transcript excerpt discusses the roles and relationships of individuals involved in a scheme, specifically focusing on the defendant's leadership over Sarah Kellen and their shared association with Jeffrey Epstein and Maxwell. It highlights evidence from flight records showing the defendant and Sarah Kellen traveling on Epstein's private jet, indicating an overlap in their involvement as close associates in an ongoing scheme. The discussion also touches upon legal arguments regarding the supervision of criminal participants.
This document is Page 148 of 167 from a court filing (Document 563) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 18, 2021. It contains Jury Instruction No. 46, which guides the jury on how to evaluate testimony provided by law enforcement and government employees, specifically noting that their employment status does not automatically grant their testimony greater weight than that of ordinary witnesses.
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing jurisdictional standards for the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and outlining employee rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). It specifies financial thresholds for various employer categories and lists legal rights for employees (e.g., forming a union) and illegal actions by employers and unions. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein; its content is strictly about U.S. labor law.
This document, labeled HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018737, is a lease abstract from Stan Johnson Company for a proposed 12,770 sq. ft. office building in St. Thomas, USVI. It outlines a 10-year lease for the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) to house the Department of Homeland Security and USCIS, with an annual rent of $632,756.05. While the document itself does not contain any mention of Jeffrey Epstein, its location in the U.S. Virgin Islands and its inclusion in a House Oversight document set may provide contextual relevance to broader investigations in the region.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | taxpayers | Government employees | $30.00 | Proposed minimum tax on adjusted gross income (... | View |
| N/A | Received | taxpayers | Government employees | $3.80 | Surtax on net investment income. | View |
| N/A | Received | taxpayers | Government employees | $30.00 | Proposed minimum tax on adjusted gross income (... | View |
| N/A | Received | taxpayers | Government employees | $3.80 | Surtax on net investment income. | View |
| N/A | Received | taxpayers | Government employees | $45.00 | Proposed top transfer tax rate under the restor... | View |
| N/A | Received | taxpayers | Government employees | $45.00 | Proposed top transfer tax rate under the restor... | View |
The Court mentions a letter in which the government indicated its actions regarding notifying crime victims.
Ms. Moe states that the government has notified six individuals impacted by the offense, through their counsel, about the sentencing and their right to be heard.
The government representative states they "discussed and communicated with defense counsel about" an ongoing privilege review.
The document describes how the government repeatedly questioned Jane about abuse in New Mexico, despite her initial statements of having no memory of such events.
The government made an ex parte request which was granted. A similar request in a different civil case was rejected as an attempt to deprive Maxwell of notice.
A letter written by the government, intended for publication by the media, to 'effectively silence Juror No. 50' and circumvent the Court's orders.
A letter from the government is mentioned which rehashes arguments that the Court has already rejected.
Jane testified to the government that she was involved in sexualized massages with multiple people and provided their first names.
A witness who worked in the office communicated to the government about a person named Michelle.
The document references a 'Gov. Letter at 8' and 'Gov. Letter at 8 n.3', indicating a prior written communication from the government outlining its legal position on the photographs.
A government memorandum (Gov. Mem. at 6) is cited in a footnote as supporting the contention that the 2003 Amendment may be applied retroactively.
A request for unredacted copies of emails and correspondence concerning the NPA negotiation, which were previously produced by the government on August 13, 2020.
The government stated to the Court that the flashlight checks were a routine procedure by BOP officials.
In a letter, the government admitted that Ms. Maxwell is the only inmate who receives targeted flashlight checks every 15 minutes.
The government's answer brief ('Ans.Br.') is cited as offering a 'halfhearted defense' and 'no explanation' for its inconsistent legal positions.
A letter in which the government admitted that Ms. Maxwell is the only inmate who receives targeted flashlight checks every 15 minutes.
A 'government note' is discussed in the context of what the firm knew prior to its receipt.
The speaker, representing the government, argues that the Court should impose a sentence greater than the 188 to 235-month guideline. The justification is the defendant's dishonesty, the severity and scope of her sex-trafficking crimes, and the inadequacy of the 2003 sentencing guidelines, which the Supreme Court has allowed courts to exceed.
The Court received a letter with government objections close to 11 p.m. the previous night.
The government's November 12 letter argued that Exhibit 52 was Ms. Maxwell's book.
The government made a disclosure on April 12th regarding 226 witnesses, which the defense claims contains exculpatory information and requires intensive investigation.
The defense alerted the government that significant portions of the first three discovery productions were unreadable by Ms. Maxwell.
A legal filing arguing for a protective order on discovery materials, specifically requesting that restrictions on the use of these materials apply not only to the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, but also to the government's potential witnesses and their counsel.
Victim interviews were conducted in 2008 during which information about the NPA was omitted.
Conversations with victims' attorneys occurred in 2008 where information about the NPA was omitted.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity