Lawyers
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge
|
Procedural |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed individual ('he')
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
witnesses
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jury
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The jury
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jurors
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
accusers
|
Represented by |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Proposed hearing | A potential 'Show Hearing' is mentioned, which the filing argues the Court should reject and outl... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Disciplinary proceedings against Conrad where lawyers made complaints about her. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | A legal trial is taking place, during which these instructions are given. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition/Legal Interview | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Meeting | Carolyn had meetings with lawyers about the lawsuits before they were filed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | The document describes the procedural steps of a criminal trial, including opening statements, pr... | Court | View |
| 2021-12-19 | N/A | Final Arguments | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-07-19 | N/A | Call regarding lawyers (subject line) | Unknown | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Accusers obtained lawyers before talking to the FBI in connection with the case. | FBI (contextual) | View |
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | Witness preparing to testify in a civil case. | Unknown | View |
| 2009-08-01 | N/A | Alfredo Rodriguez attempts to sell stolen journal to lawyers. | Unknown | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Filing of two civil lawsuits by Carolyn. | Civil Court | View |
| 1998-07-28 | N/A | Monica Lewinsky's lawyers strike immunity deal with Starr. | Unknown | View |
EFTA00030619.pdf
This document is an email header dated July 19, 2019. The sender and recipients are redacted. The subject line is 'Call w/ [Redacted] Lawyers', suggesting legal coordination during the period following Jeffrey Epstein's arrest in July 2019. The document ID is EFTA00030619.
DOJ-OGR-00008463.jpg
This page contains Jury Instruction No. 2 ('Role of the Jury') filed on December 17, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The text instructs the jury that they are the sole judges of facts and credibility, and clarifies that statements made by lawyers or rulings made by the judge do not constitute evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00001384.jpg
This document is page 12 of a legal filing (Case 21-770) dated April 19, 2021, in which Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team argues against the Government's narrative regarding her confinement. The defense claims that unsanitary conditions are caused by others, accuses the Government of a double standard and HIPAA violations for releasing Maxwell's vaccination status while keeping accusers anonymous, and asserts that her vaccination does not resolve issues regarding her ability to prepare for trial using 'ancient' technology.
DOJ-OGR-00000916.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 21-770) dated April 1, 2021, outlining legal issues presented for review regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. It argues that her detention conditions—including sleep deprivation, surveillance, solitary confinement, lack of food/water, and inability to review discovery documents—prevent her from effectively preparing a defense. It also challenges the trial court's decision to deny bail based on 'old, anonymous, unconfronted, hearsay accusations' from the government.
DOJ-OGR-00000554.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019. An unidentified speaker, likely an attorney, explains the complexities of a client's sex offender registration obligations under the federal SORNA statute due to having multiple residences in states like Florida and New Mexico. The speaker notes that while efforts were made to comply, authorities in New Mexico ultimately determined that registration was not required, and the court acknowledges understanding the situation.
DOJ-OGR-00016129.jpg
This document is page 19 of 106 from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains standard jury instructions delivered by the judge, explaining that statements by lawyers, objections, and excluded testimony do not constitute evidence. The judge instructs the jury to rely on their common sense and life experience when evaluating testimony and exhibits.
DOJ-OGR-00002077.jpg
This document, a legal filing from December 14, 2020, compiles four news articles from July and August 2019 to illustrate how Ghislaine Maxwell became a prominent media target. The articles from The New York Times, The Washington Post, New York Post, and Vanity Fair depict her deep involvement with Jeffrey Epstein, her alleged role as a recruiter, and her status as a high-profile figure of public interest, even labeling her 'America's Most Wanted Woman'.
DOJ-OGR-00022355.jpg
This document is a heavily redacted contact list, likely related to activities in Paris, France. It contains names of individuals such as Phillipe Junot and Betty Lagardere, as well as various businesses including hotels (Hotel Crillon) and restaurants (L'Arpege, Le Voltaire). The document is marked with the identifier DOJ-OGR-00022355 and a note at the top explains that redactions were made to protect personal contact information.
DOJ-OGR-00017206.jpg
This document is a transcript of a judge's charge to a jury, filed on August 10, 2022. The judge instructs the jury that they must follow the law as provided by the court, and that their exclusive role is to determine the facts by weighing evidence and witness credibility. The judge explicitly clarifies that statements made by lawyers during the trial are not to be considered evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00019834.jpg
This document serves as the 'Issues Presented' section of a legal filing dated April 1, 2021, related to Case 21-58. It outlines two main arguments: 1) Ms. Maxwell cannot prepare her defense due to horrific detention conditions (sleep deprivation, isolation, surveillance, inadequate technology for discovery review, and poor sustenance), and 2) The trial court erred in denying bail based on 'anonymous, unconfronted, hearsay accusations' provided by the government.
DOJ-OGR-00014585.jpg
This document is a jury charge from a legal proceeding, specifically Instruction No. 2 regarding the role of the jury. The judge instructs the jury that they are the exclusive judges of the facts and must base their verdict solely on the evidence presented, while also being bound to follow the law exactly as the judge provides it. The document clarifies that statements, arguments, and questions from lawyers do not constitute evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00005320.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on October 22, 2021, containing instructions to the jury pool. The text outlines strict prohibitions against jurors discussing the case on social media or conducting independent research via Google or news outlets. It also details privacy and safety measures due to the 'high-profile' nature of the case and COVID-19, including the use of juror numbers instead of names and the provision of daily transportation for jurors.
DOJ-OGR-00011684.jpg
This document is page 19 of a court transcript (Document 741) filed on August 10, 2022, from the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). It contains standard jury instructions delivered by the judge, explaining that lawyer statements and objections are not evidence, and instructing jurors to use their common sense when evaluating testimony. The page bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00011684.
DOJ-OGR-00011681.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript, likely a judge's instructions to a jury. It outlines the sequence of a criminal trial, clarifying that only testimony from witnesses and exhibits constitute evidence, not the lawyers' opening or closing statements. The text emphasizes the defendant's presumption of innocence, stating she is not required to offer proof, and concludes by noting that jury deliberations are secret.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031593.jpg
This document is an email chain from March 29, 2015, between Jeffrey Epstein and journalist Michael Wolff. They are coordinating a time to speak and discussing a draft text Wolff has written; Epstein objects to a sentence implying he never met Bill Clinton or Al Gore and complains that a section about women is too 'harsh,' stating he needs to consult his lawyers. The email implies Epstein was travelling by water as he mentions being 'back on land around 4'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027797.jpg
This document is a forensic log of text messages from June 15, 2019, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias e:jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. Epstein complains about a lack of privacy and 'many people coming to see me.' The conversation shifts to geopolitical commentary, referring to 'Donald' (Trump) as the 'Crazy father of the world' and discussing Saudi Arabia moving closer to China, which the correspondent describes as a 'GREAT OPPORTUNITY.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010554.jpg
This document appears to be a page (215) from a book or narrative report included in House Oversight evidence. It details Jeffrey Epstein's release from 'the Stockade' on July 21, 2009, after serving less than 13 months. The text outlines the conditions of his release, including his designation as a level 3 sex offender, registration requirements, and house arrest in Palm Beach.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013373.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing, likely a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by attorney Edwards. It argues that Edwards properly represented three victims of sexual assault against Jeffrey Epstein and that Epstein's subsequent lawsuit against Edwards is a baseless, retaliatory tactic by a 'serial pedophile' to avoid accountability and public disclosure. The text characterizes Epstein as using his wealth to manipulate the legal system and attacks the credibility of Epstein's 'Second Amended Complaint.'
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Unknown | Lawyers | $0.00 | Inquiry regarding who is authorized to make pay... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Lawyers | $0.00 | Epstein paying lawyers to 'do his dirty work'. | View |
| N/A | Received | Unknown | Lawyers | $0.00 | Prosecutor argues lawyers were already paid lon... | View |
Legal Defense
Meetings are allegedly videotaped and audio recorded by guards.
Sharing underage girls
Question regarding whether Andrew and Epstein shared girls; Kellen invokes the Fifth.
Sexual acts with Prince Andrew
Question regarding performing sexually on Prince Andrew; Marcinkova invokes the Fifth.
Questions related to a lawsuit
The questioner describes interrogatories as 'questions sent by lawyers -- to your lawyer for you to answer under oath' in connection with a lawsuit.
Messages
Taking messages for lawyers when they weren't available.
Proffers
Discussions where lawyers and witnesses were present with the government.
Legal Defense Preparation
Meetings are described as unsafe due to the pandemic, hindering trial preparation.
Testimony preparation
Discussed stories with lawyers and media.
Prince Andrew's relations with Epstein
Questioning regarding Prince Andrew; witnesses invoked the Fifth Amendment.
Sale of Journal
Rodriguez attempted to sell the stolen journal for $50,000.
Civil complaint accuracy
Testimony regarding trafficking and abuse; defense claims Maxwell was not mentioned.
Lawsuits
Meetings with lawyers regarding civil complaints.
Relationship with Monica Lewinsky
Questioning regarding the nature of Clinton's relationship with Lewinsky and the definition of sexual relations.
Civil business case
Deposition regarding a case in Philadelphia.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity