R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
20
Very Strong
|
31 | |
|
person
A. Marie Villafaña
|
Professional |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
A. Marie Villafaña
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Prosecutor defendant |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
A. Marie Villafaña
|
Professional subordinate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
A. MARIE VILLAFANA
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ.
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Marie Villafaña
|
Professional superior subordinate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA)
|
Professional subordinate supervisor |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
James Patterson
|
Subject author |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
OPR
|
Investigative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
A. MARIE VILLAFANA
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional prosecutor defendant |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Matthew Menchel
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew C. Lourie
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Prosecutor subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ann Marie C. Villafaña
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney (unnamed)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey H. Sloman
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Marie Villafaña
|
Professional subordinate superior |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Matthew I. Menchel
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
FBI Special Agent (Redacted)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Review of evidence and assessment of likelihood of success for trial. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | OPR interview of Acosta regarding his decisions in the Epstein case, where Acosta conceded the NP... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | Execution of a non-Prosecution Agreement where Jeffrey Epstein waives his right to be indicted by... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deferral of prosecution for offenses by the United States Attorney for the Southern District of F... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) entered into by the United States Attorney's Office, Southern Dis... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Execution of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement for Epstein to plead guilty to specific Florida statutes in exchange for deferred feder... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement for deferred prosecution by the United States Attorney, in favor of prosecution by the ... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Federal case development | An Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA) opened a file and worked with FBI case agents to develop a fede... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Acosta's decision to employ Petite policy analysis in Epstein's case, aiming to avert a 'manifest... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement for deferred prosecution of Epstein in the Southern District of Florida, contingent on ... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | A Non-Prosecution Agreement was made between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein, deferring federal prosecu... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | Signing of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | A deferred prosecution agreement where federal prosecution of Epstein is deferred in favor of pro... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | Acosta resigns as Secretary of Labor. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2011-03-20 | N/A | Acosta writes letter regarding pressure during plea negotiations. | N/A | View |
| 2008-12-08 | N/A | Acosta formally recused from all matters involving a specific law firm (cut off in text). | Florida | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Motion filed to seal Search Warrant Application regarding ongoing grand jury investigation | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2007-10-30 | N/A | Assistant U.S. Attorney signs the Addendum on behalf of R. Alexander Acosta. | Unknown | View |
| 2007-10-30 | Legal agreement signing | A. Marie Villafana signed the addendum on behalf of the U.S. Attorney. | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-30 | Legal agreement signing | The U.S. Attorney's office, represented by A. Marie Villafana, signed an addendum to a Non-Prosec... | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-30 | Legal agreement signing | The U.S. Attorney's office, via a representative for A. Marie Villafaña, signed the Addendum to t... | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-30 | Signing of a legal document | The U.S. Attorney's office, via a representative, signed an addendum to a Non-Prosecution Agreeme... | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-30 | Legal agreement signing | A. Marie Villafaña signed the addendum on behalf of the U.S. Attorney. | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-30 | Legal agreement signing | A. Marie Villafaña, on behalf of U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, signed an Addendum to a Non-P... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000340.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) made with the defendant (Epstein) in the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) does not prevent his current prosecution in the Southern District of New York. The prosecution asserts that the language of the NPA explicitly limits its scope to the SDFL and does not cover the alleged conduct or victims in New York. The filing cites specific text from the NPA and legal precedent from the Second Circuit to support its position that one U.S. Attorney's office agreement does not bind another.
DOJ-OGR-00000315.jpg
This legal document argues that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein, authorized by U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, was limited in scope. It contends the NPA only barred federal prosecution for specific offenses within the Southern District of Florida and did not prevent the United States from bringing other federal criminal charges against him elsewhere. The document quotes the agreement to support its claim that the federal government's ability to prosecute Epstein was not fully relinquished.
DOJ-OGR-00000303.jpg
This document is the signature page of an Addendum to Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. It contains a certification that Epstein has read, understood, and agreed to comply with the clarifications to the agreement. The document is signed by Lilly Ann Sanchez, attorney for Epstein, on October 29, 2007, though it also lists signature blocks for U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, A. Marie Villafaña, and Gerald Lefcourt.
DOJ-OGR-00000302.jpg
This document is a signature page for an Addendum to a Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a handwritten signature and date (10/29/07) by Gerald Lefcourt, Epstein's counsel. The text certifies that Epstein understands the clarifications to the agreement and agrees to comply, although Epstein's own signature line is blank on this specific page. The document was later filed in court in 2016 and 2019 as indicated by the headers.
DOJ-OGR-00000301.jpg
This document is a signature page for an addendum to a Non-Prosecution Agreement, dated January 29, 2007. It is signed by Jeffrey Epstein, his attorneys Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez, and Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie Villafaña on behalf of U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta. By signing, Epstein certifies that he understands and agrees to comply with the clarifications to the agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00000299.jpg
This document is the signature page (Page 7 of 7) of a Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. It features the signature of his attorney, Lilly Ann Sanchez, dated September 24, 2007. The document lists other key legal figures including U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta and defense attorney Gerald Lefcourt, certifying that Epstein understands and agrees to the conditions of the agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00000298.jpg
This document is the signature page (Page 7 of 7) of the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement between the United States and Jeffrey Epstein. It features the handwritten signatures of Jeffrey Epstein and his lawyer Gerald Lefcourt, dated September 24, 2007, alongside certifications that Epstein understood the agreement's conditions. The document also lists U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta and A. Marie Villafana, though their signatures are not present on this specific page.
DOJ-OGR-00000297.jpg
This document is the signature page (Page 7 of 7) of a Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. It features Epstein's signature dated September 24, 2007, alongside signature blocks for U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, A. Marie Villafaña, and Epstein's defense team, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez. The text certifies that Epstein has read, understood, and agreed to comply with the conditions of the agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00000292.jpg
This document is a page from a legal agreement detailing a deferred prosecution deal for Epstein. Under the authority of U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, federal prosecution in the Southern District of Florida for sex trafficking offenses will be deferred in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida. The agreement stipulates that if Epstein violates its terms, federal prosecution can be initiated, but if he complies, all charges related to the joint FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office investigation will be dismissed.
DOJ-OGR-00000012.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (dated Sept 17, 2024) arguing that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was legally limited only to the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) and not binding on other federal districts. It cites the US Attorney's Manual and the specific text of the NPA authorized by R. Alexander Acosta to support the claim that the agreement contained limiting language regarding its scope. The text emphasizes that the negotiation history does not support an inference that the agreement was intended to apply nationwide.
DOJ-OGR-00020808.jpg
This document is a signature page for an addendum to a Non-Prosecution Agreement concerning Jeffrey Epstein. It confirms Epstein's understanding and agreement to the terms. The document is signed on October 29, 2007, by Lilly Ann Sanchez, an attorney for Epstein, and on October 30, 2007, by a representative for the U.S. Attorney's office.
DOJ-OGR-00020807.jpg
This document is a signature page for an Addendum to Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It contains a statement certifying that Epstein understands the clarifications to the NPA and agrees to comply. The document is signed by Gerald Lefcourt (Epstein's counsel) on October 29, 2007, and by a representative of the U.S. Attorney's Office (marked FAUSA) on October 30, 2007.
DOJ-OGR-00020804.jpg
This document is the signature page (Page 7 of 7) of a Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a statement certifying Epstein understands and agrees to the conditions. While signature blocks exist for Epstein, R. Alexander Acosta, A. Marie Villafaña, and Gerald Lefcourt, only Lilly Ann Sanchez (Attorney for Epstein) has signed and dated the document (9-24-07).
DOJ-OGR-00020803.jpg
This document is the signature page of a Non-Prosecution Agreement, dated September 24, 2007. It is signed by Gerald Lefcourt on behalf of his client, Jeffrey Epstein, and confirms Epstein's understanding and agreement to the terms. The agreement is with the U.S. Attorney's office, represented by R. Alexander Acosta and A. Marie Villafana.
DOJ-OGR-00020802.jpg
This document is the signature page of a Non-Prosecution Agreement, dated September 24, 2007. It is signed by Jeffrey Epstein and Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie Villafaña, on behalf of U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, and also lists Epstein's attorneys, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez. By signing, Epstein affirms that he has read, understood, and agrees to comply with the conditions of the agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00020797.jpg
This page is part of a legal agreement detailing the terms under which the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, R. Alexander Acosta, agrees to defer federal prosecution of Epstein. The deferral is in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida, contingent upon Epstein's compliance with the agreement's conditions. The document also outlines the procedure for initiating federal prosecution, including a notice period, should Epstein violate the terms.
DOJ-OGR-00002535.jpg
This document is an executive summary of a Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) investigation into the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAO) in 2007-2008. It outlines the factual background, starting with the 2005 Palm Beach Police Department investigation, the subsequent state indictment, and the referral to federal authorities. The summary details how the federal investigation led to a controversial non-prosecution agreement (NPA) signed on September 24, 2007, and notes that the OPR also investigated whether prosecutors committed misconduct by failing to consult with or misleading victims.
DOJ-OGR-00021858.jpg
This page from a legal filing (stamped 2024 but discussing historical legal arguments) analyzes the scope of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It argues that the NPA and the actions of the USAO-SDFL (under R. Alexander Acosta) were limited to the Southern District of Florida and were not intended to bind other federal districts, citing the United States Attorney's Manual. A footnote quotes the specific language of the NPA where federal prosecution is deferred in favor of state prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00021805.jpg
This page from a legal filing argues that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Epstein was strictly limited in scope to the Southern District of Florida. It cites the agreement's text, the negotiation history, and the U.S. Attorney's Manual to support the claim that the NPA was not intended to bind other districts from prosecuting Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00021678.jpg
This legal document argues that Ghislaine Maxwell cannot enforce the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) made with Jeffrey Epstein. The reasoning is twofold: first, Maxwell was not named as an intended third-party beneficiary of the agreement, and second, the NPA's terms are explicitly limited to prosecutions brought by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL) within that specific district, and therefore do not bar the current charges against her.
DOJ-OGR-00021520.jpg
This document is a signature page for an Addendum to Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It certifies that Epstein understands and agrees to comply with clarifications made to the NPA. The document is signed by Epstein's attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez on October 29, 2007, and by a First Assistant U.S. Attorney (FAUSA) on behalf of A. Marie Villafaña on October 30, 2007.
DOJ-OGR-00021519.jpg
This document is a signature page for an Addendum to Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. It certifies that Epstein understands and agrees to comply with clarifications to the agreement. The document is signed by Gerald Lefcourt (Epstein's counsel) on October 29, 2007, and by Jeffrey H. Sloman (FAUSA, signing for A. Marie Villafaña) on October 30, 2007.
DOJ-OGR-00021518.jpg
This document is a signature page for an addendum to a Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. It was signed by Jeffrey Epstein on October 29, 2007, and by the U.S. Attorney's office on October 30, 2007. The document certifies that Epstein has read, understood, and agrees to comply with the clarifications in the agreement, and also lists his legal counsel, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez.
DOJ-OGR-00021513.jpg
This document is the signature page (Page 7 of 7) of a Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. While signature lines exist for Epstein, R. Alexander Acosta, A. Marie Villafaña, and Gerald Lefcourt, the only visible signature and date (9-24-07) belong to Lilly Ann Sanchez, an attorney for Epstein. The text certifies that Epstein has read, understood, and agreed to comply with the conditions of the agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00021512.jpg
This document is the signature page (Page 7 of 7) of a Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein, dated September 2007. It contains the signatures of Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie Villafaña and Epstein's counsel, Gerald Lefcourt, certifying the agreement terms. The document also lists R. Alexander Acosta as U.S. Attorney and Lilly Ann Sanchez as additional defense counsel.
Statement regarding the case
Fragmented text discussing crimes, victims speaking out, disagreements about the case, and trial availability.
Unknown
Fragment of a closing statement regarding a case assessment and trial availability.
Defense of prosecutorial judgments
Acosta defends the decisions made during the Epstein case, noting that critics did not have access to the evidence available at the time.
Hearing attendance
Advising him of the hearing and asking if he would voluntarily attend.
No Subject
"To whom it may concern"
Public statement on the Epstein case (implied)
A letter from Acosta, published in The Daily Beast, where he explained the federal responsibility was to serve as a 'backstop' to state authorities.
No Subject
A letter from R. Alexander Acosta, published online in The Daily Beast, is cited in footnote 60.
N/A
referenced in footnote 247
N/A
Discusses the 'year-long assault on the prosecution and the prosecutors' by Epstein.
Telephone conference (Alternative)
Alternative proposed call time at 5:00 p.m.
Telephone conference
Proposed call at 5:00 p.m. to discuss details.
Breakfast Meeting
Meeting between U.S. Attorney Acosta and defense counsel regarding the case resolution.
Jeffrey Epstein
This document is a letter rejecting a proposal from Epstein's counsel, clarifying the U.S. Attorney's Office's position on a minimum two-year sentence, federal vs. state prosecution, and the limits of plea negotiations after an indictment.
Jeffrey Epstein
This document is a letter rejecting a proposal from Epstein's counsel, clarifying the U.S. Attorney's Office's position on a minimum two-year sentence, federal vs. state prosecution, and the limits of plea negotiations after an indictment.
Follow up to meeting
A follow-up call after the July 31 meeting where Acosta clarified that a plea to two federal misdemeanors was never an official offer.
Follow up to meeting
A follow-up call after the July 31 meeting where Acosta clarified that a plea to two federal misdemeanors was never an official offer.
Plea agreement oversight
Supervisory oversight and meetings during the nine-month period between signing the NPA and Epstein's guilty plea entry.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity