This document is page 212 from a book authored by James Patterson, likely 'Filthy Rich', which has been included in House Oversight Committee records (Bates stamp 010552). It features a statement signed by former U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta defending the prosecutorial decisions made in the Epstein case, arguing that critics were not privy to the specific evidence and trial assessments made at the time.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| R. Alexander Acosta | Former U.S. Attorney |
Signatory of the statement defending prosecutorial judgments in the Epstein case.
|
| James Patterson | Author |
Name appearing in the header, indicating this is likely a page from his book (e.g., 'Filthy Rich').
|
| Victims | Witnesses/Survivors |
Mentioned as having come forward to speak out.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District of Florida |
Jurisdiction where Acosta served as U.S. Attorney.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010552'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction mentioned in signature block.
|
"Some may disagree with prosecutorial judgments made in this case, but those individuals are not the ones who at the time reviewed the evidence available for trial and assessed the likelihood of success."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (422 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document