Won S. Shin
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Co counsel |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Professional supervisory |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Subordinate supervisor |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-29 | N/A | Filing of Document 79 (Certificate of Compliance). | Court | View |
| 2023-06-29 | N/A | Submission of legal filing concluding that the judgment of conviction should be affirmed. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-04-16 | Legal filing | Filing of a Notice of Appearance for Additional Counsel by Alison Moe in the case of United State... | Southern District of New York | View |
20250117133905126_22-1426.pdf
This document is a formal legal opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirming the conviction and 240-month prison sentence of Ghislaine Maxwell for sex trafficking and related offenses. The court rejected Maxwell's appeal on five grounds, including arguments regarding a non-prosecution agreement, statute of limitations, juror misconduct, jury instructions, and sentencing reasonableness. The document also includes a subsequent order from November 2024 denying Maxwell's petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc.
DOJ-OGR-00000065.tif
This document is an excerpt from a legal opinion affirming the District Court's June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction for 'Maxwell' (presumably Ghislaine Maxwell). It addresses five appellate questions, including whether Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement barred Maxwell's prosecution and if her sentence was procedurally reasonable. The document also lists the attorneys involved for both the Appellee (United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York) and the Defendant-Appellant.
DOJ-OGR-00014853.jpg
This document is Page 3 of a legal opinion (likely from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals) regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal of her 2022 conviction. It lists the legal counsel for both the government (Appellee) and Maxwell (Defendant-Appellant). The text, authored by Circuit Judge José A. Cabranes, summarizes Maxwell's conviction for sex trafficking and conspiracy related to minors, as well as her sentencing of concurrent prison terms.
DOJ-OGR-00001372.jpg
This legal document is a Notice of Appearance filed on April 16, 2021, in the case of United States v. Maxwell (Docket No. 21-58(L), 21-770(CON)). Attorney Alison Moe of the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York is formally entering her appearance as additional co-counsel for the United States of America, joining Won S. Shin.
DOJ-OGR-00000903.jpg
This is a Notice of Appearance filed on March 30, 2021, in the case of United States v. Maxwell (Docket No. 21-770). Lara Pomerantz of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York is entering the case as additional counsel, joining co-counsel Won S. Shin, on behalf of the United States (Appellee). The document certifies her admission to the court and provides her contact information.
DOJ-OGR-00000902.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on March 30, 2021, in the case of United States v. Maxwell (Docket No. 21-770). Maurene Comey of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York is entering her appearance as additional counsel for the United States (Appellee), serving as co-counsel alongside Won S. Shin.
DOJ-OGR-00000004.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing dated September 17, 2024, concerning the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell. It identifies the legal counsel for both the prosecution (Appellee) and the defense (Appellant), and summarizes that Maxwell is appealing her June 29, 2022, conviction and sentencing by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on charges including conspiracy and sex trafficking of a minor.
DOJ-OGR-00020598.jpg
This is a Notice of Appearance filed on July 28, 2022, in the case United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket No. 22-1426). Lara Pomerantz of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York is entering the case as additional counsel, serving as co-counsel alongside Won S. Shin for the Appellee (USA). The document certifies her admission to the court renewed on December 3, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00021880.jpg
This legal document is a court filing dated December 2, 2024, concerning the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction. It identifies the legal counsel for both the appellant, Maxwell, and the appellee, the United States, and states that Maxwell is appealing her June 29, 2022, conviction and sentence from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for charges including conspiracy and sex trafficking of a minor.
DOJ-OGR-00021850.jpg
This document is page 3 of a court filing (Case 22-1426) dated September 17, 2024, detailing the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction. Written by Circuit Judge José A. Cabranes, it lists the legal counsel for both sides and summarizes Maxwell's June 29, 2022, conviction for sex trafficking and conspiracy, including her sentencing of concurrent prison terms totaling 240 months (20 years).
DOJ-OGR-00021797.jpg
This document is Page 3 of a legal filing (Case 22-1426) dated September 17, 2024. It lists the legal counsel for both the United States (Appellee) and Ghislaine Maxwell (Appellant) and begins the written opinion by Circuit Judge José A. Cabranes regarding Maxwell's appeal of her 2022 conviction for sex trafficking and conspiracy involving minors. The text details her conviction statutes and sentences of 60, 120, and 240 months imprisonment.
DOJ-OGR-00021740.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Compliance filed on June 29, 2023, for Case 22-1426. Assistant U.S. Attorney Won S. Shin certifies on behalf of U.S. Attorney Damian Williams that the associated legal brief complies with a court order from April 28, 2023, and contains 19,291 words.
DOJ-OGR-00021739.jpg
This document is the conclusion page (Page 92 of 93) of a legal filing (Case 22-1426) dated June 29, 2023. It is submitted by US Attorney Damian Williams and Assistant US Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Won S. Shin of the Southern District of New York, formally requesting that a judgment of conviction be affirmed.
DOJ-OGR-00019280.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on September 10, 2020, in the case of United States v. Maxwell (Docket Case 20-3061). Maurene Comey of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York formally enters the case as additional counsel for the Appellee (United States), working alongside co-counsel Won S. Shin.
DOJ-OGR-00019829.jpg
This document is a Motion Information Statement filed on April 1, 2021, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case 21-770/21-58). Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by attorney David Oscar Markus, is appealing a decision by Judge Alison J. Nathan of the Southern District of New York, requesting reasonable bail or an evidentiary hearing. The motion is opposed by the United States of America, represented by AUSA Won S. Shin.
DOJ-OGR-00019821.jpg
A Notice of Appearance form filed on March 30, 2021, for Case 21-58 (Docket No. 21-770), United States v. Maxwell. Lara Pomerantz of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York is formally entering the case as additional counsel for the Appellee (United States of America), serving alongside co-counsel Won S. Shin.
DOJ-OGR-00019737.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on January 12, 2021, in the case of United States v. Maxwell (Docket No. 21-58). Attorney Lara Pomerantz of the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York is entering the case as additional counsel (co-counsel) alongside Won S. Shin representing the United States (Appellee).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity