DOJ-OGR-00000065.tif

39 KB

Extraction Summary

11
People
3
Organizations
3
Locations
3
Events
11
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document / court opinion
File Size: 39 KB
Summary

This document is an excerpt from a legal opinion affirming the District Court's June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction for 'Maxwell' (presumably Ghislaine Maxwell). It addresses five appellate questions, including whether Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement barred Maxwell's prosecution and if her sentence was procedurally reasonable. The document also lists the attorneys involved for both the Appellee (United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York) and the Defendant-Appellant.

People (11)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey Epstein Subject of Non-Prosecution Agreement
Non-Prosecution Agreement with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida
Maxwell Defendant/Appellant
Prosecution by US Attorney's Office, Rule 33 motion, Sixth Amendment rights, sentence. Referred to as 'She' in the fi...
Andrew Rohrbach Assistant United States Attorney
Representing the Appellee
Maurene Comey Assistant United States Attorney
On the brief for the Appellee
Alison Moe Assistant United States Attorney
On the brief for the Appellee
Lara Pomerantz Assistant United States Attorney
On the brief for the Appellee
Won S. Shin Assistant United States Attorney
On the brief for the Appellee
Damian Williams United States Attorney
For the Southern District of New York, Appellee
Diana Fabi Samson Attorney
On the brief for Defendant-Appellant
Arthur L. Aidala Attorney
On the brief for Defendant-Appellant
John M. Leventhal Attorney
On the brief for Defendant-Appellant

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida
Party to Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York
Prosecuting body for Maxwell; represented by Damian Williams
Aidala Bertuna & Kamins PC
Law firm representing the Defendant-Appellant

Timeline (3 events)

Maxwell's sentencing to concurrent terms of imprisonment (60, 120, 240 months) followed by supervised release.
June 29, 2022
Date of the District Court's judgment of conviction for Maxwell, which was affirmed
March 29, 2021
Date of a second superseding indictment against Maxwell

Locations (3)

Location Context
Location of United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York and Aidala Bertuna & Kamins PC
Jurisdiction related to Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement
Jurisdiction for Maxwell's prosecution and appeal

Relationships (11)

Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida
Maxwell Co-defendant/related case Jeffrey Epstein
The appeal questions whether Epstein's N-P-A barred Maxwell's prosecution.
Maxwell's prosecution by the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York
Andrew Rohrbach Subordinate/Supervisor Damian Williams
Andrew Rohrbach, Assistant United States Attorney... for Damian Williams, United States Attorney
Maurene Comey Subordinate/Supervisor Damian Williams
Maurene Comey, Assistant United States Attorney... for Damian Williams, United States Attorney
Alison Moe Subordinate/Supervisor Damian Williams
Alison Moe, Assistant United States Attorney... for Damian Williams, United States Attorney
Lara Pomerantz Subordinate/Supervisor Damian Williams
Lara Pomerantz, Assistant United States Attorney... for Damian Williams, United States Attorney
Won S. Shin Subordinate/Supervisor Damian Williams
Won S. Shin, Assistant United States Attorney... for Damian Williams, United States Attorney
Diana Fabi Samson Attorney/Client Maxwell
Diana Fabi Samson... for Defendant-Appellant.
Arthur L. Aidala Attorney/Client Maxwell
Arthur L. Aidala... for Defendant-Appellant.
John M. Leventhal Attorney/Client Maxwell
John M. Leventhal... for Defendant-Appellant.

Key Quotes (1)

"Identifying no errors in the District Court's conduct of this complex case, we AFFIRM the District Court's June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000065.tif
Quote #1

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,641 characters)

2a
§ 2423(a); and sex trafficking of a minor in violation of
18 U.S.C. § 1591(a) and (b)(2). She was principally
sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment of 60
months, 120 months, and 240 months, respectively, to
be followed by concurrent terms of supervised release.
On appeal, the questions presented are whether
(1) Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement with
the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern
District of Florida barred Maxwell's prosecution by
the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern
District of New York; (2) a second superseding indict-
ment of March 29, 2021, complied with the statute of
limitations; (3) the District Court abused its discretion
in denying Maxwell's Rule 33 motion for a new trial
based on the claimed violation of her Sixth Amend-
ment right to a fair and impartial jury; (4) the District
Court's response to a jury note resulted in a construc-
tive amendment of, or prejudicial variance from, the
allegations in the second superseding indictment; and
(5) Maxwell's sentence was procedurally reasonable.
Identifying no errors in the District Court's conduct
of this complex case, we AFFIRM the District Court's
June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction.
ANDREW ROHRBACH, Assistant United States Attorney
(Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, Won S.
Shin, Assistant United States Attorneys, on the brief),
for Damian Williams, United States Attorney for the
Southern District of New York, New York, NY, for
Appellee.
DIANA FABI SAMSON (Arthur L. Aidala, John M.
Leventhal, on the brief), Aidala Bertuna & Kamins PC,
New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellant.
DOJ-OGR-00000065

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document