Extraction Summary

6
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
4
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal correspondence / court order
File Size: 106 KB
Summary

This document is a letter motion dated January 7, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz (Troutman Sanders LLP) to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It requests approval for an agreement where the Co-Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) accept service of a complaint by Anastasia Doe and receive an extension until February 17, 2020, to respond. The document includes a handwritten 'SO ORDERED' endorsement by Judge Nathan dated January 8, 2020.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Bennet J. Moskowitz Attorney
Author of the letter, representing the Defendants (Troutman Sanders LLP)
Alison J. Nathan Judge
Recipient of the letter, United States District Judge who signed the order
Anastasia Doe Plaintiff
Plaintiff in the lawsuit against the Epstein Estate
Darren K. Indyke Defendant / Co-Executor
Co-Executor of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
Richard D. Kahn Defendant / Co-Executor
Co-Executor of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
Jeffrey E. Epstein Deceased
Mentioned as the deceased whose estate is being sued

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Troutman Sanders LLP
Law firm representing the Defendants
United States District Court
Southern District of New York (implied by address and header)
Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
The entity being sued, represented by Indyke and Kahn

Timeline (2 events)

2019-12-30
Agreement reached between parties regarding service of complaint and extension of deadline.
New York (implied)
Plaintiff (Anastasia Doe) Defendants (Indyke & Kahn)
2020-01-08
Judge Nathan signs the order approving the agreement ('SO ORDERED').
United States Courthouse, New York
Hon. Alison J. Nathan

Locations (2)

Location Context
Address of Troutman Sanders LLP
40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007

Relationships (4)

Bennet J. Moskowitz Attorney-Client Darren K. Indyke
We represent Defendants Darren K. Indyke...
Bennet J. Moskowitz Attorney-Client Richard D. Kahn
We represent Defendants... Richard D. Kahn
Darren K. Indyke Executor of Estate Jeffrey E. Epstein
Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
Richard D. Kahn Executor of Estate Jeffrey E. Epstein
Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein

Key Quotes (3)

"we agreed to accept service of Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF #1) on Defendants' behalf"
Source
007.pdf
Quote #1
"Plaintiff consented to Defendants having through February 17, 2020 to answer, move or otherwise respond"
Source
007.pdf
Quote #2
"SO ORDERED"
Source
007.pdf
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,414 characters)

Case 1:19-cv-11869-MKV-DCF Document 7 Filed 01/08/20 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:19-cv-11869-AJN Document 6 Filed 01/07/20 Page 1 of 1
Troutman Sanders LLP
875 Third Avenue
New York, New York 10022
troutman.com
troutman
sanders
Bennet J. Moskowitz
bennet.moskowitz@troutman.com
January 7, 2020
ECF
Hon. Alison J. Nathan
Thurgood Marshall
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
[Stamp: SDNY DOCKETED JAN 08 2020]
Re: Anastasia Doe v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, 1:19-cv-11869-AJN
Dear Judge Nathan:
We represent Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, "Defendants") in the referenced action. We write to respectfully request the Court's approval of the parties' agreement described below.
On December 30, 2019, subject to the Court's approval: (1) we agreed to accept service of Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF #1) on Defendants' behalf; and (2) Plaintiff consented to Defendants having through February 17, 2020 to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. There have been no previous requests for adjournments or extensions of time in this action.
[Handwritten Annotation in Margin: SO ORDERED]
Respectfully submitted,
/s/Bennet J. Moskowitz
Bennet J. Moskowitz
SO ORDERED:
[Signature]
1/8/20
HON. ALISON J. NATHAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document