Event Details

This document is page 4 of Brad Edwards' opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's motion for summary judgment in a civil case (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). Edwards argues that Epstein's claims of wrongdoing against him are unsubstantiated and that Edwards had no involvement in the Scott Rothstein fraud. The text explicitly states Epstein is a 'serial molester of minors' (citing Virginia Roberts' statement) and references Epstein's guilty plea and agreement with the US Attorney's Office regarding payments to approximately 34 victims.

This document is page 40 of a legal filing summarizing Jeffrey Epstein's deposition testimony. It lists paragraphs 105 through 112, detailing specific questions where Epstein invoked his Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination. The questions specifically ask if he socialized with Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz, Mr. Mottola, David Copperfield, and Bill Richardson (Governor of NM) in the presence of females under the age of 18, as well as questions regarding sexual abuse of children and soliciting prostitution.

This document page (38) details legal maneuvers between Jeffrey Epstein and attorney Bradley Edwards. It establishes that the U.S. Attorney's Office cleared Edwards of involvement in Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme, identifying him instead as a victim. It further describes Epstein's failed attempt to file a Florida Bar complaint against Edwards and highlights Epstein's repeated invocation of the Fifth Amendment during a March 2010 deposition regarding his claims against Edwards.

This document, dated September 12, 2013, appears to be a legal filing or summary defending attorney Bradley Edwards against claims made by Jeffrey Epstein. The text refutes Epstein's allegations that Edwards was involved in a Ponzi scheme run by Scott Rothstein, noting that Epstein failed to provide evidence during deposition and instead invoked attorney-client privilege. It also details that Edwards represents three victims (L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe) in civil suits against Epstein for sexual abuse.

This document is page 2 of Bradley Edwards' opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's motion for summary judgment in a civil case. It argues that Epstein's lawsuit against Edwards was a bad-faith intimidation tactic designed to drain resources and deter legitimate claims, asserting that Epstein knew he had actually molested Edwards' clients and had no intention of waiving his Fifth Amendment rights to allow for proper discovery. The footnotes list various evidentiary exhibits, including depositions of Epstein (2012), Edwards (2010), and Scott Rothstein (2012), as well as a transcript of a telephone interview with Virginia Roberts.

This document is page 39 of a House Oversight report detailing a deposition where Jeffrey Epstein repeatedly invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. The questions Epstein refused to answer concern his personal relationship with Bill Clinton, allegations of fabricated claims by attorney Mr. Edwards, the destruction of evidence in his garbage, sexual assaults on private planes, and the contents of his flight logs regarding celebrities and dignitaries.

This document is a page from a legal filing (stamped House Oversight) listing specific instances where Jeffrey Epstein invoked his Fifth Amendment rights during a deposition. He refused to answer questions regarding his personal relationship with Bill Clinton, potential fabricated claims by attorney Mr. Edwards, the value of claims by victims E.W., L.M., and Jane Doe, the destruction of evidence ('garbage'), sexual assaults on private planes, and the contents of flight logs involving celebrities.

This document is page 2 of a legal declaration signed by attorney Sigrid McCawley on October 21, 2016. It lists sealed exhibits 5 through 11 submitted to the court, which include deposition excerpts of Jeffrey Epstein, Tony Figuerora, and two redacted individuals, as well as banking records and nude photographs. The document appears to be part of the discovery or evidence submission process in civil litigation involving Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.

This is a 'Statement of Undisputed Facts' filed by Defendant Bradley J. Edwards in a civil case brought by Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach County, Florida (Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG). The document asserts that Epstein has a sexual preference for young children, citing a deposition from March 17, 2010, where Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment. A footnote argues that Edwards is entitled to an adverse inference regarding Epstein's silence.

This document serves as an exhibit in a 2019 court case, containing an excerpt from a Vanity Fair article discussing Jeffrey Epstein's departure from Bear Stearns. It details a 'Reg D' violation involving a $20,000 loan to his friend Warren Eisenstein, a subsequent $2,500 fine, and S.E.C. questioning regarding rumors of insider trading (St. Joe Minerals) and an illicit affair with a secretary.

This document is a 'Statement of Undisputed Facts' filed by defendant Bradley J. Edwards in a civil case brought by Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach County, Florida (Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG). The filing asserts as Fact #1 that Epstein has a 'sexual preference for young children,' citing a deposition from March 17, 2010. A footnote details that during this deposition, Epstein invoked his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent regarding this subject, which Edwards argues allows for an adverse inference against Epstein.

This page of a legal filing details a specific sexual incident involving Jeffrey Epstein and a victim identified as 'S.G.', including graphic descriptions of Epstein's body. The document asserts that while 'Edwards' believes the victim count exceeds forty, evidence suggests the number of underage girls molested is in the hundreds. It also references Epstein invoking the 5th Amendment during a 2010 deposition and discusses negotiations between Epstein's legal team and the U.S. Attorney's Office to avoid federal felony charges.

This legal document outlines legal conflicts between Jeffrey Epstein and attorney Bradley Edwards in 2010. It confirms that Edwards was officially designated a victim of the Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme by the U.S. Attorney's Office, and that a Florida Bar complaint filed by Epstein against Edwards regarding Rothstein was dismissed. The document also details Epstein's March 17, 2010 deposition where he repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment when asked about his specific allegations against Edwards and about individuals in California Edwards sought to depose.

This page from a legal filing documents the depositions of Jeffrey Epstein and three of his alleged co-conspirators (Sarah Kellen, Nadia Marcinkova, and Adriana Mucinska Ross) in March and April 2010. It details that while attorney Edwards attempted to question them regarding the procurement of young girls, the co-conspirators invoked their Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination. Notably, the document identifies Bruce Reinhart as the attorney representing Sarah Kellen during her deposition.