Date Unknown
A trip to New Mexico involving Jane.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| JANE | person | 1277 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00008945.jpg
This legal document is a motion arguing for the convictions of Ms. Maxwell on Counts One, Three, and Four to be vacated. The defense contends that the jury was improperly influenced by evidence of conduct in New Mexico involving a person named 'Jane', which was not part of the original indictment. This created a 'constructive amendment' or a prejudicial 'variance' between the indictment and the proof at trial, warranting a new trial on these counts.
Events with shared participants
Maxwell taught Jane how to massage Epstein, which led to the abuse.
Date unknown
A meeting involving the witness (Jane) and Epstein.
1994-01-01 • Unknown
Filing of the court transcript regarding sentencing calculations.
2022-08-22 • Court (Southern District)
Trip to New York to see The Lion King
Date unknown • New York
Jane's trip to Epstein's ranch in New Mexico, which she testified occurred when she was '15 or 16'.
Date unknown • Epstein's ranch in New Mexico
A trip taken by Jane to New Mexico, allegedly for the purpose of engaging in sexual activity.
Date unknown • New Mexico
A return trip taken by Jane from New Mexico, during which Mr. Epstein was not present.
Date unknown • New Mexico
A trial where the Government presented evidence, including Jane's testimony, and the jury was instructed by the District Court.
Date unknown • District Court
A trial where the Defendant is arguing she suffered prejudice due to a delay in prosecution.
Date unknown
Flight out of New Mexico
Date unknown • New Mexico
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event