Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
A proposed hearing where the Court can question Juror 50 to assess his credibility.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juror 50 | person | 685 | View Entity |
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009817.jpg
This legal document argues against a defendant's claim that Juror 50 intentionally lied on a juror questionnaire about being a victim of sexual abuse in order to serve on the jury. The filing contends that Juror 50's other disclosures, such as his knowledge of the defendant's connection to Epstein, are inconsistent with an intent to deceive. It cites legal precedents to support the idea that juror questionnaires should be viewed in context and suggests the matter of credibility should be resolved in a formal court hearing.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
Date referenced regarding Juror 50's testimony/disclosure status
2021-11-04 • N/A
Juror 50 commented on Annie Farmer's Twitter post
2022-01-01 • Twitter
The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.
Date unknown
A potential juror (ID 50) answers a questionnaire to determine their suitability to serve on a jury.
Date unknown
Date the second sharing order was signed according to email recollection.
2020-02-04 • New York
A Post-Verdict Hearing where Juror 50 allegedly lied to the Court.
Date unknown • The Court
Evaluation of Maxwell's appeal of a Protective Order.
Date unknown
Voir Dire process where Juror 50 allegedly concealed material information and gave false answers.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event