Event Details

Date Unknown

Description

Signing of the NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement)

Participants (4)

Name Type Mentions
Mr. Epstein (implied) person 0 View Entity
Epstein's defense person 0 View Entity
Acosta person 475 View Entity
USAO organization 691 View Entity

Source Documents (3)

DOJ-OGR-00021365.jpg

Unknown type • 1.1 MB
View

This document, an OPR report, analyzes prosecutor Villafaña's conduct during the federal investigation and prosecution of Epstein, refuting a public narrative that she colluded with defense counsel. The report concludes that Villafaña consistently advocated for prosecuting Epstein, worked to protect victims' anonymity, and cared deeply about them, despite some criticisms of her interactions. It examines email exchanges and supervisor statements to provide context for her actions and explanations.

DOJ-OGR-00021374.jpg

Government Report (likely Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility - OPR) • 1.07 MB
View

This document is a page from an OPR report analyzing U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. It criticizes the reliance on state procedures for the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), noting that the specific state charges selected allowed Epstein to avoid sex offender registration in New Mexico due to age-of-consent laws. It also details that Acosta was aware the Palm Beach Police Department distrusted the State Attorney's Office, yet he proceeded with a plea deal that relied heavily on state authorities.

DOJ-OGR-00021389.jpg

Government Report (OPR Report) • 839 KB
View

This document is page 189 of a Department of Justice OPR report (Chapter Three) reviewing the government's interaction with victims in the Epstein case. It outlines the factual background of victim rights legislation, specifically the history leading to the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) of 2004, and sets the context for analyzing the USAO and FBI's communications with victims surrounding the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The text details various legislative acts from 1982 to 2004 aimed at protecting crime victims.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

A 'massage' involving the witness. The questioning on this page focuses on the events that occurred after this massage.

Date unknown • Unspecified

View

September agreement

2007-09-01 • Unknown

View

A witness was driven to Mr. Epstein's house. During the drive, the female driver advised the witness about the potential encounter with Mr. Epstein.

Date unknown • In a vehicle en route to Mr. Epstein's house

View

Federal prosecution of Epstein

2006-01-01 • N/A

View

Removal of evidence (hard drives, cameras) prior to police search.

Date unknown • Epstein's House

View

Federal prosecution of Epstein led by Acosta.

2006-01-01 • USA

View

Deadline set by Acosta for prosecutors not to issue victim notification letters (5 p.m. Friday).

2007-12-07

View

Private meeting between Acosta and Lefkowitz at a Marriott hotel in West Palm Beach regarding keeping the deal secret.

Date unknown • Marriott hotel, West Palm Beach

View

Epstein's attorneys challenged the USAO's position regarding victim notification.

2007-12-01 • N/A

View

Acosta made final edits to the Non-Prosecution Agreement, removing language that required actions from the State Attorney's Office and state court, and sent them to Villafaña.

2007-09-24

View

Event Metadata

Type
Agreement signing
Location
Unknown
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
4
Source Documents
3
Extracted
2025-11-20 14:33

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00021365.jpg
Date String
N/A

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event