Sloman
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Communicated negotiated |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Collaborated on document |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Purported relationship indirect |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Communicated concerns |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Communicated information |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Communicated copied on email |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Staff supervisor |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Collaborators |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Discussed facts with |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Black
|
Correspondent |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Dershowitz
|
Acquaintance |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Communicated |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Negotiating party communication recipient |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Roth
|
Correspondence |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Subject of negotiations |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Urged |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Recipient of copy of response to |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Collaborated on victim notification draft |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Directed communication |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Informed by informs |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
OPR
|
Communicated interview statement |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Communicated email instruction |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Communicated email |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Sanchez
|
Communicated letter |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Discussion and agreement on the addendum's terms after a draft was sent and a phone call occurred. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Federal investigation resolved through a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sloman briefly left the USAO and entered private practice specializing in plaintiffs' sexual abus... | Miami | View |
| N/A | N/A | Menchel made substantive changes to Villafaña's draft letter concerning Epstein's plea deal, incl... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Early meeting with Acosta, Sloman, and Menchel where Villafaña raised victim consultation issue a... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | John Roth handled Starr's letter and reviewed materials related to the Epstein matter, limiting h... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defense counsel arguing against victim notification letters | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sloman met with Dershowitz and informed him of USAO's opposition to early termination and transfe... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Prosecution of Epstein | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Victim notification process regarding Epstein's case. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trial considerations for Epstein case, including victim trauma and evidentiary challenges | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | OPR interviews regarding Epstein's case and sentencing discussions. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Acosta anticipated leaving USAO and considered employment with Kirkland & Ellis, leading him to r... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The defense team rejected Acosta's December 19, 2007, NPA modification letter. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | OPR Interviews conducting a retrospective review of the case handling. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | OPR Interviews with prosecutors involved in the Epstein case. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Internal USAO discussions regarding the viability of federal prosecution vs. a negotiated plea deal. | USAO | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussions regarding the two-year plea deal resolution. | USAO (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Villafaña reports Epstein is at the Stockade instead of Main Detention Center. | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | Legal dispute | Dispute between the prosecution (Sloman) and defense (Starr, Lefkowitz) over the notification of ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | OPR questioned Lourie, Menchel, Sloman, and Acosta about the timeline for reviewing a prosecution... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Interview | OPR conducted interviews with Acosta, Lourie, Menchel, Sloman, and Villafaña about the origins of... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Meeting | A meeting to discuss how to proceed with the Epstein case, where the FBI insisted on lifetime sex... | USAO in Miami | View |
| N/A | Conversation | Sloman told Villafaña that pre-charge resolutions do not require victim notification. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal process | Discussions regarding whether to contact victims about the potential resolution of the case befor... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00023132.jpg
This page from a DOJ OPR report details the delays in Jeffrey Epstein's guilty plea following the signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It describes legal maneuvering by Epstein's defense team, including Kenneth Starr calling senior DOJ official Alice Fisher, and disagreements between the USAO and defense regarding the timeline for the plea entry, which was eventually set for January 4, 2008. The document also highlights internal communications regarding Epstein's failure to use 'best efforts' to comply with the NPA timeline.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019230.jpg
This document is page 7 of a letter addressed to Honorable Mark Filip, dated May 19, 2008. It details allegations that Assistant U.S. Attorney David Weinstein leaked confidential information regarding the Epstein case and plea negotiations to New York Times reporter Landon Thomas. The text criticizes the U.S. Attorney's Office, specifically First Assistant Sloman and U.S. Attorney Acosta, for their handling of these leaks and the subsequent internal review.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019229.jpg
This document is page 6 of a letter to the Honorable Mark Filip, dated May 19, 2008, detailing complaints about the conduct of federal prosecutors in the Jeffrey Epstein case. The text alleges that prosecutors made unprecedented financial demands, including a requirement for Epstein to pay $150,000 to alleged victims (most of whom were later found to be adults, not minors) and to fund a specific civil attorney chosen by the prosecution. It further alleges a conflict of interest where an Assistant U.S. Attorney recommended a civil lawyer connected to their boyfriend, and notes that First Assistant Sloman's former law partner, Mr. Herman, began filing civil suits against Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023129.jpg
This document, part of a House Oversight collection, contains text from a news report analyzing the fallout of the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement. It features quotes from prosecutor Sloman admitting terms should have been harsher but denying corruption, and details former US Attorney Acosta's 2011 defense of the deal against Epstein's 'army of legal superstars.' The text also highlights the victims' lawsuit against the government for sealing the deal and includes criticism from law professor Marci Hamilton regarding the failure to charge co-conspirators.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013084.jpg
This document is page 168 of an academic text titled 'General Intelligence in the Everyday Human World'. It discusses theoretical concepts of 'naive physics', specifically focusing on events, processes, causality, states of matter, and surfaces. It cites researchers Gibson and Sloman. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013084' stamp, indicating it was produced as part of a House Oversight Committee investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013014.jpg
This document presents a high-level architecture of a human-like mind (Figure 5.1), detailing subsystems for perception, action, memory, and processing. The text discusses the rationale behind the architectural choices, comparing them to Sloman's diagram and the LIDA architecture, while explaining modifications such as the explicit inclusion of language and reinforcement components.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025358.jpg
This document is page 6 of a letter to the Honorable Mark Filip, dated May 19, 2008, likely from Jeffrey Epstein's legal defense team. It outlines complaints against federal prosecutors, alleging they made unprecedented financial demands ($150,000 per alleged victim), attempted to control the selection of civil attorneys for the victims, and engaged in conflicts of interest involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney. The text also highlights a connection between a civil attorney suing Epstein (Mr. Herman) and a First Assistant prosecutor (Sloman), noting they were former law partners.
Recusal instruction
Instructed Sloman to stop copying him on emails relating to the Epstein matter due to conflict of interest.
Non-prosecution provision for co-conspirators
Sloman, who was not involved in negotiations, told OPR that in retrospect he understood the provision was designed to protect Epstein's four assistants.
Evidence Review
Notified that Robert Senior would review evidence de novo
No Subject
A letter was sent to Roy Black, which was signed by Sloman. This is mentioned in connection with the 'AUSA position'.
No Subject
Menchel rebukes Sloman for the tone and substance of a prior email, stating Sloman acted without authorization by preparing an indictment memo for the Epstein case. Menchel clarifies that his conversation with Lilly Sanchez was an informal discussion, not a plea offer, and was done with the US Attorney's knowledge.
Conversation with Lilly Ann Sanchez
Sloman's contemporaneous email recounting his conversation with Sanchez about the Epstein case.
Revised addendum portion
Shortly after the breakfast meeting, Sloman emailed Lefkowitz (copying Acosta and Villafaña) mentioning a phone call with 'Alex' and offering a revised portion of the NPA addendum.
Rejection of suggested revision
Sloman clarified to Villafaña that 'Jay’s suggested revision has been rejected.'
NPA addendum
Sloman noted in an email that he had 'just got off the phone with Alex' before offering a revised addendum.
Plea Deal Decision
Sloman discussed how the two-year plea offer was reached and the roles of Acosta, Menchel, and Lourie.
Witness challenges
Described unreliable witnesses and those who 'loved' Epstein.
Victim notification
Sloman explained to OPR the concern that notifying victims about a potential $150,000 payment could compromise their testimony.
Addendum revision
Sent a revision to the Addendum language.
Instruction regarding victim contact
Villafaña recalled Sloman responding to her email by telephone, stating, "[Y]ou can’t do that now."
Handling of Epstein's NPA
Sloman described Acosta as process-oriented and believed the USAO gave Epstein 'too much process'.
Communication protocol and NPA deadline for Epstein case
Sloman sent a letter to Lefkowitz asking that all future communication be directed to Villafaña and reiterated that the USAO would terminate the NPA unless Epstein complied by June 2, 2008.
Transfer of supervision
Seeking USAO's agreement to transfer supervision of Epstein's community control phase to the U.S. Virgin Islands.
No Subject
Noting Villafaña's concern about Epstein and that defense team would abide by Sloman's decision.
Concerns regarding potential impeachment evidence
Discussed concern that notifying victims of damages rights would compromise cross-examination.
Re: Victim Notification
Good.
Victim Notification
Informed Sloman that PBPD Chief Reiter 'is going to notify victims about the plea.'
Victim Notification
Villafaña reported that Chief Reiter 'is going to notify victims about the plea'.
Consultation with Mandelker
Claimed Acosta consulted with Mandelker regarding deferring notification to the State Attorney.
Decision making process
Stated Acosta made decision with Mandelker.
History of negotiations and misconduct claims
Recounting history of negotiations culminating in NPA and addressing misconduct claims.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity