Nathan

Person
Mentions
108
Relationships
15
Events
4
Documents
52
Also known as:
Scott Nathan Nathan Kaplan Nathan Myrhvold Nathan Chambers

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
15 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person MAXWELL
Judicial
6
2
View
person Sharpe James
Interviewer subject
5
1
View
person JEFFREY
Professional
5
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Business associate
5
1
View
person DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON
Professional
5
1
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judicial
5
1
View
person MAXWELL
Judicial oversight
5
1
View
person narrator
Sibling
5
1
View
person Narrator
Family
5
1
View
organization ICA
Professional
5
1
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judge defendant
5
1
View
person Pritzker
Linked
1
1
View
person Assistant United States Attorney
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Claudia
Professional
1
1
View
organization SDNY
Judicial
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Tim Ferriss's challenge to Professor Zschau's class to contact high-profile celebrities. Princeton University (Implied) View
N/A N/A Drafting of Amicus brief for the Bakke case. Unknown View
2021-11-28 N/A Government submits letter motion to preclude cross-examination under seal in US v. Maxwell. Southern District of New York View
2005-01-25 Meeting Nathan has a lunch meeting that will last 1 hour and 30 minutes. N/A View

EFTA00032697.pdf

This document is an email dated April 14, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Nathan at NYSD Chambers regarding the case U.S. v. Maxwell (S2 20 Cr. 330). The email attaches a letter regarding a Marshall Order and a proposed order for the Marshal. It is copied to other defense attorneys including Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.

Email
2025-12-25

EFTA00032602.pdf

An email dated November 21, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Judge Nathan's chambers. The email serves as a cover letter for the submission of the Government's reply brief regarding Exhibit 52 (GX 52) in the case US v. Maxwell, noting it is submitted temporarily under seal. Defense attorneys Christian Everdell, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger are copied on the correspondence.

Email / legal correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00028203.pdf

This document is an email dated November 6, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Nathan at NYSD Chambers. The email concerns the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330) and submits a letter regarding 'Minor Victim-3' along with proposed redactions. Defense attorneys Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger are copied on the correspondence.

Email / legal correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00021980.pdf

This document is an email dated November 8, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to the chambers of Judge Nathan. The email submits a joint letter regarding prospective juror questionnaires for the case United States v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330).

Email
2025-12-25

EFTA00021875.pdf

This document is an email chain from August 2020 involving legal counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell (Jeff Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, etc.) and likely government prosecutors (names redacted). The discussion concerns a discovery letter sent by the defense, the handling of criminal grand jury materials in relation to Maxwell's civil cases, and a dispute over the disclosure of victim names. The redacted senders discuss strategy for responding to 'Jeff and Laura,' specifically refuting claims of government malfeasance and debating whether to allow materials to be filed under seal.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00018880.pdf

This document is an email dated November 4, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney to Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The email submits an unredacted request to charge (RTC) and verdict sheet, noting that redacted versions will be filed on the Electronic Court Filing (ECF) system and that the defense seeks to seal 'Exhibit A'. Defense attorneys Christian Everdell, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger are copied on the correspondence.

Legal email correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00016509.pdf

An email dated November 28, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the case US v. Maxwell. The email submits a motion to preclude cross-examination under seal and copies defense attorneys including Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger.

Email
2025-12-25

EFTA00001908.pdf

Two pages of handwritten notes on Jeffrey E. Epstein stationery. The left page appears to be a 'To Do' or status list regarding staff, medical, science (mentioning Harvard and Robots), and property maintenance in NY. The right page is a relationship or brainstorming map containing numerous high-profile names in technology, finance, and media, including Rupert Murdoch, Elon (Musk), Thiel (Peter), Zuckerman, Pritzker, and others, often connected by arrows or circled.

Handwritten notes / personal notepad
2025-12-25

DOJ-OGR-00022736.tif

This document is an index or concordance listing various words and names found within a larger document, along with their corresponding page and line numbers. It includes entries for individuals like Morgan, Ms, Nat, Nathan, and Nigel, as well as organizations like Mossad. The footer indicates the document is from "MAGNA LEGAL SERVICES" and has a DOJ-OGR number.

Index/concordance
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015056.jpg

This legal document is a court order denying defendant Maxwell's request for full access to the grand jury transcripts from her case. The court finds she has not demonstrated a particularized need for the materials, as required by law. However, the court has ordered the government to produce the transcripts for a private (in camera) review by July 28, 2025, after which the court may provide excerpts to Maxwell's counsel if deemed necessary.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001404.jpg

This is a legal notice from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 27, 2021, regarding the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Case 21-770). The document formally announces that the case manager assigned to the matter has been changed. It provides a phone number for any inquiries related to the case.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001310.jpg

This document is a 'Notice of Defective Filing' issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on April 5, 2021, regarding the case United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket 21-58). The notice indicates that a 'Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel' submitted by the United States (Appellee) did not comply with Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (FRAP) or Local Rules, though the specific reason is not checked in the visible list. The document lists Judge Debra Ann Livingston and Clerk Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe as court officials.

Court notice (notice of defective filing)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001301.jpg

This document is page 11 of a court filing (Case 4:17-cr-02949-MV) dated February 3, 2021. It argues for the pretrial release of a defendant named Mr. Robertson under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) to allow him to prepare for his trial scheduled for April 5, 2021. The text cites various legal precedents regarding temporary release for defense preparation. Note: While the user requested an 'Epstein-related' analysis, this specific page pertains to a 'Mr. Robertson' and does not contain direct text references to Jeffrey Epstein.

Court filing / legal order
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000906.jpg

This document is a 'Notice of Defective Filing' issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on April 1, 2021. It addresses a 'Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel' submitted on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, which failed to comply with court rules, specifically being 'Not Text-Searchable'. The notice lists various reasons for non-compliance with FRAP and Local Rules.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000904.jpg

This is a Notice of Defective Filing from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding United States of America v. Maxwell (Case 21-770). Dated April 1, 2021, it notifies the defense that a 'Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel' submitted on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell on March 30, 2021, did not comply with Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (FRAP) or Local Rules. The document lists various potential reasons for the defect, though no specific reason is visually checked on this page.

Legal notice (notice of defective filing)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000838.jpg

This is a Docketing Notice from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case United States of America v. Maxwell (Case 21-770), dated March 29, 2021. It notifies counsel that the appeal has been docketed and provides instructions regarding the Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, which must be returned within 14 days. The document references the lower court case (1:20-cr-330-1) presided over by Judge Nathan in the SDNY.

Legal document (docketing notice)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020595.jpg

This legal document, dated July 15, 2022, is a notice from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case of "United States of America v. Maxwell" (Docket # 22-1426). The notice states that the case manager assigned to the matter has been changed. It provides a phone number for any inquiries related to the case.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020486.jpg

This document is a formal "Notice of Record on Appeal Filed" from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated July 8, 2022. It confirms that the electronic index for the record on appeal has been filed in the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket # 22-1426). The notice is issued under the authority of Chief Judge Debra Ann Livingston and Clerk of Court Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020385.jpg

This document is a docketing notice from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding case 22-1426, United States of America v. Maxwell. It outlines procedures for appellate counsel and pro se parties to access necessary forms and information related to the case.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015467.jpg

This document contains four phone message slips addressed to 'Jeffrey' (Epstein) dated January 24 and 25, 2005. The messages involve scheduling coordination with 'Nathan' (via Claudia), a callback notice regarding 'Mitchel' (via Cecilia), a request to call back Jerry Goldsmith, and a redacted female caller asking if Jeffrey wants her to 'work today' at specific times (2pm or 9:45pm). The document is marked as a Government Exhibit for the S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) case.

Phone message logs
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021875.jpg

This document is a blank court form titled 'Verified Itemized Bill of Costs' from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated September 17, 2024. It relates to the appeal case 'United States of America v. Maxwell' (Docket #: 22-1426cr), referencing the original District Court case presided over by Judge Nathan in the SDNY. The form is intended for counsel to submit costs pursuant to FRAP 39(c), though the specific fields for amounts and signatures are unfilled in this copy.

Legal court form (verified itemized bill of costs)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021874.jpg

This document is a procedural instruction sheet from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the filing of a 'Bill of Costs' in the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket 22-1426cr). Dated September 17, 2024, it outlines the specific requirements under FRAP 39 for recovering costs, such as printing fees, following a judgment. The document lists Chief Judge Debra Ann Livingston and Clerk Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe.

Court document (bill of costs instructions)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021822.jpg

This document is a blank 'Verified Itemized Bill of Costs' form filed on September 17, 2024, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the case 'United States of America v. Maxwell' (Docket # 22-1426cr). The form is intended for a party to request the Clerk of Court to prepare an itemized statement of costs, such as docketing and printing fees, to be taxed against the opposing party.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021821.jpg

This document, issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on September 17, 2024, provides detailed instructions for filing a bill of costs in the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket # 22-1426cr). It outlines the procedural requirements under FRAP 39, including a 14-day filing deadline after judgment, verification, service on adversaries, and specific rules regarding allowable charges and documentation for printing costs.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021788.jpg

This document is a Revised Notice of Hearing Date from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket # 22-1426cr). The notice, dated February 29, 2024, schedules oral arguments for Tuesday, March 12, 2024, at 2:00 p.m. at the Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse in New York City, allotting 10 minutes per side for arguments.

Court notice (revised notice of hearing date)
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
2
As Recipient
0
Total
2

Amicus brief drafting

From: Nathan
To: Narrator

Asked narrator to help draft an Amicus brief for the Bakke case.

Request
N/A

N/A

From: Nathan
To: Sharpe James

Left a message; later discussed childhood education.

Call
N/A

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity