| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
U.S. Supreme Court
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Congress
|
Executive legislative conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Senate Intelligence Committee
|
Conflict over executive power |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1926-01-01 | N/A | The Supreme Court case Myers v. United States (272 U.S. 52) was litigated. The court struck down ... | United States | View |
| 1926-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case Myers v. United States, where the court struck down a statute limiting the Pre... | United States | View |
| 1920-09-24 | N/A | President Wilson, via the State Department, announced his refusal to enforce Section 34 of the Jo... | N/A | View |
| 1920-09-24 | N/A | The State Department announced President Wilson's refusal to carry out a section of the Jones Mer... | N/A | View |
This document is a legal analysis, likely from a government entity like the House Oversight Committee, detailing the constitutional basis for U.S. Presidents to refuse to enforce laws they deem unconstitutional, often through the use of presidential signing statements. It cites several opinions from the Office of Legal Counsel (O.L.C.) and provides historical examples from the administrations of Presidents Wilson and Eisenhower to support the executive's authority. This document is unrelated to Jeffrey Epstein and contains no information about him or any associated individuals, events, or entities.
This document is a legal memorandum, identified as 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012387', outlining the constitutional basis for a U.S. President to refuse to enforce a statute believed to be unconstitutional. It details the President's duty to defend executive power and uses the 1926 Supreme Court case Myers v. United States, involving President Wilson, as a key historical precedent. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity