Unnamed Client
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GERALD B. LEFCOURT
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Unnamed Attorney
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed speaker (attorney)
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GERALD B. LEFCOURT
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed speaker (attorney)
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Associational implied |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Herman
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
unnamed attorney
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Herman
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Berke
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Roy Black
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed defense attorney
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. FOY
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
GLORIA ALLRED
|
Client |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Jill Greenfield
|
Client |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged victim perpetrator |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Employee |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jordan Merson
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Isidro Garcia
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Mariann Wang
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim witness |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Threats | The speaker's client and people close to the client have received physical threats and death thre... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | An FBI investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, which a client of the speaker was cooperating with. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Lie detector test | The client passed a rigorous lie detector test conducted by a highly qualified expert. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | A client took a surreptitious photo of Olivia and hung it on his bare refrigerator. | Client's home (implied) | View |
| 2025-06-01 | Financial transaction | A transfer of several hundred thousand dollars was made from the client's account. | N/A | View |
| 2021-04-02 | N/A | Proposed meeting/interview with client regarding Epstein interactions | Unknown (likely USANYS offi... | View |
| 2019-10-23 | N/A | Victim Meeting | New York, NY | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | Meeting between SDNY, Mr. Kaiser, and his client regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. | 1 St. Andrew's Plaza, Manha... | View |
| 2008-01-18 | Legal retainer | A client retained the law firm Herman & Mermelstein PA to represent him and his minor daughter in... | N/A | View |
| 0020-07-01 | N/A | Trial Start Date | 40 Foley Square | View |
EFTA00038582.pdf
An email chain from April 1, 2021, in which attorney Mariann Wang informs the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) that her client is cancelling a scheduled meeting. The client wishes to forego another interview as she feels she has recounted her interactions with Jeffrey Epstein too many times and believes her information will not materially advance current prosecutions. The email is copied to attorney Gloria Allred.
EFTA00038462.pdf
An email chain from October 1, 2020, in which Maria Kelljchian, a paralegal at Edwards Pottinger LLC, contacts federal authorities regarding a client identified as a 'Florida victim' of Epstein currently living in Ohio. The email requests FBI assistance for the victim's therapy expenses and offers to coordinate a statement. The internal discussion among the recipients (likely law enforcement or prosecutors) involves coordinating interviews with victims represented by Brittany and Brad, and mentions an upcoming trip to Pennsylvania.
EFTA00032330.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2019 between attorney Gloria Allred and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). Allred informs the SDNY that she represents a new alleged victim of Jeffrey Epstein who wishes to attend a victim meeting run by the FBI in New York on October 23, 2019. The emails discuss logistical details, including travel arrangements coordinated by FBI victim services and scheduling a specific interview time for the client with the AUSA handling the case.
EFTA00031238.pdf
An email dated July 3, 2020, from attorney Jordan Merson to a redacted recipient (Mr. [Redacted]). Merson states that his client (implied to be an Epstein accuser based on the subject line and attached article) is ready to help with an unspecified matter, likely related to the investigation or prosecution following Ghislaine Maxwell's arrest. The email includes a link to a NY Post article about an accuser's reaction to the arrest.
EFTA00029675.pdf
This document is an email chain from February 2020 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York and Jill Greenfield, a UK partner at Fieldfisher LLP. The correspondence concerns the SDNY's request to interview Greenfield's client, who is believed to be a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and a former employee of Ghislaine Maxwell. The emails discuss interview logistics, including anonymity, the voluntary nature of the discussion, the composition of the interview team (prosecutors and FBI agents), and the creation of FBI Form 302 reports.
EFTA00028804.pdf
This document is an email dated October 18, 2019, from attorney Gloria Allred to redacted recipients. Allred states she represents a new client who is an alleged victim of Jeffrey Epstein. She indicates the client is willing to travel to New York for a 'victim meeting' scheduled for October 23 and requests a phone call to discuss the matter.
EFTA00028353.pdf
An email dated July 11, 2019, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to attorney Isidro Garcia. The email discusses the rights of Garcia's client (a victim) under the Crime Victims' Rights Act to be heard at Jeffrey Epstein's upcoming bail hearing, noting that the prosecution intends to vigorously oppose bail.
EFTA00026794.pdf
This document is an email chain from February 2020 between Jill Greenfield, a partner at the UK law firm Fieldfisher, and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York. They are negotiating the terms for an interview with Greenfield's client, a former employee of Ghislaine Maxwell and potential victim of Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence covers logistics, the client's request for anonymity, the presence of a US lawyer friend, and the U.S. government's assurance that the client is considered a witness/victim rather than a suspect. The U.S. Attorney explains the FBI interview process (Form 302) and offers to travel to London for the meeting.
EFTA00026685.pdf
This document is an email dated July 10, 2019, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney at the Southern District of New York (SDNY) to an attorney named Mr. Kaiser. The email arranges a meeting for July 12, 2019, at the SDNY offices at 1 St. Andrew's Plaza to interview Mr. Kaiser's female client in connection with the government's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein.
EFTA00024292.pdf
This document contains an email thread from October 2019 between attorney Gloria Allred and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). Allred informs the prosecutors of a new client who is an alleged victim of Jeffrey Epstein and is willing to travel to New York for a victim meeting scheduled for October 23, 2019. The Assistant US Attorney responds, confirming the meeting and requesting the client's personal details to allow FBI victim services to coordinate travel logistics.
EFTA00022201.pdf
This document is an email thread between an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York and Gary Bloxsome, a partner at Blackfords LLP in London, dating from July 28 to August 10, 2020. The correspondence details negotiations for a 'voluntary interview' (proffer) of Bloxsome's unnamed client regarding the client's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically focusing on communications and knowledge of sexual activity with women or girls. Key points of negotiation include the scope of immunity (SDNY offering limited use immunity versus the broader protections of an MLAT compelled interview) and the specific legal ramifications of providing false statements under 18 U.S.C. Section 1001.
EFTA00020774.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 2020 between Jill Greenfield of the law firm Fieldfisher and an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The correspondence concerns the scheduling of a call and the preparation for an interview with a client of Greenfield's who is a potential witness/victim in the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The SDNY attorney provides a specific list of seven question categories to guide Greenfield's discussion with her client, covering topics such as the client's background, recruitment, employment duties, travel, specific instances of sexual abuse by Epstein or Maxwell, knowledge of other underage victims, and any contact from the accused during federal investigations.
EFTA00019717.pdf
This document is an email thread from October 18, 2019, in which attorney Gloria Allred contacts unidentified recipients (likely prosecutors or investigators) regarding a new client who alleges she was a victim of Jeffrey Epstein in the 1990s. The client is reported to be willing to fly to New York for a 'victim meeting' scheduled for October 23. The forwarding party discusses scheduling logistics, noting a conflict with their own trial schedule.
EFTA00017769.pdf
This document contains a series of emails between February and July 2020 involving Jill Greenfield (Fieldfisher) and Assistant US Attorneys from the Southern District of New York regarding the potential interview of a witness/victim in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The correspondence discusses the logistics of meeting in London versus the US, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on travel, and specific legal conditions such as anonymity, the presence of support persons, and the scope of questioning. Crucially, it reveals the client was employed by Ghislaine Maxwell and has filed a complaint with the Met Police regarding sexual assault by Epstein in London.
EFTA00011402.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 2020 between government prosecutors and an attorney representing nine potential Epstein/Maxwell victims. Following Ghislaine Maxwell's arrest, the attorney contacted the government stating that at least one client, who had previously refused to cooperate in January 2020, was now 'ready to help.' The government requests client names and filed lawsuits to conduct conflict checks and proposes scheduling an 'attorney proffer' to gather information.
DOJ-OGR-00018117.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument over the admissibility of testimony. An attorney objects to an agent's testimony about finding a stain resembling semen on a massage table during a search on October 20, 2005, arguing it is prejudicial and irrelevant as it was found a year after the alleged conspiracy ended in 2004. Attorney Ms. Comey counters that the testimony will be brief and clinical, merely describing the agent's observation.
DOJ-OGR-00001065.jpg
This document is a court transcript in which an attorney refutes the government's allegations about their client's finances. The attorney argues the government has exaggerated the number of bank accounts, explains a $500,000 transfer as a maturing bond, and attributes another large transfer to the financial fallout their client experienced after Mr. Epstein's arrest.
DOJ-OGR-00001048.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where an attorney is addressing a judge. The attorney argues that their client, people close to the client, and even the law firm (Haddon Morgan) have received serious physical and death threats, which they present as a significant factor for the court's consideration. The attorney contrasts the reality of these threats with the government's alleged attempts to downplay them.
DOJ-OGR-00030484.jpg
This legal document, a letter from the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt to Ms. Lanna Belohlavek dated June 5, 2006, analyzes the significant risk that a client's potential plea to aggravated assault in Florida could trigger mandatory sex offender registration. The analysis covers the specific laws and registration requirements in the client's primary residence of the Virgin Islands, secondary domicile of New York, and other states like Oklahoma and Montana, highlighting how different jurisdictions interpret and apply their statutes to out-of-state convictions.
DOJ-OGR-00030481.jpg
This is page 6 of a letter dated June 5, 2006, from attorney Gerald B. Lefcourt to Lanna Belohlavek. Lefcourt argues that the State's case against his client has significantly weakened since a meeting on February 16, 2006, by systematically discrediting a key witness. He lists numerous alleged issues with the witness, including a history of theft, prostitution, drug use, and lying, while contrasting this with his client, who has passed a lie detector test and provided favorable psycho-sexual evaluations.
DOJ-OGR-00022009.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court hearing on February 10, 2020, for case 1:19-cr-00830-AT. A defense attorney states their intention to file a motion to dismiss the indictment on the grounds of selective prosecution. The attorney also requests discovery materials from an Inspector General's report concerning the same incident, anticipating that this will cause a trial delay, to which the court replies that the issue has already been addressed.
DOJ-OGR-00022006.jpg
A page from a court transcript filed on February 10, 2020, regarding Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT. Defense attorney Mr. Foy is arguing for an adjournment of proceedings, citing the need for further investigation and a scheduling conflict with another trial set to begin July 20 before Judge Ramos at 40 Foley Square. Foy notes that the other trial involves a client facing a mandatory life sentence who has been incarcerated for nearly two years.
DOJ-OGR-00021968.jpg
This document is a court transcript from December 16, 2019, detailing a judge's ruling on the conditions for pretrial release for two codefendants. The judge imposes several conditions, including the surrender of all personal and duty firearms and permits, the posting of a $100,000 bond, the surrender of all travel documents, and a strict no-contact order between the defendants unless in the presence of their counsel.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017469.jpg
This document appears to be a personal narrative or memoir excerpt, likely by Alan Dershowitz (based on the son's name 'Elon' and the Harvard Square setting), dated April 2, 2012. The text describes an incident where the narrator's 10-year-old son was assaulted and threatened by thugs in Harvard Square. The narrator admits to intimidating the thugs by falsely implying he had a personal connection to a notorious hit man he was consulting for legally, an act he questions as a potential 'crime' but justifies as parental protection.
Sales numbers
Client asked about wind noise; Josh explained he was on a glacier on Mt. Rainier.
Unknown
Client heard gongs and asked if Josh was in church; Josh replied 'Yes?'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity