| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Michael Morell
|
Professional deputy director |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
McMann
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0010-06-01 | N/A | CIA Director and Deputy briefed by NSA on Snowden breach. | Unknown | View |
This legal document is a court's analysis regarding the impartiality of 'Juror 50'. The Court argues that even if the juror, a victim of sexual abuse, had disclosed this during jury selection, it would not have been grounds for a 'challenge for cause'. The Court found the juror's testimony credible and affirmed that individuals with traumatic experiences can serve as fair and impartial jurors, drawing parallels to jurors in murder and fraud trials.
This document is page 'xi' of a legal filing, specifically Document 79 in Case 22-1426, filed on June 29, 2023. It serves as a table of authorities, listing various court cases and U.S. Code statutes that are cited within the larger document, along with the corresponding page numbers for each reference.
This legal document, filed on February 24, 2022, argues against setting aside a jury verdict. It establishes that the standard for doing so is an "exacting hurdle," citing Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b), which severely restricts jurors from testifying about their deliberations. The document contrasts this federal standard with New Jersey state law and clarifies that only specific, improper outside influences, not a juror's personal experiences, can be grounds for such an inquiry.
This document appears to be page 137 from a book (likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, based on the ISBN in the footer filename) included in House Oversight Committee files. The text details the aftermath of the Edward Snowden data breach, focusing on the DIA's forensic examination, the creation of the Joint Staff Mitigation Oversight Task Force, and the delayed briefing of CIA leadership (Brennan and Morell) regarding the extent of the theft. It highlights the friction between the NSA and CIA regarding information sharing about the breach.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity