Juror Payton
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Juror Payton's son
|
Family |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
district court
|
Participant in court proceedings |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood case, a products liability action involving Juror Pa... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009033.jpg
This document is page 32 of a legal filing (Document 613) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It discusses legal precedents regarding juror misconduct, specifically citing the Supreme Court's decision in McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood (referenced via 'Id.' and the mention of 'Juror Payton'). The text outlines the legal standard required to obtain a new trial when a juror fails to answer voir dire questions honestly.
DOJ-OGR-00009032.jpg
This document, a legal filing from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, discusses legal precedent related to juror bias and false answers during voir dire, citing United States v. Langford and McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood. It emphasizes that the focus in motions for new trial in such situations should be on juror bias and prejudice, and that factors like honesty and intent are relevant to determining actual bias. The document also notes that the terms "deliberate" and "intentional" are used interchangeably in the caselaw.
DOJ-OGR-00009724.jpg
This legal document outlines the appellate history of a case concerning juror bias. The district court denied a new trial, the court of appeals reversed that decision, and the Supreme Court then reversed the court of appeals, establishing a new, stricter legal standard for when a juror's failure to disclose information during voir dire warrants a new trial. The case was ultimately remanded for an evidentiary hearing under this new standard.
DOJ-OGR-00009723.jpg
This document is page 31 of a legal filing (Document 642) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on March 11, 2022. It contains legal arguments regarding a motion for a new trial, specifically discussing the legal standards for juror misconduct and false answers during voir dire (jury selection). The text cites precedents such as United States v. Langford and McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity