Boyd
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Peter Bartholow
|
Co authors |
5
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00003062.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, likely a government brief, arguing against a defendant's claim of Fifth Amendment privilege. It cites numerous court cases (such as Boyd, Fisher, and Bryson) to establish that the act of production privilege for private papers has been limited and that the Fifth Amendment does not protect an individual from prosecution for perjury, even if testimony was improperly compelled. The core argument is that a citizen cannot lie to the government with impunity.
DOJ-OGR-00004880.jpg
This legal document argues that Bill Cosby did not invoke his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination during civil depositions because he reasonably relied on District Attorney Castor's decision not to prosecute him. This reliance led Cosby to provide incriminating testimony about his past drug use, which hindered his defense in the civil action brought by Constand and resulted in a significant financial settlement. The central legal question raised is whether Cosby's reliance on the prosecutor's assurance was reasonable.
DOJ-OGR-00004878.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on July 2, 2021. The text appears to be an excerpt from a Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion (*Commonwealth v. Taylor*) discussing the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, citing various U.S. Supreme Court precedents to argue that the privilege applies broadly in both criminal and civil/administrative proceedings. The document emphasizes that the right accompanies a person regardless of the legal proceeding type.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031397.jpg
This document describes the controversy surrounding Alexander Acosta's handling of the Epstein case, noting that a 53-page indictment was shelved in favor of a lenient 2008 plea deal. It details a newly announced investigation by the Office of Professional Responsibility into the matter and includes a statement from Senator Sasse emphasizing the need for justice for the victims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015524.jpg
This document is page 312 of an academic text (likely a book chapter by M. Hoffman et al.) stamped with a House Oversight Bates number. The text discusses evolutionary game theory, arguing against 'Group Selection' as the primary driver of morality and suggesting that logical justifications for morality (like those of Kant or Locke) are merely post-hoc rationalizations for evolutionary instincts. It includes a controversial utilitarian example suggesting that the 'norm against murder' causes 'waste' by keeping alive individuals with no future productivity.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015518.jpg
This document is page 306 of an academic paper authored by M. Hoffman et al., discussing game theory, specifically the 'Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma' and the evolution of altruism and cooperation. The text explores mathematical models of cooperation, reciprocity, and Nash equilibrium. While the content is purely academic, the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was collected as evidence during a Congressional investigation, likely related to inquiries into Jeffrey Epstein's funding of academic research (such as Martin Nowak's PED at Harvard, though Nowak is not explicitly named on this page).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029156.jpg
This document appears to be a printed exchange or notes from a heated scientific debate regarding evolutionary biology, specifically the tension between cultural and genetic evolution. The first section (highlighted) argues for the importance of cultural evolution, citing the book 'Not By Genes Alone' (2005) by Boyd and Richerson (implied by 'Boyd and my'). The response, written in all caps, aggressively attacks this view, citing parasite selection and claiming the cultural argument is 'PURE BULLSHIT' because there is no unit of heritable cultural variation. The document bears a House Oversight footer, indicating it was part of a congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's connections with the scientific community.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity