| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Unnamed woman
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
This document appears to be a page from a personal blog or essay, marked with a House Oversight bates stamp. The author reflects on the nature of BDSM, intimacy, and casual sex, comparing personal experiences to a description written by a 'reporter.' The text details an emotional reaction during a BDSM encounter following a breakup with an ex-boyfriend named 'Mr. Inferno.'
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript draft (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the reference to his book 'The Best Defense') submitted to the House Oversight Committee. It details two specific legal cases involving attempted murder: one involving the 'factual impossibility' of killing a corpse, and another utilizing a biblical analogy (the 'Abraham Defense') regarding a man who threatened his sister's abuser but was stopped by police. Both cases highlight complex legal defenses regarding intent and impossibility, resulting in the clients going free.
This document is page 258 of a book (likely Ehud Barak's memoir), bearing a House Oversight stamp. It details the events of February 25, 1994, specifically the Cave of the Patriarchs massacre in Hebron committed by Baruch Goldstein. The narrator (identifying as the IDF Chief of Staff) describes rushing to the scene via helicopter, meeting with Palestinian leaders to express condolences, and managing the subsequent violent protests and security lockdown in the West Bank.
This document is a news article, marked as a House Oversight committee exhibit, concerning a New York Times report on Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. The report alleged that in May 2017, Rosenstein suggested secretly recording President Trump and invoking the 25th Amendment, claims which reporter Michael Schmidt later defended as serious and documented in memos by then-acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe. The article places these allegations in the context of the Mueller investigation and recent developments involving Paul Manafort and Michael Cohen.
Michael Schmidt defended the seriousness of his report's claims against the idea that Rosenstein was being sarcastic.
Michael Schmidt defended the seriousness of his report's claims against the idea that Rosenstein was being sarcastic.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity