Jay Lefkowitz
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
25
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
17
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
Alexander Acosta
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Client |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Alex Acosta
|
Legal representative |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Marie Villafaña
|
Negotiating parties |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alexandra Wolfe
|
Professional media relations |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alexander Acosta
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
AUSA Villafaña
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kenneth Starr
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
USAO team members
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ann Marie C. Villafana
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lourie
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alexander Acosta
|
Negotiation counterparts |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
AUSA Villafaña
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Marie Villafaña
|
Professional adversarial negotiation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Opposing counsel negotiating |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-10-30 | N/A | Execution of an addendum to the Epstein agreement. | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-24 | N/A | Transmission of final draft letter regarding Epstein to Judge Davis. | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-24 | N/A | Conversation between Sender and Jay Lefkowitz regarding the letter and addendum. | Unknown | View |
| 2007-10-23 | N/A | Deadline (COB) set by USAFLS for Lefkowitz to advise if they have a deal. | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-12 | N/A | Breakfast meeting between Acosta and Jay Lefkowitz at the West Palm Beach Marriott hotel. Acosta ... | West Palm Beach Marriott hotel | View |
| 2007-10-12 | N/A | Breakfast meeting between Acosta and Lefkowitz. | Marriott hotel, West Palm B... | View |
| 2007-10-12 | N/A | Breakfast meeting between Acosta and Lefkowitz (mentioned in footnote). | Unknown | View |
| 2007-10-12 | N/A | Breakfast meeting between U.S. Attorney Acosta and Epstein attorney Jay Lefkowitz where non-prose... | Unknown (likely South Florida) | View |
| 2007-10-12 | N/A | Negotiation and revision of the 'Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement' regarding victim repr... | Email Correspondence | View |
| 2007-10-12 | N/A | Breakfast meeting between Jay Lefkowitz and Alex Acosta (inferred from 'breakfast Friday' mention... | Unknown | View |
| 2007-10-11 | N/A | Negotiation of the Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement | Email / Phone | View |
| 2007-09-21 | Plea negotiations | A series of communications occurred between the prosecution (Acosta, Villafaña, Lourie) and defen... | N/A | View |
| 2007-09-20 | N/A | Villafaña sends final version of plea agreement to Defense after Acosta's edits. | N/A | View |
| 2007-09-19 | N/A | AUSA Villafaña sends deadline email to Jay Lefkowitz regarding plea negotiations. | N/A | View |
| 2007-09-19 | N/A | AUSA Villafaña sends ultimatum email to Jay Lefkowitz regarding plea negotiations vs indictment. | N/A | View |
| 2007-09-17 | N/A | Date referenced when Villafaña sent a draft Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) to Lefkowitz. | N/A | View |
| 2007-09-14 | Phone call | A planned phone call at 9 am to discuss potential misdemeanor charges under 18 USC 403, 18 USC 15... | Phone call | View |
| 2007-09-14 | Agreement | A tentative 'hybrid' federal plea agreement was reached between the prosecution and Epstein's def... | N/A | View |
| 2007-01-01 | Plea negotiation | Villafaña and Jay Lefkowitz conducted plea negotiations regarding federal and state charges again... | N/A | View |
| 2007-01-01 | N/A | Plea Negotiations | Unknown | View |
| 2007-01-01 | Hiring | Epstein hired additional attorneys, Kenneth Starr and Jay Lefkowitz from Kirkland & Ellis. | N/A | View |
| 2007-01-01 | Legal representation | Attorneys Kenneth Starr and Jay Lefkowitz from Kirkland & Ellis contacted the USAO on Epstein's b... | N/A | View |
EFTA00013706.pdf
This document contains an email chain from November 27, 2007, between the U.S. Attorney's Office (Southern District of Florida) and Jay Lefkowitz, a lawyer for Jeffrey Epstein, with Alex Acosta CC'd. The emails discuss the selection of Aaron Podhurst and Bob Josephsberg (likely as mediators or special masters) and the government's statutory obligation under the Justice for All Act of 2004 to notify victims of the agreement with Epstein. The AUSA insists that vetting conclude immediately so that victims can be notified by November 29, 2007.
EFTA00013701.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2007 involving Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS), including Alexander Acosta (CC'd). Lefkowitz sends a response to a letter to 'Jeff'. The subsequent internal government emails discuss a Palm Beach Post article, with one official noting they 'especially like the part about how the feds were overreaching the whole time,' likely referencing public perception or a quote in the article.
EFTA00013696.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 18, 2007, involving US Attorney Alex Acosta, attorney Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis), and USAFLS staff. The emails discuss scheduling Jeffrey Epstein's 'change of plea' hearing, ultimately agreeing on November 20, 2007. The correspondence reveals a personal rapport between Acosta and Lefkowitz, noting a recent breakfast meeting, and discusses ensuring the date change does not impact when Epstein begins serving his sentence.
EFTA00013661.pdf
An email chain concluding with a formal letter from Jay Lefkowitz (Epstein's attorney) to Alex [Acosta] (US Attorney). Lefkowitz argues against federal prosecution, claiming 'Main Justice' is not directing it and that it would be a 'novel application' of statutes. He cites witness testimony alleging women lied about their ages to Epstein and that the FBI pressured women to identify as victims. He requests a meeting to resolve the matter before a July 8 state court deadline.
EFTA00013623.pdf
This document is a letter from U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta to retired Judge Edward B. Davis, confirming Davis's appointment as a Special Master. The letter outlines the terms of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), specifically identifying that the U.S. government has identified 34 victims. It details Epstein's agreement to pay for an attorney representative for these victims and waive liability contests in specific civil suits, provided the victims proceed under 18 U.S.C. § 2255.
EFTA00013622.pdf
An email dated October 24, 2007, from a redacted sender at USAFLS (likely US Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida) to Jay Lefkowitz, with Alex Acosta copied. The email attaches a document titled '071015_Special_Master_Letter5.wpd' and describes it as the final version of a letter to Judge Davis regarding the Epstein case.
EFTA00013619.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails from October 16-22, 2007, between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS), specifically involving Alex Acosta and a redacted prosecutor. The correspondence details negotiations regarding a letter to 'Judge Davis' (a proposed special master) concerning the selection of legal representation for Epstein's victims. Key points of contention include whether Judge Davis would represent the victims directly, the criteria for the selected law firm, statutory compensation limits ($150k vs $50k), and the inclusion of language regarding discovery to test the veracity of victims' claims.
EFTA00013616.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2007 between Jay Lefkowitz (Epstein's counsel) and a federal prosecutor (USAFLS) negotiating specific terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. The text outlines a mechanism where an independent third party selects an attorney representative for '40 potential complainants,' with Epstein agreeing to pay their hourly legal fees provided they negotiate settlements rather than file contested lawsuits under 18 U.S.C. 2255. The prosecutor's reply accepts most of Lefkowitz's draft but deletes a clause that would have restricted the government from communicating with the independent third party.
EFTA00013612.pdf
This document contains an email chain from October 11-12, 2007, between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (Alex Acosta and a redacted AUSA). The emails discuss and finalize the text of an 'Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement' for Jeffrey Epstein. The addendum clarifies the process for appointing an independent third party to select an attorney representative for the victims and stipulates that Epstein will pay the representative's fees but is not obligated to fund contested litigation against himself.
EFTA00013602.pdf
An email chain from June 20, 2008, detailing the submission of legal defense documents by Kenneth Starr and Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) to John Roth at the DOJ. The documents include a 'Principal Submission' and a 'Summary of Misconduct'. Roth forwards this to the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (Alex Acosta's office), noting the volume of material and suggesting a delay in responding. Acosta instructs his staff to print the documents.
EFTA00013555.pdf
A formal letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys, Jay Lefkowitz and Kenneth Starr, dated June 23, 2008. The DOJ states they have reviewed the attorneys' complaints regarding the U.S. Attorney's handling of the Epstein case but decline to intervene, affirming that federal prosecution is appropriate and dismissing allegations of prosecutorial misconduct. Alex Acosta is copied on the correspondence.
EFTA00013554.pdf
An email chain from June 23, 2008, involving the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS). An official from ODAG sends a letter regarding the 'Epstein matter' to defense attorneys Ken Starr and Jay Lefkowitz, copying US Attorney Alex Acosta. This email is then forwarded internally to other USAFLS staff with the comment 'FYI'.
EFTA00013528.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2007 between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS). The correspondence concerns the scheduling of Jeffrey Epstein's plea and sentencing hearings. Lefkowitz asserts that the Court confirmed a date of January 4th for both the plea and sentencing on 'agreed-upon counts,' while USAFLS staff discuss conflicting dates (Dec 14/16) internally and await confirmation from Judge Davis.
EFTA00013521.pdf
This document is an email thread from October 30-31, 2007, between attorney Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the US Attorney's Office (USAFLS) regarding Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. The correspondence discusses the execution of an addendum, the role of Judge Davis, and the handling of discovery/subpoenas to verify claims. The government official clarifies that Epstein has waived his right to contest liability and damages under the agreement and that their office's role is strictly limited to monitoring potential breaches of the NPA.
EFTA00013518.pdf
This document is an email dated October 24, 2007, regarding the Epstein case. The sender (redacted) writes to Jay Lefkowitz, copying Alex Acosta (USAFLS), to provide a revised letter and addendum for Judge Davis. The email details minor formatting changes to the addendum and requests Lefkowitz execute and return the documents via PDF and Fed Ex.
EFTA00013515.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails from October 2007 between Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Jay Lefkowitz, and officials from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS), including references to US Attorney Alex Acosta. The correspondence details tense negotiations regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement, specifically focusing on the selection of a 'Special Master' or attorney representative for the victims, the compensation limits (150k vs 50k), and language allowing for the 'veracity of the victims' claims' to be tested. The government sets a strict deadline for a deal, stating they have made their final concessions.
EFTA00013503.pdf
An email chain from October 18, 2007, between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (including Alex Acosta and a redacted AUSA). The correspondence finalizes the date for Jeffrey Epstein to enter his guilty plea on November 20, 2007. The USAFLS specifically requests confirmation that postponing the plea date will not delay the start of Epstein's sentence.
EFTA00013499.pdf
This document contains an email chain from October 11-12, 2007, between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS), specifically involving Alex Acosta and a redacted Assistant US Attorney. The correspondence concerns the drafting of an 'Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement' for Jeffrey Epstein. Key points of negotiation include the selection process for an 'independent third-party' to represent victims and the stipulation that Epstein would pay this representative's fees, but not costs associated with contested litigation against him.
EFTA00010507.pdf
This document is a court opinion and order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 v. United States. The court ruled that the government violated the Petitioners' rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) by failing to confer with them before entering into a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein. The court granted partial summary judgment for the Petitioners regarding the CVRA violation and denied the government's cross-motion, while deferring the issue of remedy to a later date.
EFTA00009229.pdf
This document is a transcript of an interview conducted by the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility with R. Alexander Acosta on October 18, 2019. The interview focuses on Acosta's tenure as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida and his office's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically the decision to enter into a non-prosecution agreement in 2007. The transcript details discussions regarding the intake of the case, the assessment of evidence and legal issues including the petite policy, management decisions, and interactions with defense counsel.
EFTA00009116.pdf
This document is a transcript of a deposition or interview with R. Alexander Acosta, conducted by the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. The transcript covers discussions about the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), victim notification issues, internal Department of Justice communications, and interactions with Epstein's defense team, including Ken Starr and Jay Lefkowitz. Acosta defends his office's decisions, emphasizing the goal of securing sex offender registration and restitution, while addressing criticisms regarding the perceived leniency and lack of transparency with victims.
EFTA00009016.pdf
This document is a transcript of a deposition or interview with former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta regarding the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein and the non-prosecution agreement (NPA). The questioning covers the rationale for the state plea deal, the 2-year sentence, the "petite policy" considerations, interactions with defense counsel including Ken Starr, and specific terms of the NPA such as immunity for co-conspirators.
DOJ-OGR-00000178.tif
This document outlines ongoing negotiations and proposals for Jeffrey Epstein's plea agreement and sentencing. It details a proposed sentence of 24 months' imprisonment (12 + 12 consecutively, with 6 months of the second 12 served in home confinement), and the author's intent to set a deadline for negotiations, with charges planned for filing on September 25 if no agreement is reached. The document also notes Epstein's 'second thoughts about doing jail time' and discussions regarding his eligibility for home confinement.
DOJ-OGR-00023198.tif
This document analyzes the circumstances surrounding a breakfast meeting between Acosta and Epstein's defense counsel, Jay Lefkowitz, on October 12, 2007, and the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed on September 24, 2007. OPR concludes that Acosta did not make significant concessions during the breakfast meeting, as the key provisions of the NPA, including Epstein's 18-month sentence and sexual offender registration, were established prior to the meeting and not materially altered thereafter. The document also references a Miami Herald article critical of Acosta's involvement.
Jeffrey Epstein
Notification that Deputy AG has determined federal prosecution is appropriate and setting deadline for surrender.
Jeffrey Epstein
Informing that the Deputy AG determined federal prosecution is appropriate. Epstein has until June 30, 2008 to comply with plea agreement terms including guilty plea and surrender.
Review request notification
Informing Acosta that Epstein's team would seek DOJ review.
Unknown
Informing Acosta that Epstein's team would seek Office's review.
confidential communication
Detailed legal argument against federal prosecution of Epstein, citing lack of evidence for federal crimes (phone use), witness testimony claiming they lied about age, and alleged FBI overreach. Requests meeting.
Independent Review
Confirmed USAO facilitated independent review by DOJ.
Summary of events during Epstein investigation
A letter from the prosecution that Kirkland & Ellis claims is fraught with inconsistencies and falsehoods.
CEOS Review Scope
Advising that CEOS reviewed the matter only for 'abuse of discretion'.
Review Process
Stating the office did not intend to interfere with the review process.
None (Original Message)
Informs Acosta of a $50 million civil lawsuit against Epstein and the intent to notice a deposition for a [Redacted] individual.
Victim Notification
Sloman stated intention to begin notifying Epstein's victims.
Epstein: Victim Notification Letter
Forwarding the victim notification letter as requested.
Re: Epstein
Strong objection to the government sending a notification letter to alleged victims; argues it violates the spirit of negotiations and legal statutes (Justice for All Act vs Section 2255); accepts selection of Podhurst and Josephsberg.
Epstein
Insisting on concluding the vetting process for Podhurst and Josephsberg; stating statutory obligation to notify victims under Justice for All Act; setting deadline for objection.
Epstein
Discussing due diligence on Judge Davis' selection of mediators, citing the Justice for All Act of 2004 regarding victim notification, and setting a deadline for objections.
[Unknown/Blank]
Confirming that the Court will handle plea and sentencing on Jan 4 for agreed-upon counts.
Epstein
Attaching response to a November 5 letter.
Continuous Confinement
Sloman argued NPA required continuous confinement; warned USAO would investigate if exception was granted.
Epstein
Confirmation that Epstein's plea and sentence will occur on the same day, on or before January 4th.
RE: Epstein
Clarifying that Epstein waives rights to contest liability/damages under paragraph 8 of the agreement. Confirming the office does not want to be copied on discovery matters. Stating their role is limited to monitoring NPA breach.
RE: Epstein
Confirming a call to Judge Davis who is willing to serve as the 'decider'.
Epstein
Sending executed version of the addendum; requesting original signature pages via Fed Ex.
Re: Epstein
Inquiring about Judge Davis's willingness to take on a role. Discussing potential discovery to verify claims and asking if the office wants to be copied on subpoenas.
Epstein
Sending an executed version of the addendum and requesting original signature pages via FedEx.
Epstein
Sender attaches an executed version of an addendum (epstein_addendum_10_30.pdf) and asks Jay to Fed Ex the original signature pages back.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity