Professor Dershowitz
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Bruce A. Green
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
David Boies
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Witness (A)
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Alleged misconduct |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unidentified Minors
|
Alleged abuser victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Rebecca Shabad
|
Communicators |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
the witness
|
Subject of testimony |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. SCAROLA
|
Subject of inquiry |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew G. Celli, Jr.
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
the witness
|
Accuser testifier |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Sweeder & Ross
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
the witness
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Professor Dershowitz's application to intervene in a legal case. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Professor Dershowitz | Unspecified room | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Legal service | Bruce A. Green's work as an expert witness for Professor Dershowitz in the case Giuffre v. Dersho... | U.S. District Court for the... | View |
| 2007-11-21 | N/A | Meeting regarding Judge Davis's selection of Podhurst and Josephsberg. | Unknown | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000726.jpg
Fordham law professor Bruce A. Green writes to Judge Richard M. Berman to correct a misunderstanding from an August 27, 2019, hearing in the case *United States v. Epstein*. Green clarifies that, contrary to the court's apparent understanding, he has never served as counsel for Epstein or his estate. He explains that his only involvement in a related matter was serving as an expert witness for Professor Dershowitz in a separate defamation case, a role that concluded in June 2019 and did not involve representation or advocacy.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019299.jpg
This is page 3 of a legal letter from Andrew G. Celli, Jr. representing Professor Dershowitz. The letter accuses opposing counsel of selectively leaking false charges to the Washington Post while withholding exculpatory emails from a redacted witness who allegedly tried to sell a story involving 'two presidential candidates, a former president, and one of the world’s leading entrepreneurs' to the New York Post. Celli demands a stipulation to unseal the witness's emails to allow for full public disclosure.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019298.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal letter from Alan Dershowitz's legal team (Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady LLP) complaining that the plaintiff (Giuffre) leaked selective, confidential information to the Washington Post to damage Dershowitz. The letter attempts to discredit a specific redacted witness (Ms. [Redacted]) by citing her 2016 emails which contained outlandish conspiracy theories involving the CIA, 'the Russians,' and 'Special Agents Forces Men.' The document details the witness's claims of possessing compromising sexual evidence against high-profile figures including Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Richard Branson, and Donald Trump.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021940.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition or hearing involving the House Oversight Committee. A witness is being questioned by Mr. Simpson regarding Jeffrey Epstein's use of the Fifth Amendment. The witness testifies that Epstein selectively invoked the Fifth Amendment to protect people 'higher up in the echelon' (specifically citing Professor Dershowitz), while willing to identify 'household people' (citing Alessi) in civil case interrogatories.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021931.jpg
This is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021931). Mr. Simpson questions a witness about the seriousness of accusing an adult of sex with a minor and the harm caused by false allegations to victims' rights. The questioning specifically focuses on the witness's previous statements and inferences regarding allegations that Professor Dershowitz engaged in misconduct.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021887.jpg
This document is page 64 of a rough draft legal transcript, likely from a House Oversight Committee investigation given the Bates stamp. It features an exchange between attorneys Mr. Simpson and Mr. Scarola, and an unnamed witness. The witness denies that Professor Dershowitz abused other minors, and the ensuing dialogue concerns the procedural rules for the witness referring to notes and documents to refresh their recollection versus testifying from memory.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021856.jpg
This document page is a rough draft of a deposition transcript. A witness is questioned by Mr. Simpson about whether anyone had told them that Professor Dershowitz abused minors. Ms. McCawley objects based on attorney/client privilege regarding Virginia Roberts, and Mr. Scarola instructs the witness not to answer, to which the witness agrees.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021851.jpg
This page is a rough draft of a deposition transcript where a witness is questioned about allegations that Professor Dershowitz abused minors other than Virginia Roberts. The witness refers to a pool of roughly 23 to 24 minors identified in a Palm Beach Police Department report and states that Jeffrey Epstein trafficked girls in Florida, New York, and on his airplanes, but has refused to name them.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021847.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft legal transcript (House Oversight) containing a deposition. The witness confirms that 'Jane Doe Number 3' is Virginia Roberts (spelled Goufrey). The testimony discusses allegations that Professor Dershowitz abused Roberts and potentially other minors. The witness references an 89-page Palm Beach Police Department report that lists 23 or 24 minors who visited Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach mansion during a six-month period in 2005.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021832.jpg
Page 9 of a rough draft transcript from a House Oversight investigation. Mr. Scarola and the Witness request access to communications involving 'Rebecca' and Professor Dershowitz before proceeding. Mr. Simpson argues the documents are unnecessary as he intends to avoid questions specifically about those communications, noting the Witness was present for Dershowitz's prior testimony.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021831.jpg
This is page 8 of a rough draft deposition transcript. The text begins with a procedural discussion between a questioner and a witness regarding how questions should be answered. Mr. Scarola interrupts to ask about a document placed before him, which Mr. Scott confirms is a copy of an entry from Professor Dershowitz's book, provided in response to a request made during a previous deposition.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021829.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft of a legal deposition transcript (Bates stamped House Oversight). The dialogue involves a witness confirming they previously represented to a court that striking pleadings is a 'drastic remedy' during proceedings involving Professor Alan Dershowitz's application to intervene in a case. The witness also discusses referring parties to the Bar.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021826.jpg
This document is page 3 of a rough draft transcript from the deposition of Paul G. Cassell. The text covers the swearing-in of the witness and the beginning of the direct examination by Mr. Simpson. Cassell confirms his background as a former United States District Judge who served from 2002 to November 2007, appointed by the second President Bush (George W. Bush).
Motion to Strike
Reference to a motion filed by Dershowitz.
Unknown
Subject of a discovery dispute; Witness wants to review them.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity