This document is an excerpt from a legal transcript, likely a deposition, focusing on discussions about Jeffrey Epstein's alleged abuse of masseuses in the 1990s. Ghislaine Maxwell and others are questioned about their knowledge and assumptions regarding the age of these individuals and the nature of the 'abuse'.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness. The witness testifies about conversations with a person named 'Jane' that took place around 2009, in which Jane revealed that the presence of another woman at Jeffrey Epstein's house made her feel more comfortable. The transcript includes a sustained objection by an attorney, Ms. Sternheim, and instructions from the court.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features an argument by attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding the admissibility of evidence under the business records exception (Rule 803.6), specifically challenging the consistency of record-keeping in a 'book' and 'Western Union money transfer records' after an individual named Mr. Alessi left in 2002. The defense argues that the records do not meet the standard of a regular business practice.
A page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring a legal argument regarding the admissibility of evidence under Rule 803.6 (Business Records). Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues that record-keeping practices were inconsistent after Mr. Alessi left in 2002, contradicting testimony by Alessi and Ms. Hesse. The discussion specifically concerns the admissibility of Western Union money transfer records.
This document is a screenshot of a Myspace.com picture page, likely saved or accessed on November 14, 2005. The page displays a poster of musician Brad Nowell from the band Sublime, with a user-added caption "God.". A comment from user 'Beef Knuckles', dated September 5, 2005, states that their brother owns the same poster.
This document is a page from a legal summation by Ms. Moe in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It references the 2009 deposition testimony of a victim named Carolyn, who stated that Maxwell and Sarah Kellen, not Mr. Epstein himself, would call her to arrange "so-called massages." These appointments marked the beginning of years of sexual abuse for Carolyn, and the testimony establishes Maxwell's and Kellen's roles as facilitators.
This document is a page from the direct examination transcript of a witness identified as 'Jane' in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The witness testifies that she was sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein when she was 14, 15, and 16 years old. She confirms three scenarios: abuse by Epstein alone (most frequent), abuse with Epstein and Maxwell present, and abuse with Epstein, Maxwell, and other women. She states that the abuse happened 'pretty much every time' she went to Epstein's house.
This document contains two scanned pages from a book (likely 'Filthy Rich' or similar investigative non-fiction) bearing a House Oversight Committee evidence stamp. The left page (page 6) features dialogue where a woman named Wendy discusses scheduling, payment, and organizing a meeting with 'Jeffrey' (Epstein). The right page (page 27, Chapter 10) begins a narrative about a composite character named Noel St. Pierre in March 2005, detailing the trafficking of children from Haiti to the Dominican Republic for prostitution.
This document is page 9 of a telephone interview transcript between 'JS' and Virginia Roberts regarding the case Edwards adv. Epstein. Roberts clarifies that Epstein provided her an apartment in Royal Palm Beach (west of the island) to be closer to her family, though she occasionally stayed in the 'yellow room' at his Palm Beach mansion after late flights. The text details her compensation structure: she was paid $200 per hour for massaging Epstein or his friends when in Palm Beach (paid only for massage time), and paid a daily rate when traveling, noting she was 'on call all the time.'
This document appears to be a draft statement or article dated April 2, 2012, written by a defense attorney (contextually Alan Dershowitz) defending the legal strategy regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The text details the shift from a state-level plea deal to a federal investigation initiated by dissatisfied local police, and justifies the controversial non-prosecution agreement by characterizing the federal statutes as 'draconian' and disparaging the victims as willing participants in a 'business.' The author argues the client is not truly a sex offender and expresses doubt that a victim advocacy group's lawsuit to rescind the plea deal will succeed.
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or narrative recounting a conversation with Groucho (likely Groucho Marx) regarding the countercultural movement and LSD. The narrator describes incidents in San Francisco, including a protest on the day LSD became illegal and interactions between hippies and tourists on Haight Street. The page is marked with a House Oversight stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015372), indicating it was part of a document production related to a congressional investigation.
This document is a rough draft transcript page (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021899) detailing an investigative strategy regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker notes that while the 'kingpin' (Epstein) and high-level associates wouldn't talk, the Palm Beach Police had collected interlocking stories of abuse from 23 girls. The investigation then pivoted to lower-level household employees, specifically referencing a sworn deposition provided by Juan Alessi.
This document is page 39 of an interview transcript where an unnamed witness describes an encounter with a man, presumably Jeffrey Epstein. She recounts being instructed to lie about her age to gain entry to his house for a massage, and subsequently lying about her school (claiming Wellington instead of Royal Palm) and grade to maintain the deception. The conversation also touched upon the man's long-term working relationship with an individual named Haley.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity