This document is the signature page of an Addendum to Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. It contains a certification that Epstein has read, understood, and agreed to comply with the clarifications to the agreement. The document is signed by Lilly Ann Sanchez, attorney for Epstein, on October 29, 2007, though it also lists signature blocks for U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, A. Marie Villafaña, and Gerald Lefcourt.
This document is a signature page for an Addendum to a Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a handwritten signature and date (10/29/07) by Gerald Lefcourt, Epstein's counsel. The text certifies that Epstein understands the clarifications to the agreement and agrees to comply, although Epstein's own signature line is blank on this specific page. The document was later filed in court in 2016 and 2019 as indicated by the headers.
This document is the signature page (Page 7 of 7) of a Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. It features Epstein's signature dated September 24, 2007, alongside signature blocks for U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, A. Marie Villafaña, and Epstein's defense team, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez. The text certifies that Epstein has read, understood, and agreed to comply with the conditions of the agreement.
This document is the signature page (Page 7 of 7) of a Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a statement certifying Epstein understands and agrees to the conditions. While signature blocks exist for Epstein, R. Alexander Acosta, A. Marie Villafaña, and Gerald Lefcourt, only Lilly Ann Sanchez (Attorney for Epstein) has signed and dated the document (9-24-07).
This is page 24 of a legal filing from Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM, dated March 24, 2015. The Defendant is responding to document requests regarding Jane Doe #3's alleged history of prostitution and perjury, as well as requests for evidence supporting the Defendant's previous assertions that attorney Bradley J. Edwards is 'sleazy,' 'unethical,' and 'corrupt.' The Defendant objects to the prostitution request as unduly burdensome but agrees to produce documents regarding Jane Doe #3's alleged lying.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity