An email chain from September to October 2019 between likely prosecutors (implied by 'before we charged' and 'second seating a trial'). The discussion concerns a request from an executive producer of an upcoming 4-part Netflix series on Jeffrey Epstein (likely 'Filthy Rich') for an interview with the office. The initial sender notes the production had been underway for 18 months prior to charges being filed. The request is discussed tentatively, with the expectation that the press office or 'brass' would make the final decision.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Healy. The witness denies knowing another 'Michelle' in the office, denies involvement in 'group sexualized massages' with 'Jane' or Jeffrey Epstein, and confirms having been contacted by the FBI regarding the case.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, USA v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues against the concept of 'conscious avoidance,' stating that the core issue is a factual dispute regarding the ages of alleged victims (specifically Jane and Kate) and whether the defense had any interaction with another individual named Carolyn. The defense cites testimony from Mr. Alessi stating he only saw two underage-looking individuals at Epstein's house, contrary to the inference of 'hundreds' of underage women.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which an attorney argues that the government's investigation was not thorough. The attorney uses the example of a witness, Jane, who testified about her involvement in 'sexualized massages' and named other participants, including a 'Michelle'. The attorney claims that despite this information, the government failed to follow up and interview Michelle and others, arguing this lack of diligence is significant to the case.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa by attorney Mr. Everdell. The witness identifies 'Sarah Kellen' as the person who sat in the office where Ghislaine Maxwell used to sit. The remainder of the page concerns procedural discussions between the defense, prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz), and the Judge regarding the publication of 'Government's Exhibit 327' to the jury.
This document is a page from a court transcript of testimony by a witness named Espinosa. The testimony covers the period roughly between 2000 and 2002, confirming that while Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell's romantic relationship appeared to be over, she continued to work for him. The witness notes that Ghislaine's physical presence in the office diminished significantly during this period, transitioning from daily attendance to rarely coming in.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The witness testifies about guests visiting Jeffrey Epstein's office, noting that visits occurred behind closed doors. The questioning specifically focuses on Celina Midelfart, revealing the witness was tasked with sending her flowers (specifically orchids) on Epstein's behalf. The page ends with an overruled objection regarding whether the witness perceived a romantic relationship between Epstein and Midelfart.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa by attorney Mr. Everdell. The testimony confirms that an individual referred to as 'Jane,' along with her mother and brothers, regularly used apartments in New York during the late 1990s and early 2000s. The questioning then shifts to the witness's observations of the relationship and interactions between Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell while working in their office.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The witness is questioned about their observations of the relationship between individuals named Jane and Mr. Epstein. Espinosa testifies to seeing them interact in an office three or four times and describes their impression of the relationship as "loving."
This document is a partial court transcript from the direct examination of Ms. Espinosa on August 10, 2022. The testimony focuses on an individual named Jane, her relationship as Jeffrey's goddaughter, and how this status influenced her treatment in 'the office' where her mother also worked. The examination also inquires about Jane's siblings and the extent of contact between Jane's mother and Epstein.
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Espinosa. The witness identifies a person (referred to by the pseudonym 'Jane') from a document and testifies that Jane visited the office approximately five times, appearing to be around 18 years old, and was accompanied by her mother. Attorney Mr. Everdell is also present.
This document is a page from the court transcript of the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The witness, Espinosa, testifies about Epstein giving 'Lion King' tickets to almost all employees and confirms that Epstein received female visitors at his office. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell requests to display Government Exhibit 12, which is under seal, only to the Court, the deputy, and the witness.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Espinosa. Espinosa distinguishes her role as an executive assistant from Emmy Taylor, whom she describes as Ghislaine Maxwell's personal assistant responsible for tasks like dog walking and fetching coffee. Espinosa also testifies regarding Jeffrey Epstein's travel habits, stating he used his own private planes (estimating he owned three or four), though she notes she never flew on them herself.
This document is page 46 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. Espinosa testifies that Ghislaine Maxwell's role was strictly that of an 'estate manager' who ran Jeffrey Epstein's properties, distinct from the finance staff and attorneys who handled money and business affairs. Espinosa confirms assisting Maxwell with daily tasks, which included making reservations and handling lists of 25 to 50 items per day.
This document is page 45 of a court transcript from the trial US v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The witness, identified as Espinosa, testifies about their time working at the office, initially as an admin for lawyers who were 'important' to Jeffrey Epstein. Espinosa describes rapidly transitioning (within a month) to become Ghislaine Maxwell's executive assistant, detailing a daily routine of receiving task lists and shipping instructions.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The witness describes their typical working hours and lists the colleagues they worked with at Jeffrey Epstein's office during the mid to late 1990s. The staff mentioned includes a legal team (Jeff Schantz, Darren Indyke, Amanda Milroy), an accounting team (Harry Beller, Eric Gany, Bella), receptionists (Michelle Healy, Helen Kim), and Epstein's executive assistant (Maureen).
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Espinosa. Espinosa identifies Sarah Kellen in a photograph (Government's Exhibit 327) and testifies that Kellen arrived towards the end of Espinosa's employment, specifically between 2000 and 2002. Espinosa states she did not know Kellen's specific job title but observed that Kellen accompanied Jeffrey Epstein to his properties and was essentially always where he was.
This document is a court transcript from a legal case filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The witness identifies Sarah Kellen as having occupied an office previously used by Ghislaine. The transcript also captures a procedural discussion between the attorneys (Mr. Everdell, Ms. Pomerantz) and the judge regarding the presentation of Government's Exhibit 327 to the jury.
This document page is a transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Espinosa in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The testimony focuses on the period between 2000 and 2002, covering the end of Espinosa's employment. Espinosa testifies that by this time, the romantic relationship between Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell appeared to be over, though Maxwell continued to work for Epstein in the same role, despite rarely coming into the office towards the end of that period.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The testimony focuses on Espinosa's observations beginning in 1996, specifically regarding the romantic relationship between Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Espinosa testifies that they initially appeared to be a couple who were 'flirty,' but later 'went their separate ways' as Ghislaine began dating other men and they stopped arriving at the office together.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The testimony concerns a woman referred to as 'Jane' who left their shared workplace to move to Los Angeles and act in a soap opera. Espinosa confirms seeing Jane on TV and receiving a gift of signed cast headshots from her.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Espinosa. Espinosa testifies that an individual named Jane was treated as 'extra special' in their office because Jane's mother had claimed Jane was 'Jeffrey's goddaughter'. The questioning also touches upon Jane's siblings and the contact between Jane's mother and someone named Epstein.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The testimony focuses on frequent phone calls received at the office from 'Jane's mother,' who was persistently asking to speak with Jeffrey Epstein. The questioning is interrupted by an objection from Ms. Pomerantz regarding hearsay, prompting the judge to request a proffer.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Espinosa. The questioning focuses on a person referred to by the pseudonym 'Jane,' whom Espinosa recalls seeing in 'the office' approximately five times, starting when Jane appeared to be about 18 years old. Espinosa notes that Jane was accompanied by her mother during these visits.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The testimony confirms that Sophie Biddle was a professional masseuse used by Jeffrey Epstein and that the witness also received a massage from her. The witness details visiting Epstein's residence at 9 East 71st Street in New York to meet Ghislaine Maxwell for work-related errands and describes Maxwell moving residences from the Upper East Side to 65th Street.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity