| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
FBI Victim Specialist
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
victims
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Co workers interagency |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
OPR
|
Communicated with |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Collaborator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Communicated email |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Villafaña and FBI case agent observed plea hearing from courtroom gallery. | Courtroom gallery | View |
| N/A | N/A | OPR's investigation into potential improper influence in the Epstein matter. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Meeting | A meeting to discuss how to proceed with the Epstein case, where the FBI insisted on lifetime sex... | USAO in Miami | View |
| 2017-01-01 | Legal filing | An FBI case agent filed a declaration in the CVRA litigation describing victim concerns. | N/A | View |
| 2017-01-01 | Legal filing | Villafaña and an FBI case agent submitted declarations in the CVRA litigation regarding their int... | N/A | View |
| 2017-01-01 | N/A | FBI case agent's declaration filed in CVRA litigation, discussing victim concerns from 2006-2008 ... | N/A | View |
| 2008-06-30 | Court hearing | Epstein entered guilty pleas in Palm Beach County court to charges of solicitation of prostitutio... | Palm Beach County court | View |
| 2008-01-18 | N/A | FBI case agent provided Villafaña with a list of 19 identified victims. | N/A | View |
| 2006-05-01 | N/A | Meeting between PBPD, FBI, and USAO (Villafaña) regarding federal prosecution of Epstein. | Unknown (likely Florida) | View |
| 2006-01-01 | Interviews | Interviews were conducted with victims as part of the investigation. | N/A | View |
| 2006-01-01 | N/A | Period when Epstein's name was not nationally recognized, and FBI/OPR subjects were unfamiliar wi... | N/A | View |
This document, an excerpt from a report, discusses OPR's investigation into whether Epstein's status, wealth, or associations improperly influenced the outcome of his case. It concludes that OPR found no evidence of such influence, despite news reports in 2006 identifying Epstein as wealthy and connected to prominent figures like William Clinton, Donald Trump, and Kevin Spacey. The report notes that FBI personnel initially unfamiliar with Epstein later became aware of his connections, including those who had been on his plane, and that his legal team's mention of Clinton in pre-NPA letters was contextual.
This document details investigative activities related to Jeffrey Epstein in late 2007 and 2008, focusing on Villafaña's role in preparing for a potential trial and federal charges, despite an existing Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It highlights efforts to identify new victims, revise prosecution strategies, and secure legal representation for victims, while also noting internal communications about the likelihood of charges and the ongoing nature of the investigation.
This document details events from December 2007 concerning victim notification letters related to Jeffrey Epstein's case. Villafaña prepared letters for victims but was instructed by Sloman to hold them after the USAO, via Sanchez, requested a delay due to Epstein's upcoming plea hearing and concerns about potential impeachment of victims for monetary compensation. The document also highlights an FBI agent's concern about unnotified victims and the defense's involvement in drafting letters, as well as Villafaña's later contact with an attorney representing a victim known as Jane Doe #2.
This legal document details the methods used by the FBI and USAO to notify victims in the Epstein case between August 2006 and September 2007, prior to the signing of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It describes how FBI agents hand-delivered letters and pamphlets, the role of the FBI Victim Specialist as a resource, and prosecutor Villafaña's interactions with victims. The document also notes victims' concerns about participating in a federal trial against Epstein.
This legal document details a series of meetings and communications in 2007 between federal prosecutors (USAO) and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team regarding a potential prosecution. It outlines the strategic maneuvering on both sides, including the defense's presentation of legal arguments and the prosecutors' internal deliberations, led by figures like Acosta and Lourie, on charging strategy and a potential non-prosecution agreement. The document highlights key meetings in June and September 2007 where the parties exchanged information and argued their positions.
This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing the internal conflict and confusion regarding the decision to offer Jeffrey Epstein a plea deal with only a two-year prison term. It highlights Prosecutor Villafaña's shock at the decision, noting she felt it violated sentencing guidelines and that she had not been consulted. The document confirms that U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta ultimately made the decision for the two-year term, despite conflicting recollections from supervisors Menchel, Sloman, and Lourie regarding how and when this was communicated.
This document details a May 2006 meeting where the Palm Beach Police Department (PBPD) presented the Epstein case to federal authorities (FBI and USAO/Villafaña) due to concerns that the State Attorney (Krischer) was bowing to pressure from Epstein's legal team. The report outlines obstruction tactics used by Epstein's defense, including hiring PIs to trail police, orchestrating conflicts of interest to remove aggressive prosecutors, and potentially obtaining tips about search warrants. It also discusses the legal strategy for federal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2422 and 2423, citing flight logs listing anonymous 'females' as potential evidence of interstate trafficking.
The FBI case agent told OPR about the process of notifying victims, including hand-delivering letters and the role of the Victim Specialist.
An FBI case agent stated in a 2017 declaration that during interviews from 2006-2008, no victims expressed a strong opinion that Epstein be prosecuted, citing concerns about public disclosure and testifying.
Source provided current email address for a subject and reported receiving 8 photographs forwarded to ATP-Jacksonville.
Expressing concern that victims haven't been notified and stating the defense should not be involved in drafting letters.
The FBI case agent emailed Villafaña stating that the letter being revised needs to account for unnotified victims and that the defense should not be involved in drafting; concern for federal obligations to victims.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity