Epstein's home
LocationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Epstein
|
Ownership |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
L.M.
|
Visited |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
E.W.
|
Visited |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Visited |
1
|
1 |
006.pdf
This document is a letter from Jeffrey Epstein's defense counsel to Judge Richard Berman arguing for pretrial release on bail. The defense proposes strict conditions including home detention, GPS monitoring, and a substantial bond secured by Epstein's $77 million Manhattan home and private jet, with his brother and friend as co-sureties. The letter argues Epstein is not a flight risk (citing his U.S. ties and surrender of passport) and that the current charges are barred by a 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement.
044.pdf
This document is a legal filing from May 2020 in the case of Teresa Helm v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a letter from the Plaintiff's counsel arguing that the Estate Executors are obstructing discovery by limiting it to a narrow time window in 2002 and refusing to answer questions fully. The attached Exhibit A contains the Defendants' supplemental responses to interrogatories, in which they identify specific staff members (including Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and Lesley Groff) who worked at Epstein's New York home during late 2002, list various email accounts and phone numbers associated with Epstein, and identify Shoppers Travel, Inc. as his travel agency. No specific flight logs or aircraft manifests are included in the document.
031.pdf
This document is a Reply by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein to Plaintiff Jane Doe II's opposition to his motion to dismiss a civil suit (Case 09-CIV-80469). Epstein's defense argues that a concurrent state action requires dismissal of the federal case, that the 2006 amendment to 18 U.S.C. §2255 ('Masha's Law') cannot be applied retroactively to conduct from 2003-2005 to increase damages, and that the Plaintiff misrepresents the terms of Epstein's non-prosecution agreement with the US Attorney's Office. The document details specific dates in 2003 and 2004 where the Plaintiff alleges she received payments for acts of prostitution.
013.pdf
This document is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Jeffrey Epstein's defense team in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on May 6, 2009, against Plaintiff Jane Doe II. The defense argues that the federal case should be dismissed because a nearly identical state case was filed 10 months prior, and because the plaintiff is improperly applying a 2006 amendment to 18 U.S.C. §2255 retroactively to conduct alleged to have occurred between 2003 and 2005, thereby violating the Ex Post Facto clause. Additionally, the motion argues that the statute does not allow for multiplying damages per incident and that the plaintiff failed to allege the necessary interstate commerce elements required for federal jurisdiction.
021.pdf
This document is an 'Opposition to Remand Motion' filed by defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen in September 2008 in the Southern District of Florida. The defendants argue that the case should remain in federal court because the plaintiff fraudulently joined co-defendant Haley Robson (a Florida resident) solely to destroy diversity jurisdiction. The filing contends that the plaintiff has no valid cause of action against Robson for civil conspiracy, intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED), or civil RICO under Florida law, arguing that Robson's alleged actions do not meet the legal standards for these torts.
012.pdf
This document is a motion filed on August 21, 2008, by Plaintiff Jane Doe in a civil case against Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. The plaintiff requests the court to preserve evidence seized by the Palm Beach Police Department from Epstein's home, citing concerns that Epstein (who had recently pleaded guilty and was in jail) was attempting to retrieve the evidence through State Court and might destroy it. The document includes a service list identifying legal counsel for all parties, including Bruce E. Reinhart representing Sarah Kellen.
046.pdf
This document is a legal filing from Plaintiff Jane Doe 1000's counsel requesting a pre-motion conference to compel Defendants (Epstein's executors Indyke and Kahn) to produce discovery documents and answer interrogatories. The filing includes exhibits of the discovery requests, which seek detailed information on Epstein's flight logs, financial transactions, communications with high-profile individuals (Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz), and the structure of his alleged sex-trafficking operation. The Defendants have objected to almost all requests, claiming they are overbroad or that they lack knowledge because Epstein is deceased, prompting the Plaintiff to seek court intervention. Note: While flight logs are requested, no actual flight data is contained in this document.
EFTA00013649.pdf
Editorial from The Palm Beach Post dated November 16, 2007, criticizing the potential plea deal for Jeffrey Epstein. The article discusses Epstein's high-profile legal team (Goldberger, Dershowitz, Starr), the evidence found by police (including phone messages and a high school transcript in his trash), and the concern that his wealth is allowing him to bypass the justice system despite preying on underage girls. It notes that a previous grand jury indictment for solicitation was seen as insufficient given the age of the victims and mentions that the federal investigation had reportedly stalled the state case.
EFTA00013630.pdf
This document is an editorial from The Palm Beach Post dated November 16, 2007, criticizing the potential plea deal for Jeffrey Epstein. It details how Epstein, accused of paying underage girls for sex, employed a high-profile legal team including Alan Dershowitz and Kenneth Starr to negotiate a deal expected to result in 18 months jail time and sex offender registration, resolving charges from a 2006 indictment. The article expresses concern that Epstein's wealth is allowing him to manipulate the justice system and avoid more serious consequences.
EFTA00013606.pdf
This is an urgent internal email dated July 3, 2007, likely between federal prosecutors. The sender discusses communications with attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez regarding Jeffrey Epstein. Key points include a request to delay financial subpoenas in exchange for immediate access to computer equipment removed from Epstein's home before a state search warrant was executed. The sender also mentions opening discussions for a resolution to the federal investigation that might include 'concurrent time' (serving federal and state sentences simultaneously).
DOJ-OGR-00008331.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 12/10/21) detailing a legal argument regarding expert witnesses. The defense discusses the potential testimony of Mr. Kelso, noting it depends on the testimony of government witness Mr. Flatley, who will speak about metadata retrieved from devices seized at Epstein's home. Prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach responds that the government has provided ample notice and '3500 information' regarding Flatley's expected testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00000678.jpg
This document is page 40 of a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019, regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case (1:19-cr-00490-RMB). It contains a victim impact statement from an unnamed former model who describes being sexually assaulted by Epstein, receiving money immediately after the act, and subsequently suffering from depression and leaving the modeling industry. The transcript concludes with Mr. Edwards introducing another victim, Jane Doe No. 4, who begins her statement.
DOJ-OGR-00016300.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) by Ms. Menninger. The testimony concerns a visit Farmer made to Jeffrey Epstein's home in late 1995 or early 1996, specifically recalling an office area with a desk and noting the home appeared to be under renovation. The witness discusses a journal entry dated January 7th regarding her return from this trip, which lasted about a week over the Christmas period.
DOJ-OGR-00016299.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (likely Annie Farmer) during the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The defense attorney questions Farmer to establish that Maxwell was not present during a specific conversation at Epstein's home and highlights Farmer's financial motivations by confirming she filed a civil lawsuit against Maxwell and a claim with the Victims Compensation Fund. Farmer confirms Maxwell's absence during the specific conversation but states she does not remember if Maxwell was mentioned by Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00016248.jpg
This document is page 32 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Pomerantz. The witness testifies about a trip to New York where she and her sister Maria were taken by Epstein's driver to see 'The Phantom of the Opera' and later accompanied Epstein to see a movie identified as 'Five Monkeys'. The witness describes Epstein sitting between her and her sister at the movie and making physical advances, including caressing and interlocking his hand with hers.
DOJ-OGR-00016246.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, where a witness, A. Farmer, testifies about meeting Epstein at his home. She describes his residence as "very grand" and "fancy," contrasting it with the small apartment where she was staying with her sister. The witness recounts that after talking and having champagne, Epstein's driver took them to the theater, and that Epstein had asked about her future plans.
DOJ-OGR-00030671.jpg
This probable cause affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department, dated May 1, 2006, summarizes interviews with two of Jeffrey Epstein's former housemen, Jose Alessi and Alfredo Rodriguez. Both men describe a pattern of young girls, some appearing to be of high school age, visiting Epstein's home to provide massages, for which they were paid. The witnesses' statements suggest illicit sexual activity occurred, as they recall cleaning up sex toys and making the bed after these encounters, and believed more than just massages were taking place.
DOJ-OGR-00030626.jpg
This Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department, dated May 1, 2006, details interviews with two of Jeffrey Epstein's former housemen, Jose Alessi and Alfredo Rodriguez. Both men describe a consistent pattern of Epstein receiving daily massages from multiple young women who appeared to be underage, some confirmed as high school students. The housemen also reported cleaning Epstein's room after these massages and finding sex toys, indicating that activities beyond simple massage were taking place.
DOJ-OGR-00030548.jpg
This document is page 8 of a legal complaint detailing allegations against Jeffrey Epstein and his associates, Robson and Kellen. Paragraph 33 outlines a scheme where Epstein paid Robson to recruit underage girls for prostitution. Paragraph 34 describes a specific incident where Plaintiff Jane Doe was brought to Epstein's home ostensibly for a massage, during which Epstein allegedly harassed and sexually assaulted her.
DOJ-OGR-00021213.jpg
This document details allegations and police findings regarding Jeffrey Epstein's conduct, describing how he and his assistants recruited underage girls for massages that often escalated to sexual acts. It outlines the specific patterns of these encounters, the payment structure, the recruitment of other victims by the girls themselves, and the initiation of the PBPD investigation leading to a search warrant in October 2005.
DOJ-OGR-00010545.jpg
This document is page 10 of a legal filing (Document 670, Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated June 22, 2022, detailing the grooming and sexual abuse tactics used by the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) and Jeffrey Epstein. It describes how they monetarily incentivized girls to recruit others and specifically outlines the abuse of a victim named 'Jane,' whom they met at a summer camp in 1994 when she was 14. The text highlights the defendant's role in normalizing abuse, personally fondling victims, and using her social status to provide cover for Epstein's predation.
DOJ-OGR-00009173.jpg
This legal document is a page from a court filing detailing a juror's (David's) explanation for Ghislaine Maxwell's acquittal on a specific charge (count two) involving the accuser 'Jane'. David clarifies to 'The Independent' that the jury's decision was based on a lack of direct evidence that Maxwell 'enticed' Jane to travel, not on a disbelief of Jane's testimony. The document also mentions corroborating evidence such as flight logs and Maxwell's 'little black book', which listed names of 'masseuses' and Palm Beach police officers.
DOJ-OGR-00013675.jpg
This document is page 84 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger. The testimony concerns a visit Farmer made to Mr. Epstein's home in late 1995 or early 1996, specifically discussing the layout of a room with a desk (presumed office) and potential renovations occurring at the time. The timeline is corroborated by a journal entry dated January 7th, shortly after the witness returned from the trip.
DOJ-OGR-00013674.jpg
This document is a page of court testimony from a cross-examination of witness A. Farmer, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on whether Ghislaine Maxwell was part of or mentioned in a conversation the witness had at Mr. Epstein's home in New York, with the witness stating they don't remember. The witness also confirms having filed a civil lawsuit against Maxwell and a claim with the Victims Compensation Fund.
DOJ-OGR-00013623.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of witness 'A. Farmer' by Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony details a trip to New York where the witness and her sister, Maria, were taken to see 'The Phantom of the Opera' by Epstein's driver, and later attended a movie ('Five Monkeys') with Epstein himself. The witness describes Epstein sitting between her and her sister at the movie theater and initiating unwanted physical contact by caressing and holding her hand.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity