Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Juror 50

Person
Mentions
685
Relationships
152
Events
331
Documents
332
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
152 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Laura Collins
Interviewee interviewer
1
1
View
person other jurors
Influence
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Trial The original trial in which Juror 50 served. The events described in the document occurred shortl... N/A View
N/A Jury deliberation Juror 50 made statements about what another juror allegedly stated during the jury's deliberations. N/A View
N/A Jury selection (voir dire) The document discusses the voir dire process, during which Juror 50 allegedly gave false answers,... Court View
N/A Legal proceeding An evidentiary hearing where Juror 50 testified. federal court View
N/A Jury selection The process during which Juror 50 was selected to serve on the jury. courtroom View
N/A Hearing A hearing held by the Court to determine if Juror 50 deliberately lied on a questionnaire and if ... N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding Jury selection process (voir dire) where Juror 50 allegedly gave untruthful answers. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding A discussion of the legal standard (the McDonough standard) for granting a new trial based on a j... N/A View
N/A Voir dire The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding Jury selection process, including a questionnaire session and voir dire, during which Juror 50 pr... N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding A post-trial hearing where Juror 50 testified credibly and truthfully about his failure to disclo... N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding Proposed questioning of Juror 50 to determine potential bias. Court View
N/A Jury deliberation The jury, including Juror 50, deliberated on the evidence presented in the Maxwell trial to reach... N/A View
N/A Hearing A post-hearing brief was filed by Maxwell, and the court is analyzing testimony from a hearing in... N/A View
N/A Testimony Juror 50 testified under oath, and the credibility of this testimony is being evaluated by the Co... Court View
N/A Legal filing Juror 50 filed a motion to intervene. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding A potential hearing is being contemplated where Juror 50 may be a witness. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding A hearing where the Court refused to explore Juror 50's child sexual abuse for bias, despite defe... N/A View
N/A Court hearing A hearing on potential juror misconduct involving Juror 50, mentioned in a footnote. District Court View
N/A Hearing Juror 50 testified credibly at the hearing N/A View
N/A Hearing A court hearing where Juror 50 testified about his past abuse and his reasons for disclosure and ... N/A View
N/A Media interviews Juror 50 conducted several interviews with international media outlets where he revealed his sexu... N/A View
N/A Trial A trial where Juror 50 served. The facts of the trial involved victims of traumatic childhood sex... N/A View
N/A Voir dire The jury selection process during which it is argued that Juror 50 should have been struck for ca... N/A View
N/A Hearing A hearing where Juror 50 testified about his experience of sexual abuse and his usual reluctance ... N/A View

DOJ-OGR-00009544.jpg

This document is Page 3 of a court filing (Document 620) from February 25, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). It details the discovery that 'Juror 50' gave media interviews admitting to being a sexual abuse victim despite denying it on his juror questionnaire, leading the Defendant to file a motion for a new trial. The document also chronicles communications between Juror 50 and the SDNY Jury Department/District Executive in January 2022, where the juror sought legal guidance and access to his questionnaire.

Court filing / order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009542.jpg

This document is an Opinion & Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan denies the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record, which alleged misconduct by 'Juror 50'. However, the Court agrees to a limited evidentiary hearing to determine if Juror 50 provided a materially false answer on a jury questionnaire.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009539.jpg

This is the final signature page (page 3) of a court filing (Document 617) from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on February 24, 2022. The US Attorney's office argues that because Juror 50 has already spoken publicly, no redactions are justified for a specific motion, which should be docketed. The document is signed by US Attorney Damian Williams and AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach.

Court filing (signature page / conclusion)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009538.jpg

This document is page 2 of a legal filing (Document 617) in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 24, 2022. The text argues against the defendant's claim that 'Juror 50's' motion to intervene constitutes a discovery request, clarifying that the juror is seeking access to his own questionnaire which he swore under penalty of perjury. The filing argues that the motion is a judicial document that should not remain sealed, noting the defendant's arguments regarding privacy and potential prejudice lack merit.

Legal filing / court document (page 2 of 3)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009537.jpg

This document is a letter dated January 13, 2022, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The Government argues that a motion filed by Counsel for Juror 50 to intervene and obtain jury selection materials should be filed publicly without redactions, countering the defendant's objection that it is not a judicial document. The document references a previous court order from January 12, 2022, and cites legal precedent regarding public access to judicial documents.

Legal correspondence / court filing (letter to judge)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008829.jpg

This legal letter, dated January 25, 2022, from Nathan Siegel of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, on behalf of ABC News and NBCUniversal News Group, is addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York. It requests to join other news organizations in opposing the sealing of the Defendant's motion for a new trial and supporting exhibits, and specifically asks for Juror 50's motion to be unsealed, citing its relevance as a "judicial document" to the judicial process.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008815.jpg

This is a court order from United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated January 12, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The order states that if a future submission from 'Juror 50' is allowed, the Court will grant the juror's legal counsel access to the ECF (Electronic Case Files) docketing system.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
2 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
2 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received Unknown Entities Juror 50 $0.00 Hypothetical 'receipt of financial payment for ... View
N/A Received Media outlets (im... Juror 50 $0.00 Hypothetical compensation for post-trial interv... View
As Sender
122
As Recipient
28
Total
150

Juror experience / Sexual abuse history

From: Juror 50
To: Laura Collins (Daily M...

Juror 50 disclosed his sexual abuse history and realized he may have misanswered questionnaire Question 48.

Interview
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Service

From: Juror 50
To: media

Statements made by Juror 50 to the media about his jury service.

Media statements
N/A
Communication Source

Juror Screening

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Document Juror 50 is seeking a copy of.

Jury questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Deliberations

From: Juror 50
To: The Independent

Discussed why the jury did not convict on count two (regarding Jane) but convicted on others.

Media interview
N/A
Communication Source

Explanation of questionnaire answers

From: Juror 50
To: Court

Testimony regarding why he answered 'No' to questions about family abuse.

Hearing testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Deliberations

From: Juror 50
To: media

Statements regarding personal experiences and deliberations.

Media interview
N/A
Communication Source

Verdict

From: Juror 50
To: Media/Public

Proclaimed the guilty verdict was 'for all the victims'.

Interview
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Questionnaire

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Documents containing answers regarding prior experience with sexual assault.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Production of communications

From: The Court/Defense
To: Juror 50

Compelling production of Juror 50's communications and other information.

Subpoenas
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection Questions (25, 48, 49)

From: Court
To: Juror 50

Questions regarding history of crime victimization and sexual harassment/abuse accusations.

Jury questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Interview

From: Juror 50
To: Paramount Plus

Unreleased interview mentioned in a trailer.

Interview
N/A
Communication Source

Juror experience/questionnaire

From: Juror 50
To: media

Juror 50 appeared surprised that the questionnaire asked about sexual abuse history.

Interview
N/A
Communication Source

Experience as a juror

From: Juror 50
To: Media/Public

Described identifying with witnesses and convincing other jurors based on personal trauma.

Interviews
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Juror 50
To: Government witness

Juror felt compelled to contact a witness.

Contact
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection

From: Juror 50
To: Court/Counsel (Primary...

Omissions regarding personal history of abuse.

Voir dire
N/A
Communication Source

Juror Bias / Sexual Abuse History

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Juror 50 testified that his history of sexual abuse would not affect his impartiality.

Hearing testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Gratitude for conviction

From: Juror 50
To: public

Social media posts expressing appreciation for statements of gratitude received for telling his personal story of abuse and convicting Ms. Maxwell.

Social media
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Juror 50
To: Annie Farmer

Thanked her for sharing her story.

Social media comment
N/A
Communication Source

Sexual Abuse History

From: Juror 50
To: international media ou...

Juror 50 revealed his sexual abuse history publicly.

Interviews
N/A
Communication Source

Juror Questionnaire

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Responses regarding impartiality, burden of proof, and media consumption (CNN).

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Unsworn statements

From: Juror 50
To: Chinese-language media...

Statements made by Juror 50 to media outlets post-trial.

Media statements
N/A
Communication Source

Juror misconduct inquiry

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Statements about a second juror.

Testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Juror Questionnaire

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Referenced as 'Juror 50's Questionnaire'

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Post-verdict statements

From: Juror 50
To: Public/Media

Referenced as 'Juror 50's Public Statements Following the Verdict'

Public statements
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Questionnaire (Question 48 and 25)

From: THE COURT
To: Juror 50

Questions regarding history of sexual abuse or being a victim of crime.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search