Juror 50
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
United States Attorney's office for the Southern District of New York
|
Association denied |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Association denied |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
another juror
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Laura Collins
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Independent
|
Interviewee interviewer |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
DAILY MAIL
|
Interviewee interviewer |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
court
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The district court
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 189
|
Comparative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Stepbrother's friend
|
Family |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Narrator's Mother (Mom)
|
Family |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 239
|
Comparative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Pagliuca
|
None |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Juror judge |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Stepbrother
|
Family |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Court's Jury Clerk
|
Juror official |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Juror judge |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Paramount Plus
|
Interview subject media outlet |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Juror defendant |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50's attorney
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
media
|
Interview |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Professor Loftus
|
Juror witness |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
media
|
Interview subject |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Potential Government Witnesses
|
Identification bonding |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-08 | N/A | Public hearing regarding Juror 50's answers to questionnaire | Courtroom 906, Thurgood Mar... | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Testimony | Juror 50 testified regarding his answers on a jury questionnaire. | Court | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Hearing | Juror 50 testified under oath about the mistake he made on the jury questionnaire. | Court | View |
| 2022-03-08 | N/A | Hearing where Juror 50 testified. | Court | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Hearing | An evidentiary hearing took place where Juror 50 appeared with counsel and testified under a gran... | N/A | View |
| 2022-03-08 | N/A | District Court hearing where Juror 50 testified under immunity regarding questionnaire inaccuracies. | District Court | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Court proceeding | A court proceeding where Juror 50 provided testimony, as referenced by the transcript (Mar. 8, 20... | N/A | View |
| 2022-03-08 | N/A | Scheduled hearing for Juror 50 to appear before the Court | SDNY | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Hearing | The District Court held a hearing where Juror 50 testified under a grant of immunity regarding hi... | District Court | View |
| 2022-03-08 | N/A | Court Transcript recording (Tr. at 8:14-20) regarding Juror 50's abuse history. | Court | View |
| 2022-03-02 | N/A | Hearing regarding Juror 50 | United States District Court | View |
| 2022-02-25 | N/A | Court filing ordering an evidentiary hearing regarding Juror 50's answers to jury selection quest... | Federal Court (SDNY implied... | View |
| 2022-02-25 | Legal proceeding | The Court ordered an evidentiary hearing to question Juror 50 under oath regarding their answers ... | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Court order | Judge Nathan issued an Order (ECF No.: 610) directing Juror 50 to appear for a hearing. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Court order | The Court approved the Defendant's proposed redactions and ordered the redacted briefs to be dock... | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Court filing | A Memorandum of Law was filed in support of the motion to intervene, on behalf of Juror 50. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Court order | The Court ordered an evidentiary hearing to resolve the Defendant's motion concerning whether Jur... | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 609, a preliminary statement and motion by Juror 50 to intervene in case 1:20-... | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Court order | The Court ordered an evidentiary hearing for Juror 50 to determine if they failed to respond trut... | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-24 | N/A | Filing of Memorandum of Law in support of motion to intervene | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 617 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-24 | N/A | Court Order regarding redactions and Juror 50's motion. | SDNY | View |
| 2022-02-24 | N/A | Filing of Juror Questionnaire document in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Court | View |
| 2022-02-24 | N/A | Voir Dire / Jury Selection | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-02-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 609 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | S.D.N.Y. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009544.jpg
This document is Page 3 of a court filing (Document 620) from February 25, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). It details the discovery that 'Juror 50' gave media interviews admitting to being a sexual abuse victim despite denying it on his juror questionnaire, leading the Defendant to file a motion for a new trial. The document also chronicles communications between Juror 50 and the SDNY Jury Department/District Executive in January 2022, where the juror sought legal guidance and access to his questionnaire.
DOJ-OGR-00009542.jpg
This document is an Opinion & Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan denies the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record, which alleged misconduct by 'Juror 50'. However, the Court agrees to a limited evidentiary hearing to determine if Juror 50 provided a materially false answer on a jury questionnaire.
DOJ-OGR-00009539.jpg
This is the final signature page (page 3) of a court filing (Document 617) from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on February 24, 2022. The US Attorney's office argues that because Juror 50 has already spoken publicly, no redactions are justified for a specific motion, which should be docketed. The document is signed by US Attorney Damian Williams and AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach.
DOJ-OGR-00009538.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing (Document 617) in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 24, 2022. The text argues against the defendant's claim that 'Juror 50's' motion to intervene constitutes a discovery request, clarifying that the juror is seeking access to his own questionnaire which he swore under penalty of perjury. The filing argues that the motion is a judicial document that should not remain sealed, noting the defendant's arguments regarding privacy and potential prejudice lack merit.
DOJ-OGR-00009537.jpg
This document is a letter dated January 13, 2022, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The Government argues that a motion filed by Counsel for Juror 50 to intervene and obtain jury selection materials should be filed publicly without redactions, countering the defendant's objection that it is not a judicial document. The document references a previous court order from January 12, 2022, and cites legal precedent regarding public access to judicial documents.
DOJ-OGR-00008829.jpg
This legal letter, dated January 25, 2022, from Nathan Siegel of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, on behalf of ABC News and NBCUniversal News Group, is addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York. It requests to join other news organizations in opposing the sealing of the Defendant's motion for a new trial and supporting exhibits, and specifically asks for Juror 50's motion to be unsealed, citing its relevance as a "judicial document" to the judicial process.
DOJ-OGR-00008815.jpg
This is a court order from United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated January 12, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The order states that if a future submission from 'Juror 50' is allowed, the Court will grant the juror's legal counsel access to the ECF (Electronic Case Files) docketing system.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Unknown Entities | Juror 50 | $0.00 | Hypothetical 'receipt of financial payment for ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Media outlets (im... | Juror 50 | $0.00 | Hypothetical compensation for post-trial interv... | View |
Juror experience / Sexual abuse history
Juror 50 disclosed his sexual abuse history and realized he may have misanswered questionnaire Question 48.
Jury Service
Statements made by Juror 50 to the media about his jury service.
Juror Screening
Document Juror 50 is seeking a copy of.
Jury Deliberations
Discussed why the jury did not convict on count two (regarding Jane) but convicted on others.
Explanation of questionnaire answers
Testimony regarding why he answered 'No' to questions about family abuse.
Deliberations
Statements regarding personal experiences and deliberations.
Verdict
Proclaimed the guilty verdict was 'for all the victims'.
Jury Questionnaire
Documents containing answers regarding prior experience with sexual assault.
Production of communications
Compelling production of Juror 50's communications and other information.
Jury Selection Questions (25, 48, 49)
Questions regarding history of crime victimization and sexual harassment/abuse accusations.
Interview
Unreleased interview mentioned in a trailer.
Juror experience/questionnaire
Juror 50 appeared surprised that the questionnaire asked about sexual abuse history.
Experience as a juror
Described identifying with witnesses and convincing other jurors based on personal trauma.
Unknown
Juror felt compelled to contact a witness.
Jury Selection
Omissions regarding personal history of abuse.
Juror Bias / Sexual Abuse History
Juror 50 testified that his history of sexual abuse would not affect his impartiality.
Gratitude for conviction
Social media posts expressing appreciation for statements of gratitude received for telling his personal story of abuse and convicting Ms. Maxwell.
Unknown
Thanked her for sharing her story.
Sexual Abuse History
Juror 50 revealed his sexual abuse history publicly.
Juror Questionnaire
Responses regarding impartiality, burden of proof, and media consumption (CNN).
Unsworn statements
Statements made by Juror 50 to media outlets post-trial.
Juror misconduct inquiry
Statements about a second juror.
Juror Questionnaire
Referenced as 'Juror 50's Questionnaire'
Post-verdict statements
Referenced as 'Juror 50's Public Statements Following the Verdict'
Jury Questionnaire (Question 48 and 25)
Questions regarding history of sexual abuse or being a victim of crime.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity