Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Juror 50

Person
Mentions
685
Relationships
152
Events
331
Documents
332
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
152 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person the defendant
Legal representative
17 Very Strong
24
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
14 Very Strong
14
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Juror defendant
12 Very Strong
8
View
person MAXWELL
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
22
View
person defendant
Legal representative
11 Very Strong
17
View
person the defendant
Juror defendant
11 Very Strong
7
View
organization The Court
Legal representative
11 Very Strong
12
View
organization The Court
Juror judge
10 Very Strong
7
View
location court
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
8
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Legal representative
9 Strong
5
View
person MAXWELL
Juror defendant
9 Strong
5
View
person Annie Farmer
Social media interaction
9 Strong
4
View
organization The government
Legal representative
9 Strong
5
View
person MAXWELL
Defendant juror
8 Strong
4
View
person Juror 50’s counsel
Professional
8 Strong
2
View
person Juror 50's mother
Family
7
3
View
organization The Court
Judicial
7
2
View
person TODD A. SPODEK
Client
7
2
View
location court
Judicial
7
3
View
person Counsel
Client
7
3
View
person second juror
Co jurors
7
3
View
person Juror 50's stepbrother
Family
7
3
View
person TODD A. SPODEK
Legal representative
7
2
View
person Mr. Spodek
Professional
6
2
View
person the defendant
Adversarial
6
2
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Trial A legal trial where Juror 50 served. The document references events 'before or during trial' and ... N/A View
N/A Jury service Juror 50's participation as a juror in a trial, which is the subject of the defendant's requests ... N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding The Government submits that the Court should conduct a questioning of Juror 50 to determine poten... N/A View
N/A Legal filing Juror 50 filed pleadings. N/A View
N/A Legal hearing A hearing was conducted by Judge Nathan to inquire into errors made by Juror 50 on a jury questio... N/A View
N/A Testimony Juror 50 testified at a hearing, explaining that his errors on the questionnaire were due to rush... N/A View
N/A Jury selection (voir dire) Juror 50 made sworn statements during oral voir dire months before the hearing. N/A View
N/A Trial The trial of the defendant, Maxwell, where Juror 50 served on the jury. N/A View
N/A Jury deliberation The jury deliberated for multiple days, asking for testimony and evidence, and returned a split v... N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding A proposed post-verdict hearing to determine if Juror 50 deliberately lied on a juror questionnaire. N/A View
N/A Trial The central legal proceeding where the defendant's involvement in abuse was at issue. N/A View
N/A Hearing A hearing where Juror 50 described his past abuse. N/A View
N/A Post-trial hearing A hearing conducted by the District Court where it allegedly abused its discretion by limiting th... N/A View
N/A N/A Potential inquiry/hearing regarding Juror 50 Court View
N/A Evidentiary hearing The Court will hold an evidentiary hearing to inquire into Juror 50's answers to juror questionna... N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding Voir dire was conducted prior to the trial, during which Juror 50 was questioned. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding Voir dire testimony of Juror 50, which is currently held under seal. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding Voir dire process during which Juror 50 was questioned. District Court View
N/A Legal proceeding Post-trial hearing where the court examined Juror 50. District Court View
N/A Legal proceeding Jury selection during which Juror 50 allegedly failed to accurately respond to questions on a jur... N/A View
N/A Trial The questionnaire refers to an upcoming trial involving allegations of sex crimes against underag... N/A View
N/A Jury selection Juror 50 waited in the courthouse, watched an instructional video, and completed a questionnaire ... courthouse View
N/A Hearing A court hearing where Juror 50 testified about his inaccurate answers on a questionnaire. Court View
N/A Abuse Juror 50 was abused on multiple occasions by his stepbrother and one of the stepbrother's friends. N/A View
N/A Trial A legal trial for which jurors are being selected, identified by case number 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Courthouse View

DOJ-OGR-00009544.jpg

This document is Page 3 of a court filing (Document 620) from February 25, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). It details the discovery that 'Juror 50' gave media interviews admitting to being a sexual abuse victim despite denying it on his juror questionnaire, leading the Defendant to file a motion for a new trial. The document also chronicles communications between Juror 50 and the SDNY Jury Department/District Executive in January 2022, where the juror sought legal guidance and access to his questionnaire.

Court filing / order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009542.jpg

This document is an Opinion & Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan denies the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record, which alleged misconduct by 'Juror 50'. However, the Court agrees to a limited evidentiary hearing to determine if Juror 50 provided a materially false answer on a jury questionnaire.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009539.jpg

This is the final signature page (page 3) of a court filing (Document 617) from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on February 24, 2022. The US Attorney's office argues that because Juror 50 has already spoken publicly, no redactions are justified for a specific motion, which should be docketed. The document is signed by US Attorney Damian Williams and AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach.

Court filing (signature page / conclusion)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009538.jpg

This document is page 2 of a legal filing (Document 617) in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 24, 2022. The text argues against the defendant's claim that 'Juror 50's' motion to intervene constitutes a discovery request, clarifying that the juror is seeking access to his own questionnaire which he swore under penalty of perjury. The filing argues that the motion is a judicial document that should not remain sealed, noting the defendant's arguments regarding privacy and potential prejudice lack merit.

Legal filing / court document (page 2 of 3)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009537.jpg

This document is a letter dated January 13, 2022, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The Government argues that a motion filed by Counsel for Juror 50 to intervene and obtain jury selection materials should be filed publicly without redactions, countering the defendant's objection that it is not a judicial document. The document references a previous court order from January 12, 2022, and cites legal precedent regarding public access to judicial documents.

Legal correspondence / court filing (letter to judge)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008829.jpg

This legal letter, dated January 25, 2022, from Nathan Siegel of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, on behalf of ABC News and NBCUniversal News Group, is addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York. It requests to join other news organizations in opposing the sealing of the Defendant's motion for a new trial and supporting exhibits, and specifically asks for Juror 50's motion to be unsealed, citing its relevance as a "judicial document" to the judicial process.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008815.jpg

This is a court order from United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated January 12, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The order states that if a future submission from 'Juror 50' is allowed, the Court will grant the juror's legal counsel access to the ECF (Electronic Case Files) docketing system.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
2 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
2 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received Unknown Entities Juror 50 $0.00 Hypothetical 'receipt of financial payment for ... View
N/A Received Media outlets (im... Juror 50 $0.00 Hypothetical compensation for post-trial interv... View
As Sender
122
As Recipient
28
Total
150

Jury Questionnaire

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Documents containing answers regarding prior experience with sexual assault.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Production of communications

From: The Court/Defense
To: Juror 50

Compelling production of Juror 50's communications and other information.

Subpoenas
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Service

From: Juror 50
To: media

Statements made by Juror 50 to the media about his jury service.

Media statements
N/A
Communication Source

Juror Screening

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Document Juror 50 is seeking a copy of.

Jury questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Deliberations

From: Juror 50
To: The Independent

Discussed why the jury did not convict on count two (regarding Jane) but convicted on others.

Media interview
N/A
Communication Source

Explanation of questionnaire answers

From: Juror 50
To: Court

Testimony regarding why he answered 'No' to questions about family abuse.

Hearing testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Juror experience / Sexual abuse history

From: Juror 50
To: Laura Collins (Daily M...

Juror 50 disclosed his sexual abuse history and realized he may have misanswered questionnaire Question 48.

Interview
N/A
Communication Source

Experience as a juror

From: Juror 50
To: ["multiple journalists"]

Following the verdict, Juror 50 gave interviews to journalists where he discussed his experience as a juror and revealed he was a survivor of childhood sexual abuse, which he had not disclosed on the questionnaire.

Interview
N/A
Communication Source

Juror 50's statements regarding his jury questionnaire

From: Daily Mail reporter
To: Juror 50

Juror 50 was interviewed by a Daily Mail reporter about his jury questionnaire, specifically concerning questions about sexual abuse.

Interview
N/A
Communication Source

Juror 50's statements regarding his jury questionnaire

From: Daily Mail reporter
To: Juror 50

Juror 50 was interviewed by a Daily Mail reporter about his jury questionnaire, specifically concerning questions about sexual abuse.

Interview
N/A
Communication Source

Announcing participation in Ghislaine Maxwell trial

From: Juror 50
To: the world

Juror 50 posted messages on social media, using his actual picture and real first name, announcing to the world that he was on the Maxwell jury.

Social media post
N/A
Communication Source

Juror's memory and belief in victims' credibility

From: Juror 50
To: ["the media"]

Juror 50 told the media that he believed his memory 'was like a video' and that he would advocate for the credibility of the alleged victims in the case.

Media statement
N/A
Communication Source

Juror Qualification Questionnaire

From: Juror 50
To: ["Court"]

Juror 50 completed a questionnaire, providing answers to questions (specifically 25 and 48) that are now being challenged as false and not credible.

Written questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Explanation of questionnaire answers

From: Juror 50
To: ["Court"]

Juror 50 testified to explain his answers, stating he was rushed and that he no longer considers himself a victim of a crime as part of his healing process.

Testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Post-trial inquiry

From: THE COURT
To: Juror 50

Oral questioning regarding Juror 50's answers on the questionnaire and prior experience with sexual abuse.

Hearing
2022-04-01
Communication Source

Jury Selection Questionnaire

From: Court
To: Juror 50

Question regarding history of sexual abuse.

Questionnaire
2022-04-01
Communication Source

Ghislaine – Partner in Crime

From: Juror 50
To: Paramount Plus

Undisclosed interview containing a 'bombshell revelation'.

Interview
2022-04-01
Communication Source

Jury Selection Questionnaire

From: THE COURT
To: Juror 50

Questions regarding background and potential bias.

Questionnaire
2022-04-01
Communication Source

Granting of Immunity

From: THE COURT
To: Juror 50

The Court explains to Juror 50 that they have been granted 'use immunity' regarding their testimony, meaning their truthful testimony cannot be used against them in a federal criminal case, though they can still be prosecuted for perjury.

Hearing
2022-03-11
Communication Source

Juror Impartiality Inquiry

From: THE COURT
To: Juror 50

Questioning regarding whether past sexual abuse experience would affect duty as a juror.

Meeting
2022-03-11
Communication Source

Testimony regarding abuse

From: Juror 50
To: Court

Stated he was abused at age nine or ten by a family member and disclosed it in high school.

Meeting
2022-03-08
Communication Source

Jury Questionnaire Accuracy

From: Juror 50
To: U.S. District Court fo...

Juror testified answers were inadvertent mistakes and did not affect impartiality.

Testimony
2022-03-08
Communication Source

Hearing on potential bias

From: Juror 50
To: ["The Court"]

At a hearing, Juror 50 repeatedly denied any bias, stated he had 'no doubt' in his ability to be fair, and explained his state of mind when filling out the questionnaire.

Testimony
2022-03-08
Communication Source

Hearing on potential bias

From: Juror 50
To: ["The Court"]

At a hearing, Juror 50 repeatedly denied any bias, stated he had 'no doubt' in his ability to be fair, and explained his state of mind when filling out the questionnaire.

Testimony
2022-03-08
Communication Source

Guidance regarding media statements

From: Juror 50
To: Jury Department of the...

Juror 50 called the Jury Department asking for guidance due to statements he had given to media outlets, inquiring if he needed an attorney and if he could get a copy of his questionnaire.

Phone call
2022-01-05
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search