Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Juror 50

Person
Mentions
685
Relationships
152
Events
331
Documents
332
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
152 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person the defendant
Legal representative
17 Very Strong
24
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
14 Very Strong
14
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Juror defendant
12 Very Strong
8
View
person MAXWELL
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
22
View
person defendant
Legal representative
11 Very Strong
17
View
person the defendant
Juror defendant
11 Very Strong
7
View
organization The Court
Legal representative
11 Very Strong
12
View
organization The Court
Juror judge
10 Very Strong
7
View
location court
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
8
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Legal representative
9 Strong
5
View
person MAXWELL
Juror defendant
9 Strong
5
View
person Annie Farmer
Social media interaction
9 Strong
4
View
organization The government
Legal representative
9 Strong
5
View
person MAXWELL
Defendant juror
8 Strong
4
View
person Juror 50’s counsel
Professional
8 Strong
2
View
person Juror 50's mother
Family
7
3
View
organization The Court
Judicial
7
2
View
person TODD A. SPODEK
Client
7
2
View
location court
Judicial
7
3
View
person Counsel
Client
7
3
View
person second juror
Co jurors
7
3
View
person Juror 50's stepbrother
Family
7
3
View
person TODD A. SPODEK
Legal representative
7
2
View
person Mr. Spodek
Professional
6
2
View
person the defendant
Adversarial
6
2
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2021-12-29 Verdict The jury in the case sub judice reached a verdict. N/A View
2021-11-29 N/A Estimated Trial Duration Court View
2021-11-29 Trial The estimated period for the trial for which the juror is being considered. N/A View
2021-11-16 N/A Oral Voir Dire Courthouse View
2021-11-16 Court proceeding Voir dire of Juror 50, where he was questioned by the Court about his ability to be impartial. court View
2021-11-16 N/A Voir Dire (Jury Selection) testimony Court View
2021-11-16 N/A Voir Dire (Jury Selection) District Court View
2021-11-16 Legal proceeding Oral voir dire where Juror 50 made sworn statements about a recent relationship breakup. courthouse View
2021-11-16 Court proceeding Oral voir dire was conducted, during which Juror 50 testified about his ability to be impartial. court View
2021-11-16 Jury selection The period during which jury selection for the case is scheduled to take place. N/A View
2021-11-16 Voir dire Jury selection process during which Juror 50 was questioned and stated he could be fair and impar... court View
2021-11-16 N/A Juror 50 returned for in-person questioning (voir dire). Court View
2021-11-16 Legal proceeding Voir dire session where Juror 50 was questioned about his social media use. N/A View
2021-11-16 N/A Oral Voir Dire of Juror 50 Court View
2021-11-16 Legal proceeding Oral voir dire was conducted, during which Juror 50 confirmed his ability to be impartial. Court View
2021-11-16 Legal proceeding A court transcript from this date is referenced where Juror 50's statements were recorded. N/A View
2021-11-04 N/A Date referenced regarding Juror 50's testimony/disclosure status N/A View
2021-11-04 N/A Jury Questionnaire Session Court context View
2021-11-04 Jury selection process Juror 50 completed the jury questionnaire at the courthouse, where he made an unintentional mista... courthouse View
2021-11-04 Testimony Juror 50 testified that as of November 4, 2021, he had not told many people about his sexual abuse. N/A View
2021-11-04 Personal decision Juror 50 made a conscious decision to disclose his past sexual abuse to a wider circle of people. N/A View
2021-11-04 N/A Date Juror 50 completed the jury questionnaire. Court context View
2021-10-22 N/A Jury Selection / Questionnaire Completion Courthouse View
2021-04-01 N/A Juror 50's Twitter account opened (approximate date based on 'April 2021') Online View
2021-01-01 Social media activity Juror 50 joined Twitter. N/A View

DOJ-OGR-00009544.jpg

This document is Page 3 of a court filing (Document 620) from February 25, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). It details the discovery that 'Juror 50' gave media interviews admitting to being a sexual abuse victim despite denying it on his juror questionnaire, leading the Defendant to file a motion for a new trial. The document also chronicles communications between Juror 50 and the SDNY Jury Department/District Executive in January 2022, where the juror sought legal guidance and access to his questionnaire.

Court filing / order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009542.jpg

This document is an Opinion & Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan denies the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record, which alleged misconduct by 'Juror 50'. However, the Court agrees to a limited evidentiary hearing to determine if Juror 50 provided a materially false answer on a jury questionnaire.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009539.jpg

This is the final signature page (page 3) of a court filing (Document 617) from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on February 24, 2022. The US Attorney's office argues that because Juror 50 has already spoken publicly, no redactions are justified for a specific motion, which should be docketed. The document is signed by US Attorney Damian Williams and AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach.

Court filing (signature page / conclusion)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009538.jpg

This document is page 2 of a legal filing (Document 617) in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 24, 2022. The text argues against the defendant's claim that 'Juror 50's' motion to intervene constitutes a discovery request, clarifying that the juror is seeking access to his own questionnaire which he swore under penalty of perjury. The filing argues that the motion is a judicial document that should not remain sealed, noting the defendant's arguments regarding privacy and potential prejudice lack merit.

Legal filing / court document (page 2 of 3)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009537.jpg

This document is a letter dated January 13, 2022, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The Government argues that a motion filed by Counsel for Juror 50 to intervene and obtain jury selection materials should be filed publicly without redactions, countering the defendant's objection that it is not a judicial document. The document references a previous court order from January 12, 2022, and cites legal precedent regarding public access to judicial documents.

Legal correspondence / court filing (letter to judge)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008829.jpg

This legal letter, dated January 25, 2022, from Nathan Siegel of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, on behalf of ABC News and NBCUniversal News Group, is addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York. It requests to join other news organizations in opposing the sealing of the Defendant's motion for a new trial and supporting exhibits, and specifically asks for Juror 50's motion to be unsealed, citing its relevance as a "judicial document" to the judicial process.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008815.jpg

This is a court order from United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated January 12, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The order states that if a future submission from 'Juror 50' is allowed, the Court will grant the juror's legal counsel access to the ECF (Electronic Case Files) docketing system.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
2 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
2 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received Unknown Entities Juror 50 $0.00 Hypothetical 'receipt of financial payment for ... View
N/A Received Media outlets (im... Juror 50 $0.00 Hypothetical compensation for post-trial interv... View
As Sender
122
As Recipient
28
Total
150

His personal experience of abuse

From: Juror 50
To: ["Public"]

Juror 50 posted on numerous social media accounts about his abuse.

Social media post
N/A
Communication Source

Juror's background and ability to be impartial

From: Juror 50
To: ["The Court"]

Juror 50 answered 'no' to Question 48 regarding being a victim of sexual abuse, but answered Question 47 stating he could assess the credibility of a witness claiming sexual assault or abuse like any other witness. These answers are central to the legal argument in the document.

Juror questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Jury deliberations and personal experiences related to th...

From: Juror 50
To: ["reporter"]

Juror 50 gave post-trial interviews where he discussed his own experience with abuse to explain his perspective on the evidence and jury deliberations.

Interview
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Juror 50
To: victims and witnesses

Request 1(a) calls for communications with victims and witnesses.

Communications
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Juror 50
To: media

The document discusses potential compensation Juror 50 received for post-trial media interviews.

Media interviews
N/A
Communication Source

Juror's memory and belief in victims' credibility

From: Juror 50
To: ["the media"]

Juror 50 revealed to the media that he believed his memory "was like a video" and that he would advocate for the credibility of the alleged victims in the case.

Statement to media
N/A
Communication Source

General communications

From: Juror 50
To: Various unnamed girls

The defendant requests to compel production of a juror's emails and other written communications.

Emails and other written communications
N/A
Communication Source

Content from Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram, and ...

From: Juror 50
To: Various unnamed girls

The defendant requests content from Juror 50's social media accounts.

Social media content
N/A
Communication Source

Comment on a victim's public Twitter post

From: Juror 50
To: public/victim

Juror 50 made a public comment on a victim's public Twitter post after the trial.

Social media post
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Juror 50
To: victims and witnesses

Request 1(a) calls for communications with victims and witnesses.

Communications
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Juror 50
To: media

The document discusses potential compensation Juror 50 received for post-trial media interviews.

Media interviews
N/A
Communication Source

General communications

From: Juror 50
To: Various unnamed girls

The defendant requests to compel production of a juror's emails and other written communications.

Emails and other written communications
N/A
Communication Source

Content from Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram, and ...

From: Juror 50
To: Various unnamed girls

The defendant requests content from Juror 50's social media accounts.

Social media content
N/A
Communication Source

Comment on a victim's public Twitter post

From: Juror 50
To: public/victim

Juror 50 made a public comment on a victim's public Twitter post after the trial.

Social media post
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection

From: Juror 50
To: Court

Juror 50's answers to the questionnaire.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Juror 50
To: Public/Unknown

Communications, comments, and posts held by social media companies.

Social media posts/comments
N/A
Communication Source

Unsworn statements

From: Juror 50
To: Chinese-language media...

Juror 50 made unsworn statements to media outlets regarding the trial.

Media interview
N/A
Communication Source

Another juror's experiences

From: Juror 50
To: public

Statements about another juror who discussed sexual abuse during deliberations.

Public statements
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection

From: Court
To: Juror 50

Question 48 regarding personal history of sexual abuse.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Post-trial hearing

From: Juror 50
To: Court

Sworn testimony regarding lack of bias and reasons for inaccurate questionnaire response.

Testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Immunity and Instructions

From: THE COURT
To: Juror 50

The Court explains the immunity order, the requirement to testify truthfully, and instructs the juror not to discuss jury deliberations.

Court examination
N/A
Communication Source

Question 25

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Juror 50 gave a negative response to the question whether he or relatives or close friends have been the victim of a crime.

Jury questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Question 48

From: Juror 50
To: Court

Answer regarding history of sexual abuse.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Sexual Abuse

From: Juror 50
To: public

Statements about being a victim of sexual abuse.

Public statement/video
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection Questionnaire

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Juror 50's responses during jury selection, specifically regarding prior experience with sexual assault.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search