Juror 50
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
the defendant
|
Legal representative |
17
Very Strong
|
24 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
14
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Juror defendant |
12
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Juror defendant |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Juror judge |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
location
court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Juror defendant |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Social media interaction |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Defendant juror |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Juror 50’s counsel
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50's mother
|
Family |
7
|
3 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Judicial |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
TODD A. SPODEK
|
Client |
7
|
2 | |
|
location
court
|
Judicial |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Counsel
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
second juror
|
Co jurors |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Juror 50's stepbrother
|
Family |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
TODD A. SPODEK
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Spodek
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-21 | N/A | Voir dire process involving Juror 50 | Court | View |
| 2022-02-16 | N/A | Jury Selection | Court context | View |
| 2022-02-11 | Court ruling | The Court denied Juror 50's motion to intervene in the criminal case. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-11 | Court ruling | The Court denied Juror 50's motion to intervene. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-01 | N/A | Jury Deliberation | Jury Room | View |
| 2022-01-26 | Legal deadline | Deadline for Juror 50 to submit a brief if he determines he desires to be heard on the issue of a... | N/A | View |
| 2022-01-25 | Court filing | Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, on behalf of ABC News and NBCUniversal News Group, filed a letter to t... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-01-12 | Court order | Judge Alison J. Nathan issued an order stating that if a further submission from Juror 50 is perm... | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-01-12 | N/A | Court issues order regarding redactions and Juror 50's motion to intervene. | SDNY | View |
| 2022-01-10 | N/A | Counsel for Juror 50 filed a motion to intervene and a supporting memorandum of law. | Court | View |
| 2022-01-05 | Legal action | Judge Nathan issued an order giving Juror 50 an opportunity to be heard. | N/A | View |
| 2022-01-05 | N/A | Reuters article published regarding an interview with Juror 50. | N/A | View |
| 2022-01-05 | N/A | Court sets schedule for post-verdict motions and addresses Juror 50 counsel. | SDNY | View |
| 2022-01-05 | Phone call | Juror 50 called the Jury Department of the Southern District of New York for guidance regarding s... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-01-05 | N/A | Judge Nathan issues an Order regarding Juror 50 | Court | View |
| 2022-01-05 | Interview | Reuters published an article reporting an interview with Juror 50 regarding his jury service. | N/A | View |
| 2022-01-05 | N/A | Juror 50 gave interviews to media outlets admitting to past sexual abuse. | Unknown | View |
| 2022-01-05 | Media interview | Juror 50 made public statements to media outlets, including The Independent and The Daily Mail, s... | N/A | View |
| 2022-01-05 | N/A | Juror 50 called the Jury Department seeking guidance and an attorney due to media reports. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-01-04 | N/A | Publication of interview with Juror 50 in The Independent. | The Independent (Publication) | View |
| 2022-01-01 | N/A | Juror 50 posted on Instagram after trial completion. | Instagram (Social Media) | View |
| 2022-01-01 | N/A | Timeframe of Juror 50's post-trial media interviews. | International media outlets | View |
| 2022-01-01 | N/A | Juror 50 used Twitter account again after trial (approximate date based on 'January 2022') | Online | View |
| 2022-01-01 | N/A | Juror 50 commented on Annie Farmer's Twitter post | View | |
| 2022-01-01 | Social media activity | Juror 50 posted on his Instagram account after the completion of the trial. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009544.jpg
This document is Page 3 of a court filing (Document 620) from February 25, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). It details the discovery that 'Juror 50' gave media interviews admitting to being a sexual abuse victim despite denying it on his juror questionnaire, leading the Defendant to file a motion for a new trial. The document also chronicles communications between Juror 50 and the SDNY Jury Department/District Executive in January 2022, where the juror sought legal guidance and access to his questionnaire.
DOJ-OGR-00009542.jpg
This document is an Opinion & Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan denies the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record, which alleged misconduct by 'Juror 50'. However, the Court agrees to a limited evidentiary hearing to determine if Juror 50 provided a materially false answer on a jury questionnaire.
DOJ-OGR-00009539.jpg
This is the final signature page (page 3) of a court filing (Document 617) from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on February 24, 2022. The US Attorney's office argues that because Juror 50 has already spoken publicly, no redactions are justified for a specific motion, which should be docketed. The document is signed by US Attorney Damian Williams and AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach.
DOJ-OGR-00009538.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing (Document 617) in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 24, 2022. The text argues against the defendant's claim that 'Juror 50's' motion to intervene constitutes a discovery request, clarifying that the juror is seeking access to his own questionnaire which he swore under penalty of perjury. The filing argues that the motion is a judicial document that should not remain sealed, noting the defendant's arguments regarding privacy and potential prejudice lack merit.
DOJ-OGR-00009537.jpg
This document is a letter dated January 13, 2022, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The Government argues that a motion filed by Counsel for Juror 50 to intervene and obtain jury selection materials should be filed publicly without redactions, countering the defendant's objection that it is not a judicial document. The document references a previous court order from January 12, 2022, and cites legal precedent regarding public access to judicial documents.
DOJ-OGR-00008829.jpg
This legal letter, dated January 25, 2022, from Nathan Siegel of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, on behalf of ABC News and NBCUniversal News Group, is addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York. It requests to join other news organizations in opposing the sealing of the Defendant's motion for a new trial and supporting exhibits, and specifically asks for Juror 50's motion to be unsealed, citing its relevance as a "judicial document" to the judicial process.
DOJ-OGR-00008815.jpg
This is a court order from United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated January 12, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The order states that if a future submission from 'Juror 50' is allowed, the Court will grant the juror's legal counsel access to the ECF (Electronic Case Files) docketing system.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Unknown Entities | Juror 50 | $0.00 | Hypothetical 'receipt of financial payment for ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Media outlets (im... | Juror 50 | $0.00 | Hypothetical compensation for post-trial interv... | View |
Juror Questionnaire
Responses regarding impartiality, burden of proof, and media consumption (CNN).
Unsworn statements
Statements made by Juror 50 to media outlets post-trial.
Juror misconduct inquiry
Statements about a second juror.
Experience as a juror
Described identifying with witnesses and convincing other jurors based on personal trauma.
Unknown
Juror felt compelled to contact a witness.
Jury Selection
Omissions regarding personal history of abuse.
Jury Selection Questions (25, 48, 49)
Questions regarding history of crime victimization and sexual harassment/abuse accusations.
Interview
Unreleased interview mentioned in a trailer.
Juror experience/questionnaire
Juror 50 appeared surprised that the questionnaire asked about sexual abuse history.
Deliberations
Statements regarding personal experiences and deliberations.
Verdict
Proclaimed the guilty verdict was 'for all the victims'.
Jury Questionnaire
Documents containing answers regarding prior experience with sexual assault.
Production of communications
Compelling production of Juror 50's communications and other information.
Jury Service
Statements made by Juror 50 to the media about his jury service.
Juror Screening
Document Juror 50 is seeking a copy of.
Jury Deliberations
Discussed why the jury did not convict on count two (regarding Jane) but convicted on others.
Explanation of questionnaire answers
Testimony regarding why he answered 'No' to questions about family abuse.
Juror experience / Sexual abuse history
Juror 50 disclosed his sexual abuse history and realized he may have misanswered questionnaire Question 48.
Experience as a juror
Following the verdict, Juror 50 gave interviews to journalists where he discussed his experience as a juror and revealed he was a survivor of childhood sexual abuse, which he had not disclosed on the questionnaire.
Juror 50's statements regarding his jury questionnaire
Juror 50 was interviewed by a Daily Mail reporter about his jury questionnaire, specifically concerning questions about sexual abuse.
Juror 50's statements regarding his jury questionnaire
Juror 50 was interviewed by a Daily Mail reporter about his jury questionnaire, specifically concerning questions about sexual abuse.
Announcing participation in Ghislaine Maxwell trial
Juror 50 posted messages on social media, using his actual picture and real first name, announcing to the world that he was on the Maxwell jury.
Juror's memory and belief in victims' credibility
Juror 50 told the media that he believed his memory 'was like a video' and that he would advocate for the credibility of the alleged victims in the case.
Juror Qualification Questionnaire
Juror 50 completed a questionnaire, providing answers to questions (specifically 25 and 48) that are now being challenged as false and not credible.
Explanation of questionnaire answers
Juror 50 testified to explain his answers, stating he was rushed and that he no longer considers himself a victim of a crime as part of his healing process.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity