Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Juror 50

Person
Mentions
685
Relationships
152
Events
331
Documents
332
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
152 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person the defendant
Legal representative
17 Very Strong
24
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
14 Very Strong
14
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Juror defendant
12 Very Strong
8
View
person MAXWELL
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
22
View
person defendant
Legal representative
11 Very Strong
17
View
person the defendant
Juror defendant
11 Very Strong
7
View
organization The Court
Legal representative
11 Very Strong
12
View
organization The Court
Juror judge
10 Very Strong
7
View
location court
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
8
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Legal representative
9 Strong
5
View
person MAXWELL
Juror defendant
9 Strong
5
View
person Annie Farmer
Social media interaction
9 Strong
4
View
organization The government
Legal representative
9 Strong
5
View
person MAXWELL
Defendant juror
8 Strong
4
View
person Juror 50’s counsel
Professional
8 Strong
2
View
person Juror 50's mother
Family
7
3
View
organization The Court
Judicial
7
2
View
person TODD A. SPODEK
Client
7
2
View
location court
Judicial
7
3
View
person Counsel
Client
7
3
View
person second juror
Co jurors
7
3
View
person Juror 50's stepbrother
Family
7
3
View
person TODD A. SPODEK
Legal representative
7
2
View
person Mr. Spodek
Professional
6
2
View
person the defendant
Adversarial
6
2
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2022-03-24 Legal filing A juror questionnaire was filed as part of Case 20-cr-00039-AEN. N/A View
2022-03-11 N/A Court hearing regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), specifically an inquir... Courtroom View
2022-03-11 Court hearing A hearing was held regarding the defendant's motion for a new trial, specifically focusing on Jur... Court (unspecified) View
2022-03-11 N/A Hearing regarding Juror 50 in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The judge ... Federal Court (SDNY) View
2022-03-11 N/A Trial of the Defendant Court View
2022-03-11 Court hearing A hearing where the court confirms Juror 50's intention to assert his Fifth Amendment privilege a... N/A View
2022-03-09 N/A Filing of Document 638 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Southern District of New York View
2022-03-09 Filing of a legal document A juror questionnaire for Juror 50 was filed as Document 638 in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. N/A View
2022-03-09 Legal filing Filing of Document 638, a juror questionnaire, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. N/A View
2022-03-09 Legal filing Document 638, a juror questionnaire, was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. N/A View
2022-03-08 Public hearing A public hearing where Juror 50 is ordered to appear and give testimony under oath in response to... Courtroom 906 of the Thurgo... View
2022-03-08 Hearing A court hearing where Juror 50 was questioned about his answers on a jury questionnaire. N/A View
2022-03-08 N/A Hearing for Juror 50 held before Honorable Alison J. Nathan Court View
2022-03-08 Hearing The District Court held a hearing where Juror 50 testified about answers on the jury questionnaire. N/A View
2022-03-08 N/A Post-verdict evidentiary hearing regarding Juror 50 Courtroom 906, Thurgood Mar... View
2022-03-08 Hearing A court hearing where Juror 50 testified about his responses on the juror questionnaire. United States Courthouse View
2022-03-08 N/A Public proceeding/hearing regarding Juror 50's answers to Questions 25 and 48 of the questionnaire Courtroom 906, Thurgood Mar... View
2022-03-08 Hearing A court hearing where Juror 50 is directed to appear and intends to invoke his Fifth Amendment pr... Thurgood Marshall United St... View
2022-03-08 Court proceeding/appearance A court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, with a list of a... New York, N.Y., Southern Di... View
2022-03-08 N/A March 8 Hearing Courtroom View
2022-03-08 N/A Public Hearing involving Juror 50 Courtroom 906, Thurgood Mar... View
2022-03-08 Court proceeding A hearing was held where Juror 50 was questioned about potential bias and his answers on the ques... court View
2022-03-08 N/A Hearing regarding Juror 50's potential failure to respond truthfully during jury selection. District Court View
2022-03-08 N/A District Court held a hearing where Juror 50 testified. District Court View
2022-03-08 Testimony / hearing Juror 50 gave testimony explaining his answers on the jury questionnaire. N/A View

DOJ-OGR-00009544.jpg

This document is Page 3 of a court filing (Document 620) from February 25, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). It details the discovery that 'Juror 50' gave media interviews admitting to being a sexual abuse victim despite denying it on his juror questionnaire, leading the Defendant to file a motion for a new trial. The document also chronicles communications between Juror 50 and the SDNY Jury Department/District Executive in January 2022, where the juror sought legal guidance and access to his questionnaire.

Court filing / order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009542.jpg

This document is an Opinion & Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan denies the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record, which alleged misconduct by 'Juror 50'. However, the Court agrees to a limited evidentiary hearing to determine if Juror 50 provided a materially false answer on a jury questionnaire.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009539.jpg

This is the final signature page (page 3) of a court filing (Document 617) from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on February 24, 2022. The US Attorney's office argues that because Juror 50 has already spoken publicly, no redactions are justified for a specific motion, which should be docketed. The document is signed by US Attorney Damian Williams and AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach.

Court filing (signature page / conclusion)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009538.jpg

This document is page 2 of a legal filing (Document 617) in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 24, 2022. The text argues against the defendant's claim that 'Juror 50's' motion to intervene constitutes a discovery request, clarifying that the juror is seeking access to his own questionnaire which he swore under penalty of perjury. The filing argues that the motion is a judicial document that should not remain sealed, noting the defendant's arguments regarding privacy and potential prejudice lack merit.

Legal filing / court document (page 2 of 3)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009537.jpg

This document is a letter dated January 13, 2022, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The Government argues that a motion filed by Counsel for Juror 50 to intervene and obtain jury selection materials should be filed publicly without redactions, countering the defendant's objection that it is not a judicial document. The document references a previous court order from January 12, 2022, and cites legal precedent regarding public access to judicial documents.

Legal correspondence / court filing (letter to judge)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008829.jpg

This legal letter, dated January 25, 2022, from Nathan Siegel of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, on behalf of ABC News and NBCUniversal News Group, is addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York. It requests to join other news organizations in opposing the sealing of the Defendant's motion for a new trial and supporting exhibits, and specifically asks for Juror 50's motion to be unsealed, citing its relevance as a "judicial document" to the judicial process.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008815.jpg

This is a court order from United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated January 12, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The order states that if a future submission from 'Juror 50' is allowed, the Court will grant the juror's legal counsel access to the ECF (Electronic Case Files) docketing system.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
2 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
2 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received Unknown Entities Juror 50 $0.00 Hypothetical 'receipt of financial payment for ... View
N/A Received Media outlets (im... Juror 50 $0.00 Hypothetical compensation for post-trial interv... View
As Sender
122
As Recipient
28
Total
150

Juror's memory and belief in victims' credibility

From: Juror 50
To: ["the media"]

Juror 50 revealed to the media that he believed his memory "was like a video" and that he would advocate for the credibility of the alleged victims in the case.

Statement to media
N/A
Communication Source

General communications

From: Juror 50
To: Various unnamed girls

The defendant requests to compel production of a juror's emails and other written communications.

Emails and other written communications
N/A
Communication Source

Content from Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram, and ...

From: Juror 50
To: Various unnamed girls

The defendant requests content from Juror 50's social media accounts.

Social media content
N/A
Communication Source

Comment on a victim's public Twitter post

From: Juror 50
To: public/victim

Juror 50 made a public comment on a victim's public Twitter post after the trial.

Social media post
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Juror 50
To: victims and witnesses

Request 1(a) calls for communications with victims and witnesses.

Communications
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Juror 50
To: media

The document discusses potential compensation Juror 50 received for post-trial media interviews.

Media interviews
N/A
Communication Source

General communications

From: Juror 50
To: Various unnamed girls

The defendant requests to compel production of a juror's emails and other written communications.

Emails and other written communications
N/A
Communication Source

Content from Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram, and ...

From: Juror 50
To: Various unnamed girls

The defendant requests content from Juror 50's social media accounts.

Social media content
N/A
Communication Source

Comment on a victim's public Twitter post

From: Juror 50
To: public/victim

Juror 50 made a public comment on a victim's public Twitter post after the trial.

Social media post
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection

From: Juror 50
To: Court

Juror 50's answers to the questionnaire.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Juror 50
To: Public/Unknown

Communications, comments, and posts held by social media companies.

Social media posts/comments
N/A
Communication Source

Unsworn statements

From: Juror 50
To: Chinese-language media...

Juror 50 made unsworn statements to media outlets regarding the trial.

Media interview
N/A
Communication Source

Another juror's experiences

From: Juror 50
To: public

Statements about another juror who discussed sexual abuse during deliberations.

Public statements
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection

From: Court
To: Juror 50

Question 48 regarding personal history of sexual abuse.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Post-trial hearing

From: Juror 50
To: Court

Sworn testimony regarding lack of bias and reasons for inaccurate questionnaire response.

Testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Immunity and Instructions

From: THE COURT
To: Juror 50

The Court explains the immunity order, the requirement to testify truthfully, and instructs the juror not to discuss jury deliberations.

Court examination
N/A
Communication Source

Question 25

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Juror 50 gave a negative response to the question whether he or relatives or close friends have been the victim of a crime.

Jury questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Question 48

From: Juror 50
To: Court

Answer regarding history of sexual abuse.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Sexual Abuse

From: Juror 50
To: public

Statements about being a victim of sexual abuse.

Public statement/video
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection Questionnaire

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Juror 50's responses during jury selection, specifically regarding prior experience with sexual assault.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection Questionnaire

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Juror 50 rushed through the questionnaire and provided inaccurate answers regarding prior experiences.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Assessment of Bias

From: THE COURT
To: Juror 50

The Court asked Juror 50 questions regarding prior sexual abuse and ability to be impartial.

Hearing
N/A
Communication Source

Personal history of sexual abuse

From: Juror 50
To: The Independent and Th...

Juror 50 stated to media that they were a victim of sexual abuse as a child.

Media interview
N/A
Communication Source

Therapy

From: Juror 50
To: public

Disclosed seeing a therapist regularly for help dealing with the stress of the Maxwell case.

Social media
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Questionnaire / Sexual Abuse History

From: Interviewer
To: Juror 50

Juror 50 stated he 'flew through' the questionnaire and did not recall being asked about his own history of sexual abuse.

Interview
N/A
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search