Juror 50
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
the defendant
|
Legal representative |
17
Very Strong
|
24 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
14
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Juror defendant |
12
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Juror defendant |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Juror judge |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
location
court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Juror defendant |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Social media interaction |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Defendant juror |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Juror 50’s counsel
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50's mother
|
Family |
7
|
3 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Judicial |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
TODD A. SPODEK
|
Client |
7
|
2 | |
|
location
court
|
Judicial |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Counsel
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
second juror
|
Co jurors |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Juror 50's stepbrother
|
Family |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
TODD A. SPODEK
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Spodek
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-18 | N/A | Trial of Ghislaine Maxwell | Court | View |
| 0023-12-01 | N/A | Jury Deliberations | Jury Room | View |
| 0016-11-01 | N/A | Follow-up questions and an instruction video shown to jurors. | Court | View |
| 0008-03-01 | Legal proceeding | A court hearing where Juror 50 affirmed his impartiality regarding issues of reporting sexual abuse. | N/A | View |
| 0004-11-01 | N/A | Juror 50 filled out the juror questionnaire. | Unknown | View |
| 0004-11-01 | N/A | Juror 50 answered Question 49 on the questionnaire. | Court | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009544.jpg
This document is Page 3 of a court filing (Document 620) from February 25, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). It details the discovery that 'Juror 50' gave media interviews admitting to being a sexual abuse victim despite denying it on his juror questionnaire, leading the Defendant to file a motion for a new trial. The document also chronicles communications between Juror 50 and the SDNY Jury Department/District Executive in January 2022, where the juror sought legal guidance and access to his questionnaire.
DOJ-OGR-00009542.jpg
This document is an Opinion & Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan denies the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record, which alleged misconduct by 'Juror 50'. However, the Court agrees to a limited evidentiary hearing to determine if Juror 50 provided a materially false answer on a jury questionnaire.
DOJ-OGR-00009539.jpg
This is the final signature page (page 3) of a court filing (Document 617) from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on February 24, 2022. The US Attorney's office argues that because Juror 50 has already spoken publicly, no redactions are justified for a specific motion, which should be docketed. The document is signed by US Attorney Damian Williams and AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach.
DOJ-OGR-00009538.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing (Document 617) in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 24, 2022. The text argues against the defendant's claim that 'Juror 50's' motion to intervene constitutes a discovery request, clarifying that the juror is seeking access to his own questionnaire which he swore under penalty of perjury. The filing argues that the motion is a judicial document that should not remain sealed, noting the defendant's arguments regarding privacy and potential prejudice lack merit.
DOJ-OGR-00009537.jpg
This document is a letter dated January 13, 2022, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The Government argues that a motion filed by Counsel for Juror 50 to intervene and obtain jury selection materials should be filed publicly without redactions, countering the defendant's objection that it is not a judicial document. The document references a previous court order from January 12, 2022, and cites legal precedent regarding public access to judicial documents.
DOJ-OGR-00008829.jpg
This legal letter, dated January 25, 2022, from Nathan Siegel of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, on behalf of ABC News and NBCUniversal News Group, is addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York. It requests to join other news organizations in opposing the sealing of the Defendant's motion for a new trial and supporting exhibits, and specifically asks for Juror 50's motion to be unsealed, citing its relevance as a "judicial document" to the judicial process.
DOJ-OGR-00008815.jpg
This is a court order from United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated January 12, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The order states that if a future submission from 'Juror 50' is allowed, the Court will grant the juror's legal counsel access to the ECF (Electronic Case Files) docketing system.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Unknown Entities | Juror 50 | $0.00 | Hypothetical 'receipt of financial payment for ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Media outlets (im... | Juror 50 | $0.00 | Hypothetical compensation for post-trial interv... | View |
Recall of questionnaire questions
Juror 50 told the press he did not recall a question about his own sexual abuse but did recall one about the abuse of friends and family members.
Juror questionnaire
Juror 50 provided inaccurate answers to Questions 25, 48, and 49 of the questionnaire.
Jury deliberations and personal experiences
The document discusses testimony from Juror 50 about statements he made to journalists, where he broadcast his experiences and the role he played in jury deliberations.
Jury deliberations in the Maxwell trial
Juror 50 explained to The Independent the jury's reasoning for their verdict, including why they did not convict on count two and why they convicted on other counts, citing the corroboration of victims' testimonies.
Juror background screening
Juror 50 answered 'no' to three questions on the questionnaire regarding whether he or a friend/family member had been a victim of a crime, sexual abuse/assault, or accused of sexual harassment/abuse.
Juror's history of sexual abuse
Shortly after the trial, Juror 50 participated in several media interviews where he readily disclosed his history of sexual abuse, using his real name and pictures.
Juror 50's personal story and experience of sexual abuse
After the trial, Juror 50 decided to speak to the international press to 'tell his story', which is presented as evidence of his bias and identification with the victims.
Support for sharing her story
Juror 50 posted a comment on social media to Annie Farmer, a witness in the case, in which he “thanked her for sharing [her] story.”
The trial
The Defendant contends that Juror 50's decision to give interviews post-trial, using his picture and first name, is evidence of bias.
Jury deliberations
Juror 50 described the jury's deliberation process, stating they performed their "due diligence," felt sympathy for the defendant but took their job seriously, methodically reviewed evidence, and were not pressured into a verdict, ultimately concluding the prosecution proved its case.
Motion to intervene
A motion filed by Juror 50 to intervene in the criminal case, which the Court denied.
Juror qualification and background
Maxwell contends that had Juror 50 answered the questionnaire accurately, it would have provided a basis for a for-cause challenge.
Juror qualification and background
Juror 50 made false statements and failed to give truthful answers on the juror questionnaire.
Question 48
Juror 50 provided an answer to Question 48 on the juror questionnaire that is allegedly inconsistent with his public statements.
Unsworn statements
Juror 50 made unsworn statements to media outlets regarding the trial.
Another juror's experiences
Statements about another juror who discussed sexual abuse during deliberations.
Jury Selection
Question 48 regarding personal history of sexual abuse.
Post-trial hearing
Sworn testimony regarding lack of bias and reasons for inaccurate questionnaire response.
Immunity and Instructions
The Court explains the immunity order, the requirement to testify truthfully, and instructs the juror not to discuss jury deliberations.
Question 25
Juror 50 gave a negative response to the question whether he or relatives or close friends have been the victim of a crime.
Question 48
Answer regarding history of sexual abuse.
Sexual Abuse
Statements about being a victim of sexual abuse.
Jury Selection Questionnaire
Juror 50's responses during jury selection, specifically regarding prior experience with sexual assault.
Jury Selection Questionnaire
Juror 50 rushed through the questionnaire and provided inaccurate answers regarding prior experiences.
Assessment of Bias
The Court asked Juror 50 questions regarding prior sexual abuse and ability to be impartial.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity