| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
William
|
Debate opponent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
e:jeeitunes@gmail.com
|
Professional social |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-27 | N/A | Leon Botstein spent afternoon with sender | Current location of sender | View |
This document is a printout of page 3 of an LA Times article by Mark Swed titled 'The case for naming a U.S. secretary of Culture,' dated March 27, 2013. The text discusses potential candidates for the hypothetical position, specifically focusing on Peter Sellars and Leon Botstein. A handwritten arrow explicitly marks the paragraph introducing Leon Botstein, suggesting the user of the document was specifically interested in him. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional investigation.
This document is a digital communication log from July 27, 2018, containing messages sent primarily by 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (likely Jeffrey Epstein). The messages discuss travel plans to Nice, France, and coordinate meetings with high-profile individuals including Tom Pritzker and Leon Botstein (associated with the Open Society Global Board). The document includes specific timestamps, message flags, and a footer indicating it is part of a House Oversight production.
This document appears to be an article or op-ed included in a House Oversight production (likely related to the Trump administration). It critically analyzes the Trump administration's shift toward a friendlier relationship with Viktor Orban's Hungarian government, contrasting it with the Obama administration's approach. The text details specific meetings involving NSC officials (Fiona Hill, John Bolton) and Hungarian officials, questions the strategic value of this 'appeasement' given Hungary's ties to Russia, and expresses cautious hope for the new U.S. ambassador, David Cornstein.
This document analyzes the Trump administration's policy towards the Hungarian government, describing it as a radical departure that allows the Orban government to dismantle democratic institutions without U.S. intervention. It details specific instances of this, including the targeting of NGOs and universities, and highlights high-level meetings between U.S. and Hungarian officials. The document also explores potential Hungarian motivations for appeasement and the hopes of some Hungarians for a stronger U.S. stance on democratic values and anti-Semitism.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity